1  2  |   Order by index

Aug 22, 2003, 3:12pm

Bruce,
We are not ON the AW program we are on a place where people can voice
their views (as long as they do not include anything illegal, over profanity
etc)... this means, winge from yesterday to tommorow and you will be lucky
if you don't get 100 posts in 6 hours slamming you...

Consider it the equivilent of a slap on the bottom for a kid who never shuts
up and always is own to say his own woes...

One of your biggest problems is you crave attention, you never put anything
decent in your posts, so instead, you start a rediuclous number of new
threads... we could not read your posts.. but then how do we know what
people are on about when they start slamming you for whatever babble you are
on about...

I also feel that you are detached from these newsgroups for everything that
does not include the woe of the worlds (or, specifically, YOUR worlds), hell
you still call me Strike for the love of God (if there was one)...

The similarities between you and TheLady are many, you insult her, and in
responce; those of us who take 5 seconds after we have read a post to digest
it, before ranting plainly see you are 2 of the same.

Just look at some of the crap you have said, and read it as though you were
not you...

You need to realise you, like noone here, is God and the centre of the
universe (unless your E N Z O standing at Alphaworld GZ...)... I remember a
while ago a post about game textures, for none commercial. You decided to
make a post about how YOU and YOUR A!!CT object path wouldent use the object
path and how YOU would only put on things given to them and A!!CT only did
this and A!!CT only did that.. Christ man, in the last 3 hours I've been
speaking on regional radio to a few million people and if I had gone
advertising this like that, id have been kicked off immediatly, so why arn't
you kicked for it...

- Mark

Aug 22, 2003, 4:03pm

I might be a little "nasty", but its all in ASCII. I don't go around
posting rather large pictures of very pointless things. Anyway, I don't see
anything in the TOS against being slightly "nasty" to people that cant take
a little heat. Just be glad I'm not as nasty as that poor little Eep
fellow, he was all "Twit this! Twit that! I'm going to burn the AWCom
offices to the ground! Twit twit twit! Snappatwit! Lalala, look at me! I
hate AWCom, yet I loooove to stay and use their product!".

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 22, 2003, 11:01pm

heh heh heh

Anyway, the picture was "only" 51k :-P and the post was "only" 74k :-P. I
don't see the problem with it unless your on 56k >:-P. J/k, yeah yeah, I was
just making a bad joke. Sorry for doing it, 56kers.
[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 6:39am

Picture loaded fine for me... you should be sorry to people who pay for
bandwidth, not 56kers as they could see the KB under size :-O

~John


[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 10:21am

Then I apologize to the people who pay for bandwidth (-:
[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 3:15pm

How about you PAY the people who have to pay for their internet?

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 5:39pm

I dought one 74KB post is going to overload their bandwidth, which means
there is probably nothing to pay, so no. Besides, I don't choose their
internet connection, nor do I have to money to pay for a better internet
connection for them. One more nasty post and your blocked.
[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 5:51pm

I don't know if you're aware of the facts of life. But, one of them is,
some people in backwards European counties need to pay _PER MEGABYTE_. Your
safe little Comcast connection doesn't require you to, but, others do.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 6:17pm

And? Why don't you tell enzo to delete these giant flame wars then? They
must total 10 times as much as my post. I apologized for my post, that
should be enough. Obviously anyone paying for an internet connection knows
that any place they go could be content rich, including chat rooms, forums,
and newsgroups.

My little post is a pittance to what they download while they're in
Activeworlds (anyone reading the ngs have a cit, so they must be in AW).
Even small worlds can use 1 GB of bandwidth a month on their OP. If they had
50 vistors during that month, and assuming that each visitor visted the
world in the exact same way for the exact same period of time, each vistor
used about 20MB of bandwidth in that one world alone! Can you really
complain about a 74k post when there are 1MB flame wars and 20MB bandwidth
usages on AW? And its one post, on one day. Its not multiple posts on
multiple days, or multiple posts in one day.
[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 6:21pm

1MB flame wars? Not bad... guess 256kb of that was napalm and the rest a
rediculously complicated Encryption scheme to stop Joe from hijacking it...

- Mark

Aug 23, 2003, 6:24pm

Maybe more like 300kb, but oh well, lol.

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 9:28pm

Non cits can read the newsgroup. Anyone can read the newsgroup... I don't
see where it says "citizens only!!!"....

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 23, 2003, 11:31pm

http://www.activeworlds.com/community/newsgroups.asp

"The newsgroups now require that you LOG ON to be able to make posts. To log
on you must use your Active Worlds Citizen Name and Password. The citizen
account must be an ACTIVE one, as expired accounts will not be recognized."

But you are right:
"Anyone can gain READ-ONLY access to the Active Worlds newsgroups without
logging on."

I dought anyone would read it unless they've been in AW though, considering
to start using AW, or soon using AW.

Aug 23, 2003, 11:34pm

I was just talking to a good friend who reads the stupidity in these
newsgroups, yet logs on as a tourists once-in-a-blue-moon. He's even on the
who pointed out that you were wrong, that tourists can -indeed- read the
newsgroups, and do.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 11:27am

But that's beside the point. They're still on AW, and they still download
far more than my little 74k post.
[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 7:32pm

But, that other stuff was worthwhile, your stilly little picture wasn't...

-Joe

[View Quote]

Aug 24, 2003, 9:03pm

True, lol
[View Quote]

1  2  |   Order by index