1  |   Order by default

Jul 24, 1999, 6:11pm

Being able to scale an object's width, length and heigth inside AW.
Should include negative values to mirror the object. Should also
multiply the uv-values. Perhaps add a maximum value so we don't get
really, really huge objects.

Åsmund

Jul 25, 1999, 7:47pm

We should have bots acting like Webcams for virtual places. That way you
could have a webcam for your virtual house instead for your real

Åsmund

[View Quote] > I think AW should hold a Web Cam Contest for everyone who has a web cam.
> The way it works is whoever sends in the best Web Cam pic wins the
> contest and wins a prize.

Aug 4, 1999, 10:24pm

It would be greate to have better controll over lines, like the ones you
get from geometrysampling wireframe. This is one way:

line V1 V2

or perhaps even

line n V1 V2 V3 Vn

also being able to set the width (# of pixels)

Åsmund

Aug 4, 1999, 10:28pm

I wish worldowners could decide where people enter their world.

Åsmund

Aug 4, 1999, 10:33pm

What about letting people rotate the joints of their avatar inside AW...so
you could, ie, manually sit your avatar down.

Åsmund

Aug 4, 1999, 10:38pm

Setting a default midi under world features. Of course, the midi should
loop.

Åsmund

Dec 13, 2000, 4:53am

It's difficult to create objects that looks really good on both versions. Or to put it another way; cool objects on 3.0 (with prelights etc) looks like crap on 2.2. The solution could be to specify one models folder for each version, or even two entire objectpats...or we could just ignore the 2.2 users (my vote)

Dec 14, 2000, 10:55am

of course, thanks

[View Quote] > I have also noticed this and found a fix for it already :-)
>
> whatever command you want AW2.2 to use put it first, and command you want
> AW3 to use put it directly after the 2.2 command with an " #! " before it,
>
> say you have a 3 vertice triangle with prelights on it, and you want it red
> for 2.2 so the prelights show up fully you want to use no world lighting so
> this is what you would do
>
> ModelBegin
> ClumpBegin
> vertex 0 1 0 #! prelight 1 0 0
> vertex .5 0 0 #! prelight 1 1 0
> vertex -.5 0 0 #! prelight 0 1 1
> surface .5 .3 .1
> color 1 0 0
> texture whatever
> #! surface 0 0 0
> #! texture NULL
> triangle 1 2 3
> ClumpEnd
> ModelEnd
>
> its that easy :-)
> --
> -=Hal9000=- world:Discover
> --==~~out~~==--
[View Quote]

Dec 16, 2000, 1:42pm

In the "in world modeling" spirit of eep, if we could get direct controll over the script (like in the web window), it would be a lot easier to experiment with prelight, surface, free rotate etc...anyway I'm not sure if this is the way to go but I think modeling/building should be where the resources are put after 3.1 is finished.

Dec 15, 2000, 1:53pm

Does anyone know the motivation for closing the beta test in the first place? Just the fact that they're saying: you deserve to beta test and you don't, I think, is really bad for the community. If the chosen beta testers have any guts at all they should withdraw. I doubt they'll do it tho'.

[View Quote] > Below is the message I got from Calpantera.
>
> -Agent1
>
> ------------
> Yes it does..
> Only New beta users will be able to post..
>
> Bill
>
[View Quote]

Dec 15, 2000, 7:33pm

I just want to beta test that's all, and I don't think I'm the only one. And by not leting us do it I think they are holding back valueable resources.

[View Quote] > Why? If the beta is public, the people that download it are mostly not going to submit bug reports at all... They download it so they can use it. The point of releasing a beta is to make sure it works before unleashing your creations on the world. It's not "who deserves to and who doesn't", it's "who can help us find bugs?".
>
> Once the closed beta testing is done, the beta will be available to the general public. This allows for the more obscure bugs to be found.
>
> -Agent1
>
[View Quote]

Dec 15, 2000, 8:15pm

ah they haven't chosen the tester yet...just figured since I couldn't read the beta...oh never mind.

[View Quote] > No, they're not holding back anything. Anyway, how do you know you WON'T be a part of the beta? It will be a public beta eventually... Again, the point of a closed beta test is to get people that know what and why they are doing. This has the added advantage of keeping fools out of the beta test for a little while as people who are actually testing do some work. <sarcasm> Maybe there won't be so many idiotic posts asking why their '84 computer won't run Activeworlds... </sarcasm>
>
> -Agent1
> PS - :D (Thrown in just for Eep)
>
[View Quote]

Dec 17, 2000, 9:20pm

I think he meant for people to post requests for him to take their vr pic...not to post actual pictures.

[View Quote] > I hope you are not serious, encouraging people to post pictures in this
> news group !
>
> david14 schrieb:

1  |   Order by default