1  |   Order by default

Oct 8, 2001, 2:46pm

The site looks good;easy to navigate.Keep up the good work:)
cozmo <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3bbf8e51$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I've got the new front page for the Cozmo-X website pretty much done. I
just
> want you to know that this is not final and most of the links do not work
> yet. Alls i want is some feedback if you don't mind on how the layout and
> colors look The template is the very top and bottom so that part will
appear
> on every page, the middle is the content, and all the pages will most
likely
> have the same color scheme.
>
> If your wondering, Cozmo-X has been in existance for 3 or more months now
> under a few other names. This name is final. We primarily do hosting and
> bots. But i added a few extra things on the site.
>
> There is:
>
> Hosting - Worlds, Object Path leasing, and others. I will not realease the
> price yet.
>
> News - AW news, website news, any other news and articles.
>
> Bots - I am in the middle of several programming projects right nwo whitch
i
> will not discuss. This would be where the primary place for distributing
my
> bots, scripts, and any other bot related things.
>
> Downloads - Lists of usefull programs like activeworlds utilities, RWX
> utilities, bots, and other programs.
>
> Listings - Lists of all AW sites (i'll try hehe), bot sites, object sites,
> and other sites put into categories of use.
>
> Reviews - I hope to write reviews for a lot of things like bots, new
> programs, services, etc.
>
> Forums - I'm working on this one but it will proboly be a little later on
> until its done. Here you'll be abel to post comments, feedback, and
whatever
> else you want.
>
> So thats what i've gotten so far. The names will most likeley change later
> on and i'm hoping to get my domain name up and running after i've
completed
> it.
>
> http://cozmo-x.zapto.org (for now)
>
> --
> - Cozmo Of Cozmo-X
> http://cozmo-x.zapto.org
> World: A'Dude
>
>

Jun 11, 2002, 12:28pm

Nov 8, 2001, 1:48am

http://objects.activeworlds.com/downloads/awb22.exe seems to work still.

tyberius <tyberius at cinci.rr.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3be87c82 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> would anyone happen to know where you can get the old version 2.2? trying
to
> run it on an old comp and 3.2 keeps telling me not enough vid memory,
never
> had the prob when I ran 2.2 off of it.
>
> Thx in advance
> Tyberius
>
>

Dec 26, 2001, 8:58pm

Just curious how the community feels.I was in a G-rated world and said
"damn,I will expire today" and was warned not to use such language,because
children might be present.In the same world slaves was flirting with their
masters and other cubes.I found an article about damn :
http://www.what-the-hell-is-hell.com/HellEncyclopedia/WordDamn.htm ,so judge
for yourself..I just hate hypocrire people who thinks they are the entire
ass when in fact they only are the hole.

Newbie aka CD

Dec 27, 2001, 10:29pm

It happened in Castles.
dotar sojat <barsoom at my.activeworlds.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3C2B86A0.54617777 at my.activeworlds.com...
> OK I just have one question for you "newbie" what world did this happen
in? I
> have heard of a couple of the gor worlds trying to pass themselves off as
> "family" worlds, and they are the only ones I could think of that fit your
> description. But now my trivia spnoge of a mind has to know the correct
answer.
> Why? Oh just cuZ *eyes moff piett*
>
[View Quote]

Dec 31, 2001, 11:03pm

Gott Nytt År alla i activeworlds!

Newbie aka CD
ananas <vha at oct31.de> kirjoitti viestissä:3C305E70.DCF18A13 at oct31.de...
> Hallo Community :)
>
> Ein schoenes Neujahrsfest und ein gesundes und friedliches
> neues Jahr Euch allen, Euren Freunden und Familien
>
> Volker
>
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_

Feb 6, 2002, 10:12pm

Considerable compromise yes,,kind of sad you ppl think that this is a
considerable compromise.I think 6.95$/month is quite much compared to
"Activeworlds will never charge for citizenship".I do not understand why
suddenly this enormous raise;I would have understood if the prices had gone
up a bit each year,since everything gets more expensive.I have not noticed
that server prices nor bandwith costs has raisen within one year that
dramatically.Neither do I belive the wages has gone up in general that much
in USA.I earn about 8000$/year and get along with that,but I guess some ppl
have to earn 200.000$/year to be able to drive a fancy car live in a big
house and god knows what ,,I just wonder why?But I guess some ppl would be
happy if gasoline prices was to go up 600% and then it would only raise
400%.

Strange that you snipped out the important part of my posting and left the
not so importnat beginning.Note also that I said I "would" say,I did not say
I say.

