|
|
didn't know (Bots)
didn't know // Bots
Dec 5, 2001, 11:09pm
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c0ec01d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You obviously haven't used anything besides windows,
|
Yes, I have. I am a great supporter of the "linux cause". I have Darwin on
my mac, and had linux, until a while ago on another machine. When I get
around to it, its going on this machine. I may not be a hardcore addict
like you, but I do know my stuff.
> I told you this site is
> based soley on fact.. the person there is a computer science expert.
Did I ever say he wasnt? :)
> He's
> been around longer then you have, and has been around computers then you
> have.
Are you sure about that?
> I'm using Windows now because I can't run the server in linux without
> having a windows admin tool.. which I can't get access to a windows
computer
> otherwise.
Ok, so, use WINE.
> Have you even read the site, or tried to look at the info?
Why, yes I did have a look at it. My arguement about the knife salesman
still stands about the front article. The only use for the site that I
found is the list of non-microsoft operating systems, although not complete,
it is still, somewhat massive.
> no didn't think so, it's all based on fact.
Suuuure it is.
> And no Microsoft doesn't have to
> follow the rules, they've broken so many anti-trust laws it's not even
> funny..
They were taken to court, they lost, but then won. They still, won. Sure,
they lost in the begining, but the appeals court said that they were free,
they won.
> OEM payoffs, charging companys for every computer they make.. etc
> al. Microsoft does pay off companies to write good reviews for them.. See
> the new XP commercial? No where on it does it say "Windows XP will not
allow
> you to fly" so they're making people belive XP allows them to fly ;).
Think, use commen sense. Have you ever seen another human fly? Its so fake
you can almost see the cables that hold them up.
> Perhaps you should read and try linux, macs, BSD before you say microsoft
is
> the best.
Uhm, excuse me? I am a hardcore mac user, I also love linux and what its
doing. I spent a week 600 miles from home and spent enough money to live
for a month to learn the fundimentials of linux. I not another anti-linux
person.
> Any program in windows has a counterpart in *nix or macs, most
> games are compatible in Macintosh.. and all the games that aren't are
WINE compatible.
Ok, does Activeworlds have its counterpart in unix, linux, darwin, OS9?
Maybe atmosphere... Thats still a far way aways from AW.
> Even try to do that yet? nope, good job. As xelnaga said after
> I asked why don't people realize what bad things microsoft does "Do babies
> realize how bad formula milk is for them?" Good stuff Xel.
If it was bad for them, wouldnt it not be on the market? :)
> I'm done with
> this now.. don't reply.. but even that's futile since there's a 99% chance
> you won't listen. Sorry I had to rant yet again.
Oh, but I am listening. You also wernt ranting, there are plenty of other
people that would have gutted me alive in here for saying that I liked
microsoft.
-Joe
>
> --Bowen--
> Protest XP, the new age rental operating system.
>
[View Quote]> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0e6ca4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
internet
that
> microsoft
to
kill
> a
> mine.
> ARE
> that
an
> against
news
> obvious.
> linux.
> is
of
added
would
> crashes?
views
> as
> for
crap
> platform
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 12:19am
Ya see here's the issue I have you "its either black or its white" type of
people. No-one here is claiming to be "pro-Microsoft", just not
"anti-Microsoft". Why does everyone have to have the same extreme views you
do?
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c0ec01d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Perhaps you should read and try linux, macs, BSD before you say microsoft is
the best.
Dec 6, 2001, 12:33am
Thought I said not to respond.. oh wait no one pays attention.. Right..
Since this is turning into a personal attack, I'm asking you nicely to stop
with this thread.
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3c0ed5c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Ya see here's the issue I have you "its either black or its white" type of
> people. No-one here is claiming to be "pro-Microsoft", just not
> "anti-Microsoft". Why does everyone have to have the same extreme views
you
> do?
>
>
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0ec01d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
> Perhaps you should read and try linux, macs, BSD before you say microsoft
is
> the best.
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 12:53am
Well... theres been a lot of "supposed" conspericys such as the Illumiti (My
favorite) Aliens... Microsoft taking over the computer world... and so on.
Im for some of the Microsoft programs (Im not being paid to do this ether
>:) ) And want to see hard evidence that Microsoft is pure evil and all
lies... and is bent on taking over the market (But who dont want to run the
market?) Maybe if some people took the time to research the facts and look
it up and not believe the first thing they hear the world would be a better
place.
