ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Another Question (General Discussion)
Another Question // General DiscussionlanezeriAug 25, 2001, 5:14pm
Okay, there is this person in AW, whom thinks he made an OS.. he persists to
say he makes Windows run from a DOS command prompt, without a bootdisk, or dual-boot. AND he said he made this OS in VB. Now tell me this, do you really think this person made a WORKING OS that does something useful in VB? lanezeriAug 25, 2001, 5:20pm
These are ALL t-grams from CompuFreak:
no boot disk involved, windows doesn't load on its own I did make an OS, I made it in VB, it is entirely self contained, and it allows you to write and run programs in its own language plus, it doesn't have to control the entire system to be an OS, it only has to provide some control of it to the program running within it in addition to providing some functionality not available without the OS umm.... I had a computer that ran DOS, and I installed windows.. it starts up in DOS as before and I do type a command line to load windows my OS does not run dos or windows programs so it is NOT A SHELL besides, where in the definition of an operating system does it say that it can't run inside another operating system? and what about emulators? yuo can emulate a macintosh inside windows..... it MacOS no longer an operating system??? kahAug 25, 2001, 5:41pm
BeOS is also run through Windows... even though there's a standalone version
as well KAH [View Quote] sw chrisAug 25, 2001, 6:44pm
I thought Visual Basic depended on runtimes found in windows to translate
the commands written in VB-code to 1's and 0's? If this is true, then an OS written in VB can't run without windows... unless he's somehow programmed the runtimes into the OS. And I don't think that is possible. How odd.. a VisualBasic OS. hehe. Ask him to send me a copy. SW Chris [View Quote] lanezeriAug 25, 2001, 7:37pm
I asked for a copy too, that is when he ignored me lol.
As for KAH, there IS a stand-alone version tho, his is just in Windows, made in VB, which required Windows files to run. Get it now? -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X Bot & World Hosting http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] agent1Aug 25, 2001, 7:54pm
An OS can't be written in VB; it requires Windows to run. Unless it can boot the computer without command.com, it's not a separate OS but only a shell used for DOS/Windows.
-Agent1 [View Quote] kahAug 25, 2001, 8:07pm
yes, but that doesn't matter... the standalone version is another piece of
software. and I said there was a standalone version, maybe you need glasses? KAH [View Quote] lanezeriAug 25, 2001, 9:21pm
Yes, but he doesn't understand this.. he swears he made a OS..
-- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X Bot & World Hosting http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] lanezeriAug 25, 2001, 9:25pm
Maybe you need to learn how to type?
"BeOS is also run through Windows... even though there's a standalone version as well" You totally missed the point anyway, the point is to show you that he says he made a OS in VB.. you CANT make an OS in VB.. get it NOW? What I meant by "there IS a stand-alone version", BeOS DOES, meaning it doesn't need Windows (or does it?) however his doesn't.. it's just software that runs with Windows. -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X Bot & World Hosting http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] wingAug 25, 2001, 9:41pm
In all technicalities, Windows 9x isn't an OS either. Simply a DOS GUI.