Newbie
grimble <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3c61a4d4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The same could be said of those who fail to recognise a considerable
> compromise on AW's part. Time to accept that things change, people!
>
> Grims
>
[View Quote]

Feb 7, 2002, 12:39am

You must be an american ,right?,,well,,may I ask how many worlds do you have
in AW?
I accept that other have people have different opinions than me about the
pricing,I have nothing against the fact that people are willing to pay ,it
is more the issue that everyone might not be able to do it.I think that it
is sad that Activeworlds is developing into a playground for rich kids and
depressed middleage women.I would rather had seen it to be a place for
anyone to be in and enjoy ,even if you do not own a creditcard.
My opinion simply is that 6.95$/month is ok,but taking away the cits that
has came with the worlds and banning tourists are wrong.I hope I am intitled
to this opinion as a less fortunate (rich) as I accept that the rich and
ignorant has their own view on this.

grimble <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3c61ca68$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> All the views on the pricing and what would/would not be acceptable to
> people was covered a few weeks ago ... so I'm not going to go into all
that
> again, or how individuals value a service they use.
>
> The reason I snipped what you regarded as the "important bit" was because
I
> didn't have anything to say except that its a shame that people will
always
> find something to winge about. You might have seen that part of your post
as
> important ... I didn't.
>
> And if you want to be picky about wording in that fashion ... I said
> "could", and meant the same as your "would". Read it as you will.
>
> Grims
>
>
>
[View Quote]

Feb 7, 2002, 10:09am

okies:) I in general like british people lol.I just give you an example on
how much it would cost me with the new pricing sheme,maybe you then
understand why I am not totally happy with it.

I have 10 worlds if I want to allow tourists in all those it would cost
10x59.95$ =599,50$
I have given away a few cits and payed for them by renewing my worlds plus
used a few cits myself 14x69.95$=979.30$

So,in total this would cost me 1578.80$ MOORE per year than it has so far.If
you do not consider this to be much money,then ok,,maybe you would like to
chip in a bit.But for me this is more than what I can afford.Not sure how
much the raise will affect you,since you did not answer my question,but I
ask you;if you would be in my position,would you be happy with the new
price?

Newbie
grimble <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3c61fe08 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Umm ... no. English actually. Don't stereotype me pal!
>
> And like I said in my previous post, which I thought was perfectly clear
....
> I only remarked on the section of your post that I had any comment on. I
> didn't and STILL DON'T have anything to say on what you find acceptable in
> terms AW's pricing or how highly you value the services that AW provide
and
> you use. If I did have any relevant views, I would have shared them then.
>
> Grims.
>
[View Quote]

Feb 6, 2002, 10:14pm

Yes games,,but activeworlds is not a game,but a chat,,compare to ICQ,Yahoo
etc.

Newbie
cozmo <b.nolan2 at verizon.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3c61a5b8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> actually all online games are $10-$15 a month with the exception of EQ's
new
> $40 a month server where your supposed to get more quests or whatever,
which
> is usually standard in any game bu i guess they are trying to see how much
> people are willing to pay.
>
> But, i think this price is definitly more resonable then before. I kind of
> question there "pay to have tourists enter your world". The only reason
they
> did that is becuase the worldowners thought tourists should be allowed, so
> they foudn the oppurtunity to get soem extra money out of them, but whos
> gonna pay anyways? So basicly only tourists in AWGate unless anyone is
> insane enough to pay that much just to let tourists in, but you never
know.
>
> -Cozmo
>
[View Quote]

Feb 7, 2002, 10:23am

I see it as a chat with features,just trying to indicate that maybe AW
should be add supported for tourists.Problem with AW has been and I still
belive it will be in the future;people do not know about it.My grandmother
who has never touched a PC has heard of ICQ,people who has surfed the web
for years have never heard of activeworlds:When I tell about AW they ask
"what is that?".I would have choosen a different tactic to "sell" it,not
trying to keep it a secret and have those who accidentaly finds it,pay too
much for it.
I have wondered myself why I keep paying for the worlds,but I guess I have
become addicted to building (yes I know one cannot build in ICQ) ,and
building makes it stand out from regular chats.I am prepared to pay for it
yes,but I had rather choosen a way with more users who pay less than a few
users who pay more.

Newbie
grimble <grimble2000 at btinternet.com> kirjoitti
viestissä:3c61fb16$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If you want to compare AW to basic chat/IM Applications, maybe you should
> ask yourself why you paid all that money for all those worlds.
>
> Grims
>
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by default