1  2  3  4  |   Order by index

Jan 29, 2006, 5:05am

ok.. so it's an "in group" joke.

Of course, when I mention what I'm saying is a "theory" it usually is just
that - a guess.


[View Quote]

Mar 12, 2006, 10:26pm

Um, no. SL's vehicles blow away AW's pathetic "movers" easily.

I am somewhat impressed with AW4+'s improved interface, particles, and zones. However, The object properties box is even worse--it's
still too wide and now it's even longer. It could be designed so much better. While AW still has a long way to go before it can
compete with Second Life (SL), it's showing promise and potential (still). However, I think AW and SL should just merge.

This SL forum post (not sure if non-SLers can access it) outlines AW 4.1's features compared to SL's (and see my 3D Game Comparison
for a link to a virtual world comparison between AW, SL, and There).

[View Quote]

Mar 12, 2006, 10:32pm

It SHOULD be way better considering it took 3+ years! But, for 3+ years in development it's just quite pathetic. Entire GAMES are
developed in 3 years, not just a measily upgrade!

Worked perfectly? Try the vehicles--specifically, the jetski (the red one out in front)--it floats up as soon as you get on it. The
vehicles control like crap too. No engine sound or anything either. GTA3/VC/SA AW4+'s vehicles are NOT!

[View Quote]

Mar 13, 2006, 6:02am

[View Quote] But with 1 main programmer? Expected to do *everything*?

PP3D Browser pwns AW in many respects.

--
- Mark Randall
http://www.temporal-solutions.co.uk

"We're Systems and Networks..."
"It's our job to know..."

1  2  3  4  |   Order by index