|
standalone mode (Wishlist)
standalone mode // Wishlist
May 13, 2003, 12:42am
it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the property
folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those, people
can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can all
be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
to do than cheat.
May 13, 2003, 2:48am
yeah.. or falling through terrain and landing inside a secret area
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the
property
> folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
> standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those,
people
> can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
> those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can
all
> be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
> could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
> to do than cheat.
>
>
|
May 13, 2003, 2:48am
they need to get that terrain bug fixed
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the
property
> folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
> standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those,
people
> can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
> those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can
all
> be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
> could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
> to do than cheat.
>
>
|
May 13, 2003, 2:21pm
have variables in cache to stop cheats, like "create boundary X to X" lol
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the
property
> folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
> standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those,
people
> can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
> those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can
all
> be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
> could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
> to do than cheat.
>
>
|
May 13, 2003, 2:55pm
you might have come up with a solution to the terrain bug: couldnt AW use
boundary dumps as well to read where terrain is, isnt, goes up, or goes
down?
[View Quote]"john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
news:3ec11b9f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> have variables in cache to stop cheats, like "create boundary X to X" lol
>
> "jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
> news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> property
since
> people
> all
people
better
>
>
|
May 20, 2003, 2:48am
That falling through the terrain.
I have never had this happen in 3.3 or 3.4 yet.
Is there a way to reproduce it?
[View Quote]"calhoun" <coen at charter.net> wrote in message
news:3ec12375$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you might have come up with a solution to the terrain bug: couldnt AW use
> boundary dumps as well to read where terrain is, isnt, goes up, or goes
> down?
> "john" <john at 3d-reality.com> wrote in message
> news:3ec11b9f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
lol
> since
of
can
> people
> better
>
>
|
May 20, 2003, 3:24pm
I think this is a pretty pointless waste of time, if people want to go
flying and shifting around in your world, theres bugger all you can do to
stop em if they put enough effort in.
- Mark
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message
news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the
property
> folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
> standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those,
people
> can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
> those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can
all
> be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
> could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
> to do than cheat.
>
>
|
May 23, 2003, 5:25pm
It used to be that in stand-alone mode you had no more privileges than what you last had when actually connected to the world... if I'm not mistaken. If this has changed, perhaps it should be changed back... or in any event, perhaps a world option could be added to control it whether or not additional rights would be allowed in standalone mode for each world.
TechnoZeus
[View Quote]"jstone2004" <j at jlife.net> wrote in message news:3ec05b88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it would be nice if a change could be made to the cache, making the property
> folders inaccessible for certain worlds in standalone. For instance, since
> standalone allows shift, fly, ect, in worlds which do not have those, people
> can roam around freely. Say there are specific places that the admin of
> those worlds do not want people seeing before a certain time... that can all
> be thrown out the window with standalone mode. It would be nice if people
> could be trusted... but there are people out there who have nothing better
> to do than cheat.
>
>
|
|