I cant say Microsoft is perfect or anything (No one is, or will be) And have
don't some sleazy things. And so have many other companies. Ide like to see
some company thats perfict and everyone should be like. . . Also just
because you dont like something dosn't make it evil or bad, just means you
dont like it.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TrekkerX
Commatron & Athnex
http://www.commatron.com
http://www.athnex.com
[View Quote]"foxmccloud" <FoxMcCloud at cyberbrain.com> wrote in message
news:3c0a726a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Now show some respect to the (many) people that took time to answer your
question, and READ their answers.
> And if you have anything to say about one of the aforementioned answers,
click on your Outlook Express's Reply To Group button, as
> opposed to New Message.
>
> Remember to only post if you think that the particular message you want ot
send or the answers you expect to receive from it might
> be helpful to the community. Posting that you did not know something does
little in that regard. If it is related to any of the
> messages posted in the last few days, select the corresponding thread and
click on Reply To Group. If there is no related thread
> from the last few days, select New Message. Try not to reply to topics
more than 1 or 2 months old.
>
> I don't want to offend you, everyone makes mistakes at the beginning. Just
try to learn from them. :)
>
> Fox Mc Cloud
>
> "goten362" <goten362 at hotmail.com> a écrit dans le message news:
3c0a6532 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 11:19am
Who do you think you are then - telling people to stop posting? And where
was ther personal attack?
Am I to assume from you're silence that you have no reasons to share with us
that VC++ is a crap compiler and that, apart from maybe a dodgy company that
builds and distributes the product, that people should not be deterred from
using it if that is their preference?
If there is some reason to avoid it, then that is useful information here
.... or is this why you are keen to kill the thread all of a sudden?
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c0ed90f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Thought I said not to respond.. oh wait no one pays attention.. Right..
> Since this is turning into a personal attack, I'm asking you nicely to
stop
> with this thread.
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0ed5c2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
of
> you
microsoft
> is
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 4:21pm
Because I'm done arguing a point that's true. And done arguing when I said
do not reply and you still did, let the thread die. I never said to any one
person that their view was wrong.. nor singled out someone, you did, you
singled out me. That is a personal attack, mine was stating the facts that
I've witnessed and viewed. Now, let me try this again, DO NOT REPLY. Or
will you not follow simple directions.. even after I asked nicely before
this one.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3c0f7046$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Who do you think you are then - telling people to stop posting? And where
> was ther personal attack?
>
> Am I to assume from you're silence that you have no reasons to share with
us
> that VC++ is a crap compiler and that, apart from maybe a dodgy company
that
> builds and distributes the product, that people should not be deterred
from
> using it if that is their preference?
>
> If there is some reason to avoid it, then that is useful information here
> ... or is this why you are keen to kill the thread all of a sudden?
>
>
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0ed90f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> stop
type
> of
views
> microsoft
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 5:38pm
if they know how it works, it means they know the secret little things the
MS slaves have programmed in... MS is like slavery, some ppl try to abolish
it, others don't see what wrong with it, cuzz it happens to please them...
KAH
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d646e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I haven't had any problems with Microsoft VC++. And I support the
products.
> Yeah, I want see some evidence that there programs are illegal, or
> something. The windows C/C++ compiler for MSVC++ is made by Microsoft (The
> same people that made the Win 9x/ NT/ ME and XP) So they know how the
stuff
> works. There's a lot of documentation, and help on the platform and
> development and using the software such as VC++ and FoxPro and J++ ect...
>
> There software is expecive but if you have a studient ID, and some people
> that are teachers you can get student/teacher editions wich is basicly
> cheiper....
>
>
> Also the debug editions of the compiled exe is way diffrent from the
> release.... If you want me to explain the diffrences e-mail me :) So if
you
> look at the Debug compaierd to the Release
> --
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> TrekkerX
> Commatron & Athnex
> http://www.commatron.com
> http://www.athnex.com
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0d51f4 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Unix
I
The
> after
> by
before
still
> on
> crashed
> in
this
> you
> one,
just
> much,
so
> I
in
the
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 7:41pm
And your comments on VC++? Totally unforthcoming. Pathetic.