[View Quote] kahAug 25, 2001, 10:20pm
you could regard it as an OS, at least if you regard any version of Windows
an OS... Windows is just a nice little GUI and command line interpreter for DOS... KAH [View Quote] wingAug 26, 2001, 1:33am
And why the heck was I allowed to post :P
(ignore this message if you don't know WTF I'm talkin about) [View Quote] builderzAug 26, 2001, 11:31am
The trial version of BeOS I downloaded a few years ago ran inside of
Windows, but I think you had to reboot to get back into Windows. It was so long ago I forget. I also know there are some flavors of Linux that can run in DOS and in Windows. Take the SuSE Live Eval CD for instance. I believe it can run under Windows off of a CD without you having to install anything. Builderz Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services http://aw.stuff-x.com/ PGP Key ID: 0xAC0E7073 (for non-commercial use) [View Quote] kahAug 26, 2001, 11:52am
considering that Lanezeri also could post in his ban period, the user DB
obviously is messed up... or maybe the software is messed up... oh well, it's the AWC's loss anyway ;-)) KAH [View Quote] lanezeriAug 26, 2001, 3:31pm
What the hell does this have to do with anything? you idoit.. What he made
ISNT a OS, yet a shell.. that was the whole point of the post.. to get other people's opinions.. he told me Windows runs inside DOS.. now KAH.. does Windows run inside DOS? -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] kahAug 26, 2001, 4:00pm
yes, and if you're too stupid to understand/accept that, just don't post. So
if his thingy is a shell, Windows is a shell. Actually that's correct, but it sounds nicer to call Windows an OS... KAH [View Quote] lanezeriAug 26, 2001, 6:03pm
WINDOWS IS NOT A SHELL IDIOT! So you mean Windows ME is a shell even tho it
uses a DOS emulator not DOS itself.. and Windows NT is a shell too I guess? Don't speak.. you make no sence.. -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] kahAug 26, 2001, 7:45pm
THE EARTH IS NOT ROUND IDIOT! man, look at reality, why do you think DOS
boots up, huh? DOS emulator my ass, it's just to make ppl like you think it ain't using DOS anymore... and if you're not gonna accept that Windows is run inside DOS (read it's a shell), then forget it, go and believe that it isn't and don't reply to this post, because I have no interest to try to make you realize something when you won't accept it. KAH [View Quote] lanezeriAug 26, 2001, 9:30pm
YOUR A FUCKING IDIOT!! I SWEAR YOU'VE BEEN DIPPED IN THE IDIOT POOL TOO
MUCH! Windows is ran ON TOP OF DOS. NOT THRU, OR INSIDE DOS.. damnit.. get a book.. learn to crack.. figure out a way to look beyond the pretty little GUI it has and look at it.. please do.. you'll see your wrong.. without windows not a damn person could do anything.. -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] kahAug 26, 2001, 9:49pm
Ugh... I told you not to reply if you wouldn't accept that Windows is a
shell... maybe you didn't read that... On top off?? get a sense of reality! you don't run OSes "on top" of others! that isn't possible! but what IS possible is to run it from inside and get ppl to you that it's not run from an OS technology which over 20 years old!!!!! It's just that they made it possible to display high-res gfx, and because of more advanced hardware that Windows looks so advanced! KAH PS. if you're STILL not gonna accept that Windows is a shell, then just FORGET IT!!! DON'T REPLY!!! [View Quote] nova n@n.comAug 27, 2001, 12:37pm
windows any version of from 1.0 to even xp is still built on a dos base
WinMe is defently a shell win 9.x is a shell and win2k is a shell. there are way to see this you can strip all the gui away and it will still run. You can boot to a comand prompt only for one you cant do that in non shell os. i havent seen xp but like the rest i kinda figure it to has a comand promt only mode and even if it doest that doesnt meen that dos isnt there just meens it harder to get at. [View Quote] sw chrisAug 27, 2001, 2:26pm
I think we're having some problems with the definitions of the term
Operating System, Shell, and what Windows really is. DOS is an operating system. Windows is built upon DOS. You can bypass Windows and boot to the command prompt (DOS). You can shut down Windows and return to DOS mode from Windows. Windows ME runs a DOS emulator, not DOS itself, although they are essentially the same thing. I think Windows is not a shell because it is built upon DOS. Windows does not run inside of it, like x-Windows for UNIX or Linux. However I don't think it is an operating system either, because it needs DOS to run. So what is MacOS 10? MacOS 9 is an operating system, because it wasn't built upon anything and doens't need another operating system to run. But now MacOS 10 has a command line. :) However it's still an OS for the same reasons Mac OS 9 is an OS. Simply because you can run DOS or exit to DOS from inside Windows doesn't make it a shell. SW Chris [View Quote] lanezeriAug 27, 2001, 5:59pm
