1  |   Order by index

Dec 20, 2001, 1:30am

Nate007 (Citizen 323763) vandalized in ASunBeam lately.
It is set to free building during christmas time

--
"_
|
/\
\ /
__/ /_

Dec 20, 2001, 2:06am

In my travels in cyberland, I've met many nates. All of them have been
trouble makers. Strange that.

Dec 20, 2001, 2:16am

[View Quote] > Nate007 (Citizen 323763) vandalized in ASunBeam lately. It is set to free building during Christmas time.

I've run into Nate several times, and every time I see him he's always stirring up trouble. Nate007 is also involved in the ATA (ActiveWorlds "terrorist" association).

--
Shred
"Keep your words sweet, in case you have to eat them."

Dec 20, 2001, 2:32am

Yes be vary careful with that guy, hes been in the dreamlandpark universe
also under the same name, completely wrecked a free build world.
He started at the GZ and duplicated objects all over the world.
But noone has his IP for a universe block.
If any know it please let me know what it is thanks.


[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 3:12am

If you get there before I do, block his dumb ass.


[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 12:35pm

I don't think that Nate has done bad enough things for a universe block.
Sure, he's vandalized some GZ's and such, but as he has a static IP,
ejection from the world that's affected would be sufficient. Really, the
only things that would constitute a universe block seem to be harassment,
misuse of AW services (logging in 50 bots to raise a world's user count with
a hacked SDK) or illegal activities like credit card fraud.

[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 1:27pm

Sure thing Brant, world bans from the worlds effected would be sufficient
unless as you state activities relating to illegal activities have been
proven, proven been the operative word here, and then let AWcorp handle the
situation.

World owners can insert IP on ban lists as their right As Data is the
Technical support board member for dreamlandpark he should be aware of the
procedure to acquire a members IP number. But reinstating a world ban from
the proven worlds that have been vandalised would be suffice.

Then prove is any illegal client or methods have been used.
[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 2:48pm

Maybe Nate007 is bored and needs some projects:)

Dec 20, 2001, 3:22pm

strange , but how did I post in both this topic and the vary same topic over
in world builders, just looked and my 1st reply to this topic was also
relayed to that topic aswell, I only replayed to this one LOL


[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 3:24pm

lol there it went again, what, if the topic is the same it auto adds to all
of them?


[View Quote]

Dec 20, 2001, 4:01pm

I crossposted to Community and Worldbuilders because
I saw it related to both. By default a reply goes to
all groups where the refence went to.
I removed "worldbuilders" in this one so it goes only
"ommunity". You left the default unchanged so it went
to both.

[View Quote] --
"_
|
/\
\ /
__/ /_

Dec 20, 2001, 7:50pm

I haven't come across this guy (yet) and don't have particularly strong
views on what to do about it, but I do have one point to make here.
Unfortunately, all that banning someone from a world that they have
vandalised achieves is to make it someone elses problem ... so he moves on,
causing the problem for someone else. This doesn't sound like an accident
since it appears he's been at it in a number of places, so its malicious.

No solutions from me, just that point to raise.

Grims

[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index