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c0fb725$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Because I'm done arguing a point that's true. And done arguing when I
said
> do not reply and you still did, let the thread die. I never said to any
one
> person that their view was wrong.. nor singled out someone, you did, you
> singled out me. That is a personal attack, mine was stating the facts
that
> I've witnessed and viewed. Now, let me try this again, DO NOT REPLY. Or
> will you not follow simple directions.. even after I asked nicely before
> this one.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0f7046$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
where
with
> us
> that
> from
here
Right..
to
> type
> views
>
>
|
Dec 6, 2001, 11:17pm
He seems hate companys with a larger than 75% grasp on the market, and
monolpys... He hates them all it seems like. He dont like DishNetwork cuz
they own all the satellite companys and there the only ones left. Seemingly
Microsoft is a huge company but is not a monolpy... there are thousdands of
software develpors out there Many we all know and some we dont. So whats
wrong with microsoft??? Maby its because there a big company that makes a
lot of money we want... Or maby there just selling things better and other
people cant make enought money to compete so they think there evil...
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TrekkerX
Commatron & Athnex
http://www.commatron.com
http://www.athnex.com
[View Quote]"grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:3c0fe5ed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And your comments on VC++? Totally unforthcoming. Pathetic.
>
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0fb725$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> said
> one
> that
Or
> where
> with
company
> here
> Right..
> to
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:00am
Omfg are you stupid? There are only 2 Desktop Marketed Operating systems..
unless every software developer in the country has made an operating system,
they're not in competition with microsoft or apple. Linux is a free OS so
don't say that's one of them. And let me explain this to you again DishNet
is not the only satilite company, in order for it to be a monopoly as well
it'd need to be the only company in the world to offer TV entertainment
services.. but there is TimeWarner, DirectTV, DishNet, Cox cable, etc etc.
I'm tired of discussing this with you, Microsoft is a monopoly because it
itself holds more then 75% on the Desktop market, while apple holds little
over 15% and Mac OS X only works on the macintosh systems, not on PCs so
Micrsoft IS the only company that *sells* the desktop for the intel
compatible computer. (don't say IBM's OS/2 is pretty much a windows clone it
was built and designed by Microsoft for IBM) And I'm going to point back to
linux and other Unix clones in saying it's a free OS, thus it doesn't hold
part of the market. Now let this freaking thread die.. it's long enough as
it is. Windows is not better, I've already stated that you can do the exact
same things in other operating systems that are free. Ease of use and
installation is no longer difficult with Linux as well. These aren't
wayward facts read off the internet, they're truth, so don't use that point
again. Unless you can explicitly prove otherwise with a non-ms sponsered
site. (that includes AZ.net and download.com -- news sites like CNN would
be the place to look) Now, die thread.
--Bowen--
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
news:3c1018c7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> He seems hate companys with a larger than 75% grasp on the market, and
> monolpys... He hates them all it seems like. He dont like DishNetwork cuz
> they own all the satellite companys and there the only ones left.
Seemingly
> Microsoft is a huge company but is not a monolpy... there are thousdands
of
> software develpors out there Many we all know and some we dont. So whats
> wrong with microsoft??? Maby its because there a big company that makes a
> lot of money we want... Or maby there just selling things better and other
> people cant make enought money to compete so they think there evil...
>
> --
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> TrekkerX
> Commatron & Athnex
> http://www.commatron.com
> http://www.athnex.com
> "grimble" <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> wrote in message
> news:3c0fe5ed$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
any
you
> Or
before
> company
deterred
nicely
white"
extreme
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:32am
Darwin, Mac OS X, does work on intel x86 processors :). Read up before you
fly off the handle. Linux is a free OS, but in some cases, its not, you can
purchase different kernels. You also seem to think that theres only linux,
winblows, and Macintosh operating systems. What about HP-UX, Unix, FreeBSD,
and all the other operating systems? Those are commonly used, not as much
as linux, but they are still used a lot. I know windows is not better, but,
as you say, more than 75% of the world runs on it, so, blend in, stop going
bitch-nuts because someone likes Microsoft. Your not going to change their
ways. Its ok... We are still waiting for a valid list of what makes VC++
bad... Provide it, and this thread will die.
