Thread

Wanted: 2.2 SDK (Sdk)

Wanted: 2.2 SDK // Sdk

1  2  |  

joeman

Sep 2, 2001, 7:35pm
Hi, I need the 2.2 SDK for a project I'm working on. If any one has a copy,
could they please send it to joeman at bootdown.com.


Thanks
-Joe

agent1

Sep 2, 2001, 9:08pm
I don't think that would even connect to any current Uniserver, so why would you need it?

-Agent1

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 2, 2001, 9:28pm
For a 2.2 uni server :).

-Joe

[View Quote]

agent1

Sep 2, 2001, 10:08pm
Who still has those? Isn't it mandatory to upgrade uniservers?

-Agent1

[View Quote]

xelag

Sep 2, 2001, 10:32pm
Joe, I think the current SDK works fine in 2.2 worlds. My xelagot
works in 2.2 worlds and universe without problem, just avoid using the
specifice 3.x functions, attributes and callbacks.

[View Quote] >Hi, I need the 2.2 SDK for a project I'm working on. If any one has a copy,
>could they please send it to joeman at bootdown.com.
>
>
>Thanks
>-Joe
>

joeman

Sep 2, 2001, 11:10pm
Well, when I try to query citizen immigration time, enabled, ppw, and lots
others it just returns a space. So, I dunno. Most of that stuff is handled
by the 2.2 uni server, mabey the protocol was revamped a little.

-Joe

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 2, 2001, 11:10pm
I know a few people. I dont think it was a mandatory upgrade :).

-Joe

[View Quote]

young phalpha

Sep 3, 2001, 2:57am
*cough* that 2.2 uniserver with that license check removed.. :)
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] -Agent1

[View Quote]

the derek

Sep 3, 2001, 3:41am
i have a VB copy

[View Quote]

the derek

Sep 3, 2001, 3:42am
lol no it costs 10 grand TO upgrade or at least it
did i think with the release of 3.2 all universes
can upgrade for free but none of it is mandatory

[View Quote]

agent1

Sep 3, 2001, 11:17am
"The attributes AW_CITIZEN_COMMENT, AW_CITIZEN_ENABLED, AW_CITIZEN_TOTAL_TIME, and AW_CITIZEN_URL are new in version 3.1 and require at least build 18 of the SDK and version 3.1 of the uniserver." Plus, I would assume you'd need to be running the bot as citizen one (which you likely are).

The AW_CITIZEN_PRIVILEGE_PASSWORD variable is also new from 3.1.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 1:25pm
Wow, that would be a neat trick yp :). Could you show me some time? It
would be neat to have my own one.

-Joe
[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 1:26pm
Yes, but all I can get with it is the user name, the user password and the
user email :(... Uhm...


-Joe

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 1:28pm
Great, that would work, uh, kinda as well. Could you send it to me? :)

-Joe
[View Quote]

kah

Sep 3, 2001, 3:03pm
what do you expect? the 2.2 SDK will get only that, nothing more...

KAH

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 3:23pm
It should be able to get more, or so im told.

-Joe

[View Quote]

agent1

Sep 3, 2001, 3:37pm
That's likely because that's all the Uniserver returns in 2.2. If the attributes were only allowed to be accessed by bots after then, you won't be able to do it with the 2.2 uniserver/SDK.

-Agent1

[View Quote] > Yes, but all I can get with it is the user name, the user password and the
> user email :(... Uhm...
>
>
> -Joe
>
[View Quote]

ananas

Sep 3, 2001, 3:41pm
Are you sure that the user email is an attribute in the 2.2 SDK?

[View Quote] --
"_
|
/\
\ /
__/ /_

xelag

Sep 3, 2001, 4:53pm
Joeman, stick it in your brain: build 20 (the latest 3.1 build) has
all the methods used in 2.2 universes and worlds (and more, but the
new ones don't work in older universes). What you don't get with it,
you won't get with the older versions. The only 'old' method that has
changed is that when you log in, you can't specify how many avatars
the bot will perceive: it defaults now to 50, which was the maximum in
2.2 SDK.

XelaG

[View Quote] >Great, that would work, uh, kinda as well. Could you send it to me? :)
>
>-Joe
[View Quote]

the derek

Sep 3, 2001, 4:58pm
no those variables arent in the 2.2 sdk

[View Quote]

the derek

Sep 3, 2001, 4:59pm
yeah but i thought you could only get it when
youre on the root account hmmmm

[View Quote]

the derek

Sep 3, 2001, 5:00pm
yeah but would the new sdk work in older
universes?

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 5:57pm
Listen, all I need is the 2.2, I didnt need all these comments.

-Joe

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 6:02pm
2.2 sdk too...

-Joe

[View Quote]

agent1

Sep 3, 2001, 8:44pm
Uhh... I'm sure it's illegal to use AW's software without their permission, so I don't think you should ask about it on their own news server...

-Agent1

[View Quote]

agent1

Sep 3, 2001, 8:46pm
In case you didn't read the message from Xelag, the current SDK will work.

-Agent1

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 3, 2001, 8:52pm
Good idea :).

-Joe

[View Quote]

young phalpha

Sep 4, 2001, 12:04am
well, there is one since I've been offered one, but who wants a 2.2 universe? I can't stand to
be in 2.2 for a minute...
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] [View Quote]

young phalpha

Sep 4, 2001, 12:10am
uhhh, Roland makes sure the SDK has complete and full backwards compatibility, because how would
the current 2.2 browser work in the 3.1 universe? I believe you can't login a 3.x browser into a
2.2 universe, but you can login a 3.x SDK to one...
--
Young Phalpha

[View Quote] -Joe

[View Quote]

joeman

Sep 4, 2001, 12:18am
Hmm, maybe its a problem with the php wrapped sdk. Oh well, no worries, I
gave up on it :\...

-Joe
[View Quote]

1  2  |  
Awportals.com is a privately held community resource website dedicated to Active Worlds.
Copyright (c) Mark Randall 2006 - 2024. All Rights Reserved.
Awportals.com   ·   ProLibraries Live   ·   Twitter   ·   LinkedIn