tired of you know what kind of people? (Community)

Thread

Board Archives

	Bots
	Community
	General Discussion
	Sdk
	Wishlist
	Author Search

Site Features

	Citizens List
	Badges & Achievements
	Events Directory
	News and Articles
	Worlds List
	About Alphaworld
	Search Object Paths

Activeworlds Support

	Download Activeworlds
	Quickstart Tutorial

Historic Archives

	Truespace Archives
	Newsgroup Archives

tired of you know what kind of people? (Community)

tired of you know what kind of people? // Community

the derek

Nov 19, 2000, 12:09am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
ok i have a community (message board/newsgroup) typoe thing on my site
here i can ban people who are...well you [know what kind] of people. if
theres a topic that you want added there is a community request community
(i know that sounds wierd) there and this ng is called community so i dont
think anyone can say this is "off topic"</html>

goober king

Nov 19, 2000, 6:13am

Congratulations, Eep. You've succeeding in alienating yet another NG
user. Who knows? Maybe if you keep this up, there won't be anyone left
in these NG but you. Wouldn't that just be perfect?

I await your flame.

[View Quote] --
Goober King
Is finally starting to tire of Eep's shenanigans after four long
years...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu

the derek

Nov 19, 2000, 6:21am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
lol the boards on my site have just been dead hehe it was an advertising
gimmick lol (did it work?)
[View Quote]

grimble

Nov 19, 2000, 8:28am

No *snore*

[View Quote] lol the boards on my site have just been dead hehe it was an advertising
gimmick lol (did it work?)

eep

Nov 19, 2000, 11:31am

You're still here, eh? Some people are simply able to not act as incompetent as Derek et al all the time. However, you've had your moments...

[View Quote] > Congratulations, Eep. You've succeeding in alienating yet another NG
> user. Who knows? Maybe if you keep this up, there won't be anyone left
> in these NG but you. Wouldn't that just be perfect?
>
> I await your flame.
>
[View Quote]

nornny

Nov 19, 2000, 12:03pm

For starters, you didn't even send an url for your boards so how ever are we
going to be able to locate it?? :)

Nornny

_____________
[View Quote]

goober king

Nov 19, 2000, 6:14pm

I feel so honored.

My point is that these are not *your* newsgroups. These are COF's
newsgroups, and according to the charter, the only rules are 1) keep
posts on-topic, 2) they meet rules of netiquette and polite human
interaction, and 3) posts are appropriate for a group forum (as opposed
to individual emails).

Now, let's review. Did Derek break any rules? Yes, #1. Should he be
reprimanded? Of course. Should he be cussed out and insulted the second
he steps in the door? I think not. That would be breaking rule #2, would
it not? You also constantly bitch about insanely long threads, yet you
are almost always the main contributors to these same threads, since you
just *have* to have the last word. In the above mentioned thread you
have 9 posts out of 27. That's a third of all posts. Another third is
Derek trying to defend himself. The rest are various other people
offering their opinion. (most of them against you) As the thread drags
on, it becomes increasingly clear that it's just you vs. Derek, meaning
you could easily have continued this dispute via email instead of
polluting this NG with your bickering, thereby breaking rule #3. So
who's the bigger offender here?

Now granted, these NGs aren't moderated anymore, but I believe the rules
still stand, and a measure of self-moderation should be enforced. If you
had simply said "Beta NG is strictly for posts about beta bug reports.
Put posts like this in the community NG.", you probably would have
gotten a "oh sorry lol" and that would have been the end of it! But no,
you had to hide behind the excuse that "he got on your nerves" and drag
it out to horrendous lengths, thereby demonstrating even more
incompetence.

And as for these rules applying only to the community NG, I would like
to think these rules implicitly apply to all NGs; just common sense. And
if there's anyone who disagrees with me, (besides you, Eep) speak now
and I'll shut up. Otherwise, I would suggest abiding by these rules
before you make yourself look as incompetent as the rest of us.