-Joe
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c1022d9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Omfg are you stupid? There are only 2 Desktop Marketed Operating systems..
> unless every software developer in the country has made an operating
system,
> they're not in competition with microsoft or apple. Linux is a free OS so
> don't say that's one of them. And let me explain this to you again
DishNet
> is not the only satilite company, in order for it to be a monopoly as well
> it'd need to be the only company in the world to offer TV entertainment
> services.. but there is TimeWarner, DirectTV, DishNet, Cox cable, etc etc.
> I'm tired of discussing this with you, Microsoft is a monopoly because it
> itself holds more then 75% on the Desktop market, while apple holds little
> over 15% and Mac OS X only works on the macintosh systems, not on PCs so
> Micrsoft IS the only company that *sells* the desktop for the intel
> compatible computer. (don't say IBM's OS/2 is pretty much a windows clone
it
> was built and designed by Microsoft for IBM) And I'm going to point back
to
> linux and other Unix clones in saying it's a free OS, thus it doesn't hold
> part of the market. Now let this freaking thread die.. it's long enough
as
> it is. Windows is not better, I've already stated that you can do the
exact
> same things in other operating systems that are free. Ease of use and
> installation is no longer difficult with Linux as well. These aren't
> wayward facts read off the internet, they're truth, so don't use that
point
> again. Unless you can explicitly prove otherwise with a non-ms sponsered
> site. (that includes AZ.net and download.com -- news sites like CNN would
> be the place to look) Now, die thread.
>
> --Bowen--
>
> "trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
> news:3c1018c7 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
cuz
> Seemingly
> of
a
other
<snip>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:44am
Mac OS X isn't designed to work on Intel x86.. you read up.. it's designed
for Macintosh archs. Darwin BSD is designed for it but the coding for OSX
doesn't allow it.
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c102a2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Darwin, Mac OS X, does work on intel x86 processors :). Read up before
you
> fly off the handle. Linux is a free OS, but in some cases, its not, you
can
> purchase different kernels. You also seem to think that theres only
linux,
> winblows, and Macintosh operating systems. What about HP-UX, Unix,
FreeBSD,
> and all the other operating systems? Those are commonly used, not as much
> as linux, but they are still used a lot. I know windows is not better,
but,
> as you say, more than 75% of the world runs on it, so, blend in, stop
going
> bitch-nuts because someone likes Microsoft. Your not going to change
their
> ways. Its ok... We are still waiting for a valid list of what makes VC++
> bad... Provide it, and this thread will die.
>
> -Joe
>
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c1022d9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
systems..
> system,
so
> DishNet
well
etc.
it
little
clone
> it
back
> to
hold
> as
> exact
> point
sponsered
would
> cuz
thousdands
whats
makes
> a
> other
> <snip>
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:50am
Limme explain do your home work next time... Dish Net is the only one
left... TimeWarner dont exist no more, nether Does PrimeStar... DirectTV is
still around but Dish Net bought them... so technaly Dishnetwork owns all of
them.Also Direct TV Ownd primestar before dish owned them.
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TrekkerX
Commatron & Athnex
http://www.commatron.com
http://www.athnex.com
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c102d1f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Mac OS X isn't designed to work on Intel x86.. you read up.. it's designed
> for Macintosh archs. Darwin BSD is designed for it but the coding for OSX
> doesn't allow it.
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102a2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
> can
> linux,
> FreeBSD,
much
> but,
> going
> their
VC++
> systems..
OS
> so
> well
entertainment
> etc.
> it
> little
so
> clone
> back
> hold
enough
> sponsered
> would
and
DishNetwork
> thousdands
> whats
> makes
evil...
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:54am
LMFAO time warner still exists.. try AOL dumbass.. sorry I can't take this
anymore.. that's how stupid you are. Dishnet doesn't even come close to
owning time warner.
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
news:3c102e84 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Limme explain do your home work next time... Dish Net is the only one
> left... TimeWarner dont exist no more, nether Does PrimeStar... DirectTV
is
> still around but Dish Net bought them... so technaly Dishnetwork owns all
of
> them.Also Direct TV Ownd primestar before dish owned them.
>
> --
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> TrekkerX
> Commatron & Athnex
> http://www.commatron.com
> http://www.athnex.com
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102d1f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
designed
OSX
before
you
> much
better,
> VC++
> OS
as
> entertainment
etc
because
PCs
> so
doesn't
> enough
the
and
aren't
that
> and
> DishNetwork
and
> evil...
