|
removing contacts/blocking options (Wishlist)
removing contacts/blocking options // Wishlist
Jun 25, 2004, 1:07pm
I think you should be able to have your blocking options stored, so you can
keep someone blocked *without* having them on your contact list! It is very
annoying because my contact list sometimes gets very full and it bothers me.
Is it really that hard for AW to donate a few kilobytes of extra memory on
each citizen for off-contact list blocking options?!
Jun 25, 2004, 4:01pm
This type of thing has been requested at least 5 times now. It is something
that we would all like to have and I wonder how long it would take AWI to
implement it.
[View Quote]"matt888" <matt_scriven195 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40dc3f9d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I think you should be able to have your blocking options stored, so you
can
> keep someone blocked *without* having them on your contact list! It is
very
> annoying because my contact list sometimes gets very full and it bothers
me.
>
> Is it really that hard for AW to donate a few kilobytes of extra memory on
> each citizen for off-contact list blocking options?!
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2004, 12:23am
A better option would be to make the contact list with a folder tree (much
like the contact list in Xelabot). That way you can group contacts, and
expand the trees for only the contacts you want to see. You could keep
groups of Friends, PKs, Teachers, and Blocked etc.
~ Justin
[View Quote]"matt888" <matt_scriven195 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:40dc3f9d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I think you should be able to have your blocking options stored, so you
can
> keep someone blocked *without* having them on your contact list! It is
very
> annoying because my contact list sometimes gets very full and it bothers
me.
>
> Is it really that hard for AW to donate a few kilobytes of extra memory on
> each citizen for off-contact list blocking options?!
>
>
|
Jun 26, 2004, 1:44am
And make it so that the blocked list does not affect the limit on numbers of
folks on contact list and also that the list itself is not limited in
numbers of folks blocked.
--
Legion
"I think, therefore I am" - Rene Descartes,
17th-century French philosopher, Earth
[View Quote]"just in" <anon at no.spam.com> wrote in message
news:40dcde07 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> A better option would be to make the contact list with a folder tree (much
> like the contact list in Xelabot). That way you can group contacts, and
> expand the trees for only the contacts you want to see. You could keep
> groups of Friends, PKs, Teachers, and Blocked etc.
>
> ~ Justin
>
> "matt888" <matt_scriven195 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:40dc3f9d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> can
> very
> me.
on
>
>
|
Jul 4, 2004, 6:45pm
I agree to those ideas also, I really hope AWI gets around to it!
[View Quote]"legion" <jonsavel at juno.com> wrote in message
news:40dcf122 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> And make it so that the blocked list does not affect the limit on numbers
of
> folks on contact list and also that the list itself is not limited in
> numbers of folks blocked.
>
> --
> Legion
>
> "I think, therefore I am" - Rene Descartes,
> 17th-century French philosopher, Earth
> "just in" <anon at no.spam.com> wrote in message
> news:40dcde07 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
(much
you
is
bothers
memory
> on
>
>
|
Jul 9, 2004, 4:40pm
It shouldn't be too hard to impliment. If floating tabs were easy enough,
this should be no biggie.
Jul 9, 2004, 7:07pm
Easy enough? The floating tabs aren't fully dockable (not using MFC, according to Shamus) and have other problems: http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improve.html#tabpane
[View Quote]ferruccio wrote:
>
> It shouldn't be too hard to impliment. If floating tabs were easy enough,
> this should be no biggie.
|
Jul 18, 2004, 1:35am
It was 3.5 when they added the separate tabs. Your site said 3.4. ;)
[View Quote]"eep" <no at spam.com> wrote in message news:40EF06F1.E98EC10F at spam.com...
> Easy enough? The floating tabs aren't fully dockable (not using MFC,
according to Shamus) and have other problems:
http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improve.html#tabpane
>
> ferruccio wrote:
enough,
|
Jul 18, 2004, 4:18pm
Oops...thanks.
[View Quote]ferruccio wrote:
>
> It was 3.5 when they added the separate tabs. Your site said 3.4. ;)
|
[View Quote]> "eep" <no at spam.com> wrote in message news:40EF06F1.E98EC10F at spam.com...
> according to Shamus) and have other problems:
> http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improve.html#tabpane
|
|