[View Quote] --
Goober King
Oh whoops... too late...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu

eep

Nov 19, 2000, 8:38pm

Blah blah blah. Get off the fucking soap box, twit. If I want your opinion I'll BEAT it out of you, eh? I tire of dealing with incessant lamers such as yourself. Suck filter, fanboy.

[View Quote] > I feel so honored.
>
> My point is that these are not *your* newsgroups. These are COF's
> newsgroups, and according to the charter, the only rules are 1) keep
> posts on-topic, 2) they meet rules of netiquette and polite human
> interaction, and 3) posts are appropriate for a group forum (as opposed
> to individual emails).
>
> Now, let's review. Did Derek break any rules? Yes, #1. Should he be
> reprimanded? Of course. Should he be cussed out and insulted the second
> he steps in the door? I think not. That would be breaking rule #2, would
> it not? You also constantly bitch about insanely long threads, yet you
> are almost always the main contributors to these same threads, since you
> just *have* to have the last word. In the above mentioned thread you
> have 9 posts out of 27. That's a third of all posts. Another third is
> Derek trying to defend himself. The rest are various other people
> offering their opinion. (most of them against you) As the thread drags
> on, it becomes increasingly clear that it's just you vs. Derek, meaning
> you could easily have continued this dispute via email instead of
> polluting this NG with your bickering, thereby breaking rule #3. So
> who's the bigger offender here?
>
> Now granted, these NGs aren't moderated anymore, but I believe the rules
> still stand, and a measure of self-moderation should be enforced. If you
> had simply said "Beta NG is strictly for posts about beta bug reports.
> Put posts like this in the community NG.", you probably would have
> gotten a "oh sorry lol" and that would have been the end of it! But no,
> you had to hide behind the excuse that "he got on your nerves" and drag
> it out to horrendous lengths, thereby demonstrating even more
> incompetence.
>
> And as for these rules applying only to the community NG, I would like
> to think these rules implicitly apply to all NGs; just common sense. And
> if there's anyone who disagrees with me, (besides you, Eep) speak now
> and I'll shut up. Otherwise, I would suggest abiding by these rules
> before you make yourself look as incompetent as the rest of us.
>
[View Quote]

goober king

Nov 19, 2000, 8:44pm

Hehehe... predictable as ever. I find it interesting that he'll argue
incessantly with people who do nothing more than say "hi" in the wrong
newsgroup, but if you actually present him with a sound argument, he
gives up and filters you.

There's your solution, folks. You want Eep off your back? Throw some
logic at him! :)

[View Quote] --
Goober King
Also finds it funny, since supposedly he's been filtered before this...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu

imagine

Nov 19, 2000, 9:14pm

Gongrats and welcome to the filtered, flicked group lol
Imagine
[View Quote]

the derek

Nov 20, 2000, 12:23am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
come on wake up! lol
[View Quote]

the derek

Nov 20, 2000, 12:23am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
its in my "off topic" intoduction but  here it is agin
 awbots.findhere.com
 can ya remember it?
[View Quote]

the derek

Nov 20, 2000, 12:24am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
this is called community you cant post "off topic" here in my opinon however
if you would like me to point out all the "off topic" posts like eep i
will be happy to do so
[View Quote]