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:56am
Not as a TV satellite company it dont >:) Stupid AOL
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TrekkerX
Commatron & Athnex
http://www.commatron.com
http://www.athnex.com
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c102f4e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LMFAO time warner still exists.. try AOL dumbass.. sorry I can't take this
> anymore.. that's how stupid you are. Dishnet doesn't even come close to
> owning time warner.
>
> "trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102e84 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> is
all
> of
> designed
> OSX
> before
> you
as
> better,
stop
change
operating
free
again
> as
> etc
> because
holds
> PCs
intel
windows
point
> doesn't
> the
> and
> aren't
> that
CNN
market,
left.
So
that
> and
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:58am
It's an entertainment company.. which exists as AOL - TimeWarner.. it still
exists..
my last post to this thread
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
news:3c102fec at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not as a TV satellite company it dont >:) Stupid AOL
>
> --
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> TrekkerX
> Commatron & Athnex
> http://www.commatron.com
> http://www.athnex.com
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102f4e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
this
DirectTV
> all
for
not,
only
Unix,
> as
> stop
> change
makes
> operating
> free
> again
monopoly
cable,
> holds
on
> intel
> windows
> point
long
do
use
> CNN
> market,
> left.
dont.
> So
> that
better
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 1:00am
Not satellite TV enterinment by way of Television
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -
TrekkerX
Commatron & Athnex
http://www.commatron.com
http://www.athnex.com
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c103065$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> It's an entertainment company.. which exists as AOL - TimeWarner.. it
still
> exists..
> my last post to this thread
> "trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102fec at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> this
to
one
> DirectTV
owns
> for
> not,
> only
> Unix,
not
> makes
Operating
a
> monopoly
> cable,
> on
> long
can
> do
> use
use
non-ms
like
are
> dont.
> better
there
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 1:02am
If your talking about the GUI, yes. But everything else is in the x86
build. You can also solve the problem of the GUI with setting up Xwindows
on top. Easy.
-Joe
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c102d1f$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Mac OS X isn't designed to work on Intel x86.. you read up.. it's designed
> for Macintosh archs. Darwin BSD is designed for it but the coding for OSX
> doesn't allow it.
> "joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
> news:3c102a2d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
> can
> linux,
> FreeBSD,
much
> but,
> going
> their
VC++
> systems..
OS
> so
> well
entertainment
> etc.
> it
> little
so
> clone
> back
> hold
enough
> sponsered
> would
and
DishNetwork
> thousdands
> whats
> makes
evil...
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 1:26am
my god who the hell cares
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <zac at commatron.com> wrote in message
news:3c1030b2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not satellite TV enterinment by way of Television
>
> --
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> TrekkerX
> Commatron & Athnex
> http://www.commatron.com
> http://www.athnex.com
> "bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
> news:3c103065$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> still
take
close
> to
> one
> owns
it's
coding
up
its
theres
> not
not
in,
> Operating
is
> a
you
monopoly
apple
not
the
to
it
> can
of
These
> use
> non-ms
> like
ones
> are
company
> there
>
>
|
Dec 7, 2001, 12:26pm
Lets get away fromall that dish network and OS talk...
Bowen, what is so bad about MSVC++ in your view?
Grims.
[View Quote]"bowen" <bowen at omegauniverse.com> wrote in message
news:3c0d16a5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
MSVC++ is not a good compiler
Dec 22, 2001, 6:14am
Have you ever
> been required to send in cards to use your refrigerator after 12 weeks
But you OWN your fridge. You only license the Microsoft product.
Dec 22, 2001, 11:47am
If you're paying a good $150+ for an operating system or other service.. it
should be yours, not theirs.
[View Quote]"wings" <glenn61 at earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:3c2440e8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Have you ever
>
> But you OWN your fridge. You only license the Microsoft product.
>
>
|
Dec 23, 2001, 1:15am
And you accept that? I don't.
Fox Mc Cloud
"wings" <glenn61 at earthlink.net> a écrit dans le message news: 3c2440e8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Have you ever
>
> But you OWN your fridge. You only license the Microsoft product.
>
>
|