Tell me this.. can you run DOS and create files? edit them files, run EXE
files? NOPE.. Windows is a OS.. plain and simple.. because of this.. Windows runs ON TOP of DOS.. get it thru ur heads.. without DOS, Windows would be nothing, you are right about that.. but without Windows, what is DOS? -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] jfk2 builderAug 27, 2001, 7:29pm
When you boot your computer and you hit the HOT KEY COMBINATION to
bring up the menu... 1 - Default 2 - Windows with network support 3 - Windows in safe mode 4 - Command Prompt [normal with support files] 5 - Command [basic with just command loaded] and you pick 4 Command prompt with some files loaded [sound & or 3d video] THAT IS MS-DOS... Windows files have NOT LOADED YET. You are running in 100% MS-DOS and can run anything you want so long as it's MS-DOS program It's when you type EXIT you just sit there at the prompt C:\ line with your curser blinking... THAT IS DOS... You could still type WIN and hit enter to go into WINDOWS like in days of old... Sometimes i do that to delete some DLL file from a running program test. I test a windows program and it does a common register of a DLL file. and in some cases i have to go into MS-DOS mode just to delete the DLL file from the test directory. So when i reboot windows it will find all the dll's as it did before and no harm done. So yes... Windows 95, 98 is a SHELL... But because it boots to windows so fast... Most people never see MS-DOS anymore and you ASSUME Windows 95, 98 to be the only OS on their computers. In reality they have 2 OS's on their computers. DOS v7 and Windows 95, 98... "lanezeri" <Lanezeri at stuff-x.com> wrote in news:3b895625 at server1.Activeworlds.com: > WINDOWS IS NOT A SHELL IDIOT! So you mean Windows ME is a shell even > tho it uses a DOS emulator not DOS itself.. and Windows NT is a shell > too I guess? Don't speak.. you make no sence.. > > -- > > Lanezeri > Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X > http://aw.stuff-x.com lanezeriAug 27, 2001, 9:26pm
Okay smart ass.. you create a program FROM DOS.. and I'll bow down and kiss
your feet.. Didn't think you could.. -- Lanezeri Lead Bot Programmer at Stuff-X http://aw.stuff-x.com [View Quote] wingAug 27, 2001, 9:57pm
Heh, I can't, but it's possible dimwit. Have a look at 90% of all games made before 1995. Fire up an actual copy of DOS and type
"edit" Also, in your original message, you said creating files from DOS. edit c:/newfile.txt run EXE files... Switch to the dir and type the name, assuming it's a DOS EXE file. Edit files. edit c:/oldfile.txt [View Quote] sw chrisAug 27, 2001, 10:57pm
Some programming computer courses require you to learn how to program in
DOS. Windows is niether an operating system, nor a shell. SW Chris [View Quote] lanezeriAug 27, 2001, 11:16pm
Since you are stupid as well.. here is the e-mail KAH got back typed
completely by my friend.. he knows more than anyone who even reads this NG.. <E-Mail to KAH> Then try to explain why i wrote a complete linux system that exists completely on its own, using no api functions or permissions from windows, but runs from and at the same time as windows. Actually if you would take the time to learn what the fuck you are talking about before judging someone else you might be able to make a valid point. The new generation of windows doesnt even run dos, it runs a dos emulator to be backwards compatable. When dos first started it was a stand alone with just a windows shell, that i will give you, but incase you havent noticed yet (obviously you havent) windows is now the stand alone and dos is just emulated so that lamers like you can still run your ancient assed programs. Just for your personal info, (since you seem to be such a lame ass), win 3.1,95,and 98 were actually a GUI (if you know what the hell that even means) Win ME changed to being a stand alone. So all this bullshit about windows being a shell and an operating system are from idiots, its a GUI dumbfucks. Love ya lots, Lanezeri Written by Deisel79 (who is obviously more talented than thou) <End E-Mail> ----- Original Message ----- From: Kristian A. Hiorth To: lanezeri Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:44 PM Subject: Re: Another Question man, I can't believe how stupid you are! it's not Fing possible to run an OS on top of another!!!!!!!!!!!!! you can run two OSes on one machine, but not at the same time! and as Wing said, that stuff is perfectly possible on DOS, but what do you know? I bet you don't even know HOW to use DOS! without Windows, DOS is still the same, just without a piece of software, just like if you removed WordPerfect from a DOS machine (FYI WordPerfect used to be what Word is now)... KAH |