goober king wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I feel so honored.
My point is that these are not *your* newsgroups. These are COF's
 newsgroups, and according to the charter, the only rules are 1) keep
 posts on-topic, 2) they meet rules of netiquette and polite human
 interaction, and 3) posts are appropriate for a group forum (as opposed
 to individual emails).
Now, let's review. Did Derek break any rules? Yes, #1. Should he be
 reprimanded? Of course. Should he be cussed out and insulted the second
 he steps in the door? I think not. That would be breaking rule #2,
would
 it not? You also constantly bitch about insanely long threads, yet
you
 are almost always the main contributors to these same threads, since
you
 just *have* to have the last word. In the above mentioned thread you
 have 9 posts out of 27. That's a third of all posts. Another third
is
 Derek trying to defend himself. The rest are various other people
 offering their opinion. (most of them against you) As the thread drags
 on, it becomes increasingly clear that it's just you vs. Derek, meaning
 you could easily have continued this dispute via email instead of
 polluting this NG with your bickering, thereby breaking rule #3. So
 who's the bigger offender here?
Now granted, these NGs aren't moderated anymore, but I believe the rules
 still stand, and a measure of self-moderation should be enforced. If
you
 had simply said "Beta NG is strictly for posts about beta bug reports.
 Put posts like this in the community NG.", you probably would have
 gotten a "oh sorry lol" and that would have been the end of it! But
no,
 you had to hide behind the excuse that "he got on your nerves" and
drag
 it out to horrendous lengths, thereby demonstrating even more
 incompetence.
And as for these rules applying only to the community NG, I would like
 to think these rules implicitly apply to all NGs; just common sense.
And
 if there's anyone who disagrees with me, (besides you, Eep) speak now
 and I'll shut up. Otherwise, I would suggest abiding by these rules
 before you make yourself look as incompetent as the rest of us.
eep wrote:
 >
 > You're still here, eh? Some people are simply able to not act as
incompetent as Derek et al all the time. However, you've had your moments...
 >
 > goober king wrote:
 >
 > > Congratulations, Eep. You've succeeding in alienating yet another
NG
 > > user. Who knows? Maybe if you keep this up, there won't be anyone
left
 > > in these NG but you. Wouldn't that just be perfect?
 > >
 > > I await your flame.
 > >
 > > the derek wrote:
 > > >
 > > > ok i have a community (message board/newsgroup) typoe thing on
my site
 > > > here i can ban people who are...well you [know what kind] of
people.
 > > > if theres a topic that you want added there is a community request
 > > > community (i know that sounds wierd) there and this ng is called
 > > > community so i dont think anyone can say this is "off topic"
--
 Goober King
 Oh whoops... too late...
 rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu</blockquote>
</html>

the derek

Nov 20, 2000, 12:25am

<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
....the flicked group....
 hmmmmmm
[View Quote]

