1  |   Order by index

Nov 29, 2002, 7:10pm

I understand that TZ just wants to be active in the community but this is completly and utterly rediculous. My list is FULL of all his posts to age old topics that are long dead. I ask that you stop replying to age old posts from this point forwards, as it is neither beneficial to you, nor I, nor anyone else. I understand your wanting to be seen as a Newsgroup master so to speak, but replying to every single post is not really required.

- Mark

Nov 30, 2002, 1:37am

Jinkies.

--Bowen--

Dec 1, 2002, 11:57pm

It would apear to me that you are the one who wishes to be considered the master of the newsgroup, since you have taken it upon yourself not only to decide what other people should or should not reply to, but also what topics are dead and what topics are not. I'm not trying to do any such thing, and you can take your personal attack and stick it where ever like, but this is the last time I am bothering to answer you on this redundant topic. As far as I'm concerned "THIS" is a dead topic.

TechnoZeus

[View Quote]

Dec 2, 2002, 1:17am

[View Quote] 4 people have commented on it, not just him. :P

--Bowen--

Dec 2, 2002, 7:29am

To comment is one thing. We all have opinions. To attack me or anyone else personally is another story entirely.

TechnoZeus

[View Quote]

Dec 2, 2002, 4:36pm

Umm I dont see a personal attack?

- Mark

[View Quote]

Dec 4, 2002, 4:43am

Okay, since you can't see it. I will point it out to you carefully:

You said "I understand that TZ just wants to be active in the community but this is completly and utterly rediculous."

Okay, that could be taken more than one way, so even though it looks like an attack to me I'll concede that it may not have been one.

You said "My list is FULL of all his posts to age old topics that are long dead."

Again, not necessarily an attack. You see them as dead, and I do not. We simply disagree.

You said "I ask that you stop replying to age old posts from this point forwards, as it is neither beneficial to you, nor I, nor anyone else."

Again, not really an attack. You made a request, and a judgement about the potential benefits, or lack thereof, that may come from my actions. Personal, yes, but not necessarily an attack.

You then said "I understand your wanting to be seen as a Newsgroup master so to speak, but replying to every single post is not really required."

That was, in my opinion, a personal attack. You have implied, although not directly said, that I am in the habit of replying to "every single post" and have also stated that you understand "my" wanting to be seen as something that I have never wanted to be seen as. If it was not meant as an attack, say so and I will take your word for it... but it definately "looks like" one to me. In the future, please refrain from stating for me what "my" wants are without checking the accuracy of your information. I'm perfectly capable of stating my own intentions and would be happy to do so if asked.

Now you've replied to a topic that I considered dead. Thanks for proving my point... we each make our own decisions about such things.

TechnoZeus


[View Quote]

Dec 4, 2002, 2:45pm

Of course you don't Mark that's just the way you are...:) If YOU do not like TZ's posts then don't read them. It's real simple. Just quit crying about it in public.
The big point is NOBODY is in charge here....not even you.

Leo :)

ps; I for one happen to like TZ's writing style and his ability to pass along the facts very concisely...... even "old" facts take on a new light...:)

[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index