|
|
Browser problem d/l stuff... (Community)
Browser problem d/l stuff... // Community
Feb 19, 2006, 4:35pm
I'm sorry. I have better things to do with my time than waste it with petty
challenges. However, if I find I'm writing something anyway, I will then
accept your challenge - however I'm not stupid enough to waste my resources
otherwise. And if you go "HAH, j00 CANT DO IT!!!111ONEONEONE" - I won't
give a shit, because I'm busy working on something else. Besides, I don't
use C++, and I don't intend to switch to using C++ in the near future - it's
a whole load of needless complication. C# does the job equally well and in
half the effort. and you can say C# stinks as much as you like to, and take
the piss as much as you want, because I'm beyond caring.
As you said yourself - you lost my interest. Things that lose my interest
aren't worth my time, regardless of how much I'd like to rip into them.
Good day, sir.
-Lt
[View Quote]"Strike Rapier" <markyr at gmail.com> wrote in message
news:43f7a91a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Uh.... You really have no idea. Things like AW take *hundreds of
> thousands* or even *millions* of LOC to write. At last count Evo was
> 35,000 and if you include the heavy heavy use of multiline macros that
> pushes it up to about 40,000.
>
> When you have 7 or 8 thousand hours of coding experience behind you. Then
> you can challenge me. Infact what the hell.
>
> I challenge you, produce your own version, C++, everything, Dynamic rights
> system, multimode attributes editing, 100+ commands, god knows how many
> reports, the back end database interface, the XML communication standards,
> the profile management system, the advanced logging capabilities, the
> context sensing menus, the graphical display interfaces, the compressable
> GUI.
>
> Oh, and more than 2 { or } on a line does not count.
>
> See you in 10 years and 80,000 - 10,000 lines of code because I can
> guarentee you cannot code as pure as I can.
>
> - MR
>
> "LtBrenton" <uaf_brenton at concsols.com> wrote in message
> news:43f78ee9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Feb 20, 2006, 11:21am
I think he's post is actually replying to LtBrenton for posting that
Strike's bot is just 'ineffecient' code.
It was me putting the big one on the kid. Which is only really because he
attacked every other person who replied to his initial post.
Oh well, as you said, it can only affect he's business, which apparently
(although proven wrong within the second post of his) he can run as good as
any corporate high-flyer.
-Eeee-quue-knox.
[View Quote]"joeman" <john at fakeplastic.com> wrote in message
news:43f7d336 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Strike, get off your high horse. It doesnt take too long to pick up a
> programming language and be quite adept with it. Also, if one is willing
> to pick up clean and good coding practices at the begining, there's no
> reason they cant produce code just as good as someone who's been
> programming for *years*. Its all how you want to learn, and how you apply
> what you've learned.
>
> I do this for a living, I get paid to produce less code that does more. So
> far I've stayed out of your little hissyfit with this dude selling his
> "bots". Strike, I have some respect for you and what you've done in the
> past, but right now Im telling you to drop it. Seriously. If he wants to
> sell his bots, let him. If they arent any good, word will spread and they
> wont sell. Think about it this way, how would you have felt if someone
> walked up to you when you were first starting to program and said "You're
> no good at it, give up!!".
>
> Also, 7 or 8 *thousand* hours?!?! Thats just under a year of programming
> 24/7. No sleep, no eating, no sex.
>
> Stop pissing all over this kid and his dreams strike.
>
> -Joe
>
|
[clipped]
Jul 20, 2006, 6:43pm
Well whaddaya know, I went C++. :P
-Lt
[View Quote]LtBrenton wrote:
> Besides, I don't
> use C++, and I don't intend to switch to using C++ in the near future - it's
> a whole load of needless complication.
|
|