imagine wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Gongrats and welcome to the filtered, flicked group
lol
 Imagine
 goober king <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
 <a href="news:3A1852C6.C624407E at acsu.buffalo.edu">news:3A1852C6.C624407E at acsu.buffalo.edu</a>...
 > Hehehe... predictable as ever. I find it interesting that he'll argue
 > incessantly with people who do nothing more than say "hi" in the
wrong
 > newsgroup, but if you actually present him with a sound argument,
he
 > gives up and filters you.
 >
 > There's your solution, folks. You want Eep off your back? Throw some
 > logic at him! :)
 >
 > eep wrote:
 > >
 > > Blah blah blah. Get off the fucking soap box, twit. If I want your
 opinion I'll BEAT it out of you, eh? I tire of dealing with incessant
lamers
 such as yourself. Suck filter, fanboy.
 > >
 > > goober king wrote:
 > >
 > > > I feel so honored.
 > > >
 > > > My point is that these are not *your* newsgroups. These are COF's
 > > > newsgroups, and according to the charter, the only rules are
1) keep
 > > > posts on-topic, 2) they meet rules of netiquette and polite human
 > > > interaction, and 3) posts are appropriate for a group forum (as
 opposed
 > > > to individual emails).
 > > >
 > > > Now, let's review. Did Derek break any rules? Yes, #1. Should
he be
 > > > reprimanded? Of course. Should he be cussed out and insulted
the
 second
 > > > he steps in the door? I think not. That would be breaking rule
#2,
 would
 > > > it not? You also constantly bitch about insanely long threads,
yet you
 > > > are almost always the main contributors to these same threads,
since
 you
 > > > just *have* to have the last word. In the above mentioned thread
you
 > > > have 9 posts out of 27. That's a third of all posts. Another
third is
 > > > Derek trying to defend himself. The rest are various other people
 > > > offering their opinion. (most of them against you) As the thread
drags
 > > > on, it becomes increasingly clear that it's just you vs. Derek,
 meaning
 > > > you could easily have continued this dispute via email instead
of
 > > > polluting this NG with your bickering, thereby breaking rule
#3. So
 > > > who's the bigger offender here?
 > > >
 > > > Now granted, these NGs aren't moderated anymore, but I believe
the
 rules
 > > > still stand, and a measure of self-moderation should be enforced.
If
 you
 > > > had simply said "Beta NG is strictly for posts about beta bug
reports.
 > > > Put posts like this in the community NG.", you probably would
have
 > > > gotten a "oh sorry lol" and that would have been the end of it!
But
 no,
 > > > you had to hide behind the excuse that "he got on your nerves"
and
 drag
 > > > it out to horrendous lengths, thereby demonstrating even more
 > > > incompetence.
 > > >
 > > > And as for these rules applying only to the community NG, I would
like
 > > > to think these rules implicitly apply to all NGs; just common
sense.
 And
 > > > if there's anyone who disagrees with me, (besides you, Eep) speak
now
 > > > and I'll shut up. Otherwise, I would suggest abiding by these
rules
 > > > before you make yourself look as incompetent as the rest of us.
 > > >
 > > > eep wrote:
 > > > >
 > > > > You're still here, eh? Some people are simply able to not act
as
 incompetent as Derek et al all the time. However, you've had your moments...
 > > > >
 > > > > goober king wrote:
 > > > >
 > > > > > Congratulations, Eep. You've succeeding in alienating yet
another
 NG
 > > > > > user. Who knows? Maybe if you keep this up, there won't be
anyone
 left
 > > > > > in these NG but you. Wouldn't that just be perfect?
 > > > > >
 > > > > > I await your flame.
 > > > > >
 > > > > > the derek wrote:
 > > > > > >
 > > > > > > ok i have a community (message board/newsgroup) typoe thing
on
 my site
 > > > > > > here i can ban people who are...well you [know what kind]
of
 people.
 > > > > > > if theres a topic that you want added there is a community
 request
 > > > > > > community (i know that sounds wierd) there and this ng
is called
 > > > > > > community so i dont think anyone can say this is "off topic"
 >
 > --
 > Goober King
 > Also finds it funny, since supposedly he's been filtered before this...
 > rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu</blockquote>
</html>

nornny

Nov 20, 2000, 10:17am

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C052BF.478B0C20
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

That post was so cluttered you couldn't even find your name in it, but =
thanks for the url, it seems easy enough to remember. :)

Nornny
[View Quote] For starters, you didn't even send an url for your boards so how =
ever are we=20
going to be able to locate it?? :)=20
Nornny=20

_____________=20
[View Quote] > community (i know that sounds wierd) there and this ng is called=20
> community so i dont think anyone can say this is "off topic"=20
--=20
Goober King=20
Is finally starting to tire of Eep's shenanigans after four long=20
years...=20
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu

------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C052BF.478B0C20
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>That post was so cluttered you couldn't even find =
your name in=20
it, but thanks for the url, it seems easy enough to remember. =
:)</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Nornny</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"the derek" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:ImTheDerek at yahoo.com">ImTheDerek at yahoo.com</A>> =
wrote in=20
message <A=20
=
href=3D"news:3A18857B.6B71F7F6 at yahoo.com">news:3A18857B.6B71F7F6 at yahoo.co=
m</A>...</DIV>its=20
in my "off topic" intoduction but  here it is agin=20
 awbots.findhere.com can ya remember it?=20
[View Quote] advertising >gimmick lol (did it work?) >goober king =
[View Quote] ------=_NextPart_000_0027_01C052BF.478B0C20--

Awportals.com · ProLibraries Live · Twitter · LinkedIn