1  |   Order by index

Jan 17, 2003, 5:17pm

Ejections by IP mask....i.e. 172.164.91.* or 172.164.*

Jan 17, 2003, 5:55pm

I thought that was already possable by setting them to zero in the CT
ejections box?

- Mark
[View Quote]

Jan 17, 2003, 6:29pm

[View Quote] Isn't it possible to get a 0 for that number?

I've had 0's for one of the numbers before, I can't remember which.

--Bowen--

Jan 17, 2003, 6:53pm

0s really exist in IP numbers.
19:31:33 "guest" = ip 80.0.185.78

[View Quote]

Jan 17, 2003, 7:13pm

In article <3e2856b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP says...
> Ejections by IP mask....i.e. 172.164.91.* or 172.164.*
>
>

From http://activeworlds.com/help/aw33/world_ejections.html :
"if the last byte of the address is zero, the entire "class C" address is blocked
(e.g. if the blocked address is "1.2.3.0", this will keep out anyone with an IP
address in the range from 1.2.3.0 to 1.2.3.255.)"

--
Baron

Jan 17, 2003, 9:19pm

What about Class-B ejections?
And wouldn't that mean that an ejection placed on 80.0.185.78 ejects
80.24.185.78 etc. as well?

[View Quote]

Jan 18, 2003, 4:00am

In article <3e288f71 at server1.Activeworlds.com>, NCC-71854 at USS-Venture.Starfleet.UFP says...
> What about Class-B ejections?
> And wouldn't that mean that an ejection placed on 80.0.185.78 ejects
> 80.24.185.78 etc. as well?
>

I guess you have to test this but it makes sense that 80.24.0.0 would block 80.24.*.* .
Of course 80.0.185.78 does not block 80.24.185.78 since the "last byte(s) of the address"
is not zero hence such an ejection does not eject an IP block. It would be nice if you could eject
111.222.222.222/12 or 111.222.222.222/18 somehow though.

--
Baron

1  |   Order by index