ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
TechTalk? (General Discussion)
TechTalk? // General Discussionzeo toxionJul 12, 2002, 10:44pm
Was there a techtalk today? If there was I missed it AGAIN (I do practically
every time). Anything interesting said? Logs? -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- A message from Zeo Toxion -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- strike rapierJul 12, 2002, 10:54pm
Well it was said to be E N Z O talk.. but considering he aint actually in
the company anymore >_< erm... - Mark carlbanksJul 12, 2002, 10:58pm
This is scaring me no more E N Z O and no techtalk. But new programmers who
make browser better. [View Quote] carlbanksJul 12, 2002, 11:23pm
zeo toxionJul 13, 2002, 1:20am
Um... i still want to know if there actuall WAS one... everyone ive asked
seems to have either missed it or doesnt know. Eh whatever...alls i know is the next one will be PRETTY intresting, unless its canceled. -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- A message from Zeo Toxion -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- [View Quote] makiJul 13, 2002, 1:39am
hmm I usually log it but I'm too lazy, I did notice techtalk get higher on
the list, but I dought anyone from awc attended it..I didn't notice enzo on or anything, 9 9 9 seemed to be the only one on, but he has his world hidden...oh well...what happened to last week's too? -- maki www.awmaki.com [View Quote] strike rapierJul 13, 2002, 5:48am
Actually I got challanged by the SDK, why be scared of something you can
have so much control over? Anyhow, dont think im constantly insulting u carl, its just I think your in way over your head and I always see the posts you make that verrify it such as, "I think this may be the beginning of new managment for AW", which is so blacently obvious because it says it on the the document and anyone with a reading age of 8 could work that 1 out. So dont take it personal :) Tis just just the conciquences of age and actions - Me ambivalentJul 13, 2002, 9:58am
[View Quote]
ummmmm.... you and several other people ARE constantly insulting carl.
what are you saying? you want to keep insulting him, but you want him to pretend you're not? >and I always see the posts you make that verrify it such> as, "I think this may be the beginning of new managment for AW", which is so> blacently obvious >because it says it on the the document and anyone with a> reading age of 8 could work that 1 out. ummmmm... i've seen people older than carl make idiotic posts, and without the excuse of age for doing it. (i'm not saying your post was idiotic, carl. it was fine.) > So dont take it personal :) ummmmm.... insulting IS personal. >Tis just just the conciquences of age and> actions are you saying it's natural and okay to constantly insult 12 year old kids? if so, i would have to disagree. i think it's despicable. if you don't like carl's posts, one word: filter. he has every right to post. he's a citizen and a member of this community. strike rapierJul 13, 2002, 12:10pm
If myself and several other people were constantly insulting Carl, we
wouldent be doing it only when he makes a rediclous post on the NG. And yes, ive seen allot of people older than carl who make stupid posts. A reading age of 8 has nothing to do whatsoever with real age its a generalisation of ability. Insulting for the sake of insulting IS person, commenting that includes a oposition to a person or a persons thoughs / comments and is backed up by reasoning is not As for this... It bares no relevance whatsoever and i have no idea where you got it from =oD > are you saying it's natural and okay to constantly insult 12 year old kids? |