|
Demeter 2.0 Alpha Testing (Bots)
Demeter 2.0 Alpha Testing // Bots
Feb 4, 2006, 6:46am
I have completed a translation of the original Demeter 1.x Visual Basic
source code to C++. I believe it is now to the point where version 2.0
is almost totally compatible in behavior with Demeter 1.x.
A small test group will be put together to verify that Demeter 2.0
behaves as expected. Interested testers should contact me by email.
(drsquailboont at gmail.com)
The public release of Demeter 2.0 will be determined later.
Thanks,
--
Dr. Squailboont
Feb 4, 2006, 3:55pm
VISUAL BASIC?!?! Holy shit, we thank you. No wonder Demeter's so crap
[View Quote]Dr. Squailboont wrote:
> I have completed a translation of the original Demeter 1.x Visual Basic
> source code to C++. I believe it is now to the point where version 2.0
> is almost totally compatible in behavior with Demeter 1.x.
>
> A small test group will be put together to verify that Demeter 2.0
> behaves as expected. Interested testers should contact me by email.
> (drsquailboont at gmail.com)
>
> The public release of Demeter 2.0 will be determined later.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Dr. Squailboont
|
Feb 9, 2006, 11:03am
Coming from someone who probally has no experience in either C++ or Visual
Basic.
Only kidding.. it's beyond me if you can program or not.
[View Quote]"Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
news:43e4ea9c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> VISUAL BASIC?!?! Holy shit, we thank you. No wonder Demeter's so crap
>
> Dr. Squailboont wrote:
|
Feb 10, 2006, 3:01am
It doesn't take a programmer to know that VB sucks.....
-J
[View Quote]equin0x wrote:
> Coming from someone who probally has no experience in either C++ or Visual
> Basic.
>
> Only kidding.. it's beyond me if you can program or not.
>
> "Gnu32" <simplaza at simplaza.net> wrote in message
> news:43e4ea9c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 10, 2006, 9:21am
I could blow a badly programmed C++ tool out the water with VB.
VB has many other advantages too, the problem is that a *lot* of its
programmers are n00bs so it got a bad reputation. The main problem VB has is
its lack of advanced OO and WinProc handling.
- MR
[View Quote]"JerMe" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:43ec1e29$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It doesn't take a programmer to know that VB sucks.....
>
> -J
>
> equin0x wrote:
|
Feb 10, 2006, 7:33pm
I have a vb programmed chat bot that has less than a 1ms delay, from time to
get the info from server process it and relay it back. Even 56k users cant
notice the difference. And the bot is running in the interpreter its not
even a complete compile, AND active worlds is open, along with many other
things.
Little do people know that C++ and VB both compile to the same
"meta-language" before being translated into assembly, and then binary.
This is true of Microsoft compilers with default options.
It is not the language that matters, it is the underlying concepts and
understanding. If you understand the concepts, and how the computer
operates, adopting a new language should not be very difficult, it is just a
matter of syntax. The language is really only an issue when conceptually
the language you are trying to use can not easily accomplish the desired
task. An example would be trying to make true sentient artifical
intelligence in C++.
DM
[View Quote]"Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:43ec774a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I could blow a badly programmed C++ tool out the water with VB.
>
> VB has many other advantages too, the problem is that a *lot* of its
> programmers are n00bs so it got a bad reputation. The main problem VB has
is
> its lack of advanced OO and WinProc handling.
>
> - MR
>
> "JerMe" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:43ec1e29$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Basic
2.0
>
|
Feb 11, 2006, 1:25am
Are you running the world server on the same machine?
Usually, if the world server is local, delays are practically cut out
completely.
[View Quote]"dm mercury" <dmmercury at houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:43ed06b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>I have a vb programmed chat bot that has less than a 1ms delay, from time
>to
> get the info from server process it and relay it back. Even 56k users
> cant
> notice the difference. And the bot is running in the interpreter its not
> even a complete compile, AND active worlds is open, along with many other
> things.
>
> Little do people know that C++ and VB both compile to the same
> "meta-language" before being translated into assembly, and then binary.
> This is true of Microsoft compilers with default options.
>
> It is not the language that matters, it is the underlying concepts and
> understanding. If you understand the concepts, and how the computer
> operates, adopting a new language should not be very difficult, it is just
> a
> matter of syntax. The language is really only an issue when conceptually
> the language you are trying to use can not easily accomplish the desired
> task. An example would be trying to make true sentient artifical
> intelligence in C++.
>
> DM
>
> "Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:43ec774a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> is
> Basic
> 2.0
>
>
|
Feb 11, 2006, 6:57am
nope world server is remote.
DM
[View Quote]"equin0x" <xeroer at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:43ed590c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Are you running the world server on the same machine?
>
> Usually, if the world server is local, delays are practically cut out
> completely.
>
> "dm mercury" <dmmercury at houston.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:43ed06b4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
not
other
just
conceptually
has
crap
email.
>
>
|
|