ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
The Human Condition (Community)
The Human Condition // Communitythe ladyMay 3, 2003, 6:18pm
There are people that visit Active Worlds interested in the human condition.
If these problems aren't addressed fairly and vigorously, I intend to find out who they represent and am going to send them all of these violations. Nobody should have to be a citizen under these conditions. daphneMay 4, 2003, 4:43am
*exasperated sigh*
You don't ever HAVE to be a citizen of AW under ANY condition.... You are never forced to turn your computer on and log into this program... No one forced you to pay for a citizen account either... If you really think there are so very many problems with AW as you imply with your many complaints then please do feel free not to trouble your soul with AW any more.. I'm sure AW never meant to cause you, personally, such angst as you have been demonstrating!!! [View Quote] mongoMay 4, 2003, 6:00am
I agree with you 100% Daphne. The Lady got the answer to her question,
directly from ENZO, in the thread "What citizens want". In case you are unaware of it, ENZO is about as high up on the food chain as you'll get in AW corporate. The economics for AW aren't the rosiest in the world. Their staff is currently down to 6, if my reading of the NG posts is accurate. They are surviving, where many programs before them have folded up shop. They might not be doing everything fairly. They might not oversee all community groups with the vigilence they've exercised in the past. They're fighting to survive, period - and the fact they are still afloat as a corporate entity is appreciated by some of us. Life isn't fair. Logging into AW isn't really representative of real life anyways - it's a program on a computer, and it's a sheer luxury for those that participate. If the inequities in this online venue causes you such personal grief, you do not have to log onto AW. I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for fairness and equality in AW, or in the volunteer organizations that currently exist in the browser. Of course, that's just my opinion - and I've been known to be a tad cynical. My pointed sarcasm at your Christian references was not my disrespect for Christianity, it was my laughing at using it to buttress a point of view rapidly degrading to hyperbole and NG spam. Good luck - :) [View Quote] kahMay 4, 2003, 8:43am
"the lady" <thelady263414 at hotmail.com> wrote in
news:3eb42429 at server1.Activeworlds.com: > There are people that visit Active Worlds interested in the human > condition. If these problems aren't addressed fairly and vigorously, I > intend to find out who they represent and am going to send them all of > these violations. Nobody should have to be a citizen under these > conditions. What? Now you lost me. You also seem to confuse citizen rights in the real world, and "citizen" rights in AW. KAH PS. Please calm down, no need to start a thread every five minutes :-)) johnMay 4, 2003, 9:20am
We pay for cits - if we wanted to do something about it then we would,
frankly - if you aren't happy about it then don't be a cit. [View Quote] goddess innieMay 4, 2003, 4:36pm
okay, i just have to ask...........you are going to violate them for being
interested in the human condition? Ummmm, doesnt that include EVERYONE? I mean, we are all human, and obviosly we are interested in our condition, hence the reason we still exist, therefor, we are all in violation. And, pray tell, what does this have to do with AW? What makes you think we represent someone just because we are humans in a condition? And please, please, I gotta know, what is the violation you are going to issue? LMAO, you are a nut! [View Quote] johnMay 4, 2003, 5:23pm
sweMay 4, 2003, 6:05pm
johnMay 4, 2003, 6:20pm
|
