Board ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
cubic // User Search
cubic // User Searchbetter audio mixingJan 30, 1999, 7:09am
[View Quote]
What he means is that it's not meant like a homepage or so.
It's just a list that happens to be available over internet. I agree it's easier to use dates, but why won't versions do?? He is not using ver#'s to make it look like it means something, also you think he is. It's just an alternative for using the date to indicate updates. [View Quote] better audio mixingJan 30, 1999, 9:26pm
[View Quote]
So does that mean I'm not allowed to your opinion about that?
You don't want threads to evolve? BTW: Actually *why* do you think Rolu should update more frequently. On the first you seem to find the entire awfwwl kinda awfull so you shouldn't bother about the details at all. On the second even if you're online 24-7 not everyone else is. In Rolu's case: Practice learns that he has to work 4 out of 7 nights and afternoons are too expensive to go online, so has fewer opportunities and time to update it than you seem to think. (or hope) -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] better audio mixingJan 30, 1999, 9:28pm
[View Quote]
Even if so:
Does that mean you are allowed to start flaming as soon as the update-degree is lower than 1ce per week? -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] better audio mixingJan 31, 1999, 10:13am
[View Quote]
You are replying to it aswell. Sp you are also keeping the thread alive.
So don't blame other ppl. >I won't keep this up much longer with you, by the way... > > >Way to miss the point (yet again as usual). I tire of having to explain it to you over and over >again, so I won't. Enjoy your non-understanding. Thanxx. Bye-bye. (are ya gone yet..?) > >The correct phrase is "on the other hand", not "on the second". Shut up if you ain't got a better thing to complain about. Appearantly you get what I'm saying (or you wouldn;t be correcting it) so it will do. afternoons >"Practice learns"? What kind of English is that? Appearantly good enough to make you understand what I mean. Or you wouldn't be correcting it. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic >The list should be updated as soon as a new "wish" is emailed to Rolu, he reads, thinks up, or whatever. Using version #s for such an update frequency would be impractical, as would specifying the TIME of the update as some sites do. Hell, he doesn't even HAVE to even create an update page with what was added/changed/deleted/edited/etc. Just a simple "last modified on <date>" line (or a varation thereof) would suffice. > >KISS (keep it simple, stupid). Remember that. better audio mixingJan 31, 1999, 2:01pm
[View Quote]
Agh... We all die.
The advantage of helping a bit is that *you* can decide how it happens. > >Haha, like YOU do, champ? You assume TOO MUCH. I won't blindly accept your idiocy in exchange for >"pleasant" conversation with you. Try THINKING more before responding, eh? Silly kid... Thinking takes time and effort. And in the case of replying to *you*: I know I'm gonna get flamed at either way; so why bother? sarcasm? and narrowminded mindset and see > >Unfortunately, what you're witnessing is my "acquaintednance" with YOUR narrowmindedness that you're unknowingly projecting onto me, thus causing you to think it's actually MY narrowmindedness. Sad...I may just have to filter you if you persist in your lameness...I probably should've filtered you long ago, but I thought I'd give you a chance. Oh well. I know you won't filter me. Cuz if you do it will be harder to find my messages. And you *do* want to read them cuz you wanna have something to complain about. So be thankfull: I provide you with loads of stuff to complain about. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic better audio mixingJan 31, 1999, 2:01pm
[View Quote]
Agh... We all die.
The advantage of helping a bit is that *you* can decide how it happens. > >Haha, like YOU do, champ? You assume TOO MUCH. I won't blindly accept your idiocy in exchange for >"pleasant" conversation with you. Try THINKING more before responding, eh? Silly kid... Thinking takes time and effort. And in the case of replying to *you*: I know I'm gonna get flamed at either way; so why bother? sarcasm? and narrowminded mindset and see > >Unfortunately, what you're witnessing is my "acquaintednance" with YOUR narrowmindedness that you're unknowingly projecting onto me, thus causing you to think it's actually MY narrowmindedness. Sad...I may just have to filter you if you persist in your lameness...I probably should've filtered you long ago, but I thought I'd give you a chance. Oh well. I know you won't filter me. Cuz if you do it will be harder to find my messages. And you *do* want to read them cuz you wanna have something to complain about. So be thankfull: I provide you with loads of stuff to complain about. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic better audio mixingJan 31, 1999, 7:19pm
[View Quote]
Indeed. ANd it's easier for him to get the last word as long as he doesn't filter. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic > [View Quote] better audio mixingFeb 1, 1999, 4:21pm
Before I wrote this message, *you* were the one to send the last reply in
this thread. So maybe it counts for you aswell ;-) -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] audioJan 29, 1999, 5:09am
[View Quote]
No not necessaricly.
BUt there's a difference between 'mp3' and 'mp3 encoded wav'. With most encoders you can choose either one of those. I am able to play 'mp3 encoded wav's' normally with my windows-wav-playing-thing. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic >Here's an idea- try uploading an .mp3 file into AW as a .wav and see if it plays. Does it??? >Never did for me, but >I'm just a part-time programmer, and not a professional "QA" guy so I of course know absolutely >nothing about computers... Don't >bother me, twip! If you're gonna try and belittle my posts, you at least coulda come up with >something better, like "what if their web >browser isn't open?" > >grover > [View Quote] audioJan 29, 1999, 5:12am
[View Quote]
Aha.. That explains why I can play mp3-encoded-wavs just with windows...
-- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] audioJan 29, 1999, 5:41am
[View Quote]
Maybe you don't claim to pretend it.
BUt you really do give the impression... Which is *exactly* what I said in my last post; And why are you constantly contradicting yourself? In one post you state "You need extra code to play ..mp3s in AW" then turn around and say "AW can already plays mp3s because mp3s are just wavs" > >Actually, from my first response (news://news.activeworlds.com/36AE2BF2.5DA8A8F8%40tnlc.com), I said: "However, >you CAN already use MP3-encoded WAVs in AW, but people need to have the CODEC installed in order to hear them, obviously." > >And since AW can play WAVs, and all MP3s are are MP3-encoded WAVs, AW can already play them (assuming you have the MP3 CODEC--duh)! Read more carefully, champ. > > ><blink> Gee, what's a WAV, Wilbur? Ahyuk... > > >Nope, considering I don't program. Wee... > consider "simple"? > >Yep, sure do: the MP3 CODEC. :) > > >No, you just don't THINK. I know how to play MP3-enoded WAVs, which is all anyone needs to know to play them in AW. > ..mp3 files with any windows MCI program, I'll keep saying that AW doesn't support .mp3 files. > >Then you'll keeping being idiotic, as usual. Sad, grover...you have so much potential...yet so much idiocy too. What a combination...I pity you. > >If you don't have an MPEG-Layer 3 CODEC, get the latest Microsoft Media Player at http://www.microsoft.com/msdownload/iebuild/mplayer_win32/en/mplayer_win32.h tm. > > >Duh. > original message in OF COURSE I READ IT. > >Obviously not well enough. Reread it. > them. I stated that in my original reply. You're not a very good part-time programmer either, I bet. ;P shit: screen at 1280x1024. Besides, don't you remember the problems people have with *your* posts? You know, the one where people with the default settings see your posts as a single line?? > >Yep, and enabling a simple thing as wordwrapping will "fix" it. But at higher resolutions my messages still don't fragment like yours do at LOWER resolutions. Just use the maximum line length for messages and you'll be fine, sport. You can do it, superchamp! We're all rootin' fer ya! <smirk> > by a wav player. Just cos it ends in .wav doesn't mean it's a AW as a .wav and see if it plays. Does it??? Never did for me, but of course know absolutely nothing about computers... Don't least coulda come up with something better, like "what if their web already possible in AW since AW already supports WAVs. Drive through... > Re: The AW FWWL v2 is out!Jan 31, 1999, 10:14am
[View Quote]
You bet it does exist: I *can* see the page.
So appearantly the problem is not that it don't exist. [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 1, 1999, 9:06pm
[View Quote]
It would be merely sad to see how your basic calculations take 1 minute on a
Pentium, wouldn't it? Ok, then you know why to use the basic independent-from-awbrowser windows-calculator ;-) -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic CalculatorFeb 2, 1999, 6:01am
[View Quote]
The standard windows-calculator supports 32 decimals.
So you can make quite accurate calculations I think.. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 3, 1999, 4:42pm
[View Quote]
<SIGH> back: Tammy Jo was talking about just 'adding', and windows-calc will
do for that. Other operations or data types are not at all the matter here. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic >Dean-Christian Strik ("Fluxen") -- dean2 at bigfoot.com -- ICQ #11760568 >"Real programmers like vending machine popcorn. Coders pop it in the >microwave oven. Real programmers use the heat given off by the CPU. They can >tell what job is running just by listening to the rate of popping." > > [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 3, 1999, 4:50pm
[View Quote]
Cuz everything takes long in AW ;-)
BUt let's turn things around: What's wrong with the basic windows calc!? Why would they implement a calculator in awb? THe one with windows works fine. -- Cubic ICQ - 18557607 cubic at mediaport.org http://welcome.to/cubic [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 4, 1999, 8:19pm
[View Quote]
Well at least calc.exe is always on my desktop. And my handheld-calc could
be everywhere. -- Cubic > [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 4, 1999, 8:24pm
[View Quote]
No, not at all. > >It takes up screen space So? When your typing numbers in the calculator you can't do anything else at the same time anyway... > memory and cpu time when you use it. As if a built-in calc in awb wouldn't... And with a handheld-calc you have to turn away from your screen to get it. That's even less efficient. >Apart from >that, it is a very good calculator. > > >They would not because a calculator is way beyond the goal of the awb, wich >is browsing AW. Indeed. But I'm sure they'd implement it if it was very necessary or usefull. But it isn't. You already have a calculator. -- Cubic CalculatorFeb 7, 1999, 10:47am
[View Quote]
It is by default in my school-bag.
And I like to leave my school-bag further than 10 metres away from my Computer ;-) -- Cubic >Rolu > [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 7, 1999, 10:57am
[View Quote]
DOn't be offensive.
That your framerate is high doesn't mean mine is high. You never saw aw running on my pc, so keep quiet. -- Cubic >at > >but you can read from the screen, and when calc.exe is covering part of the >screen, you have to move it around etc. > > >yes, but I was comparing calc.exe to a handheld calc, blind one. > > >Not if you have it, let's say, next to your keyboard. Starting calc.exe >takes longer that way. > >wich > > CalculatorFeb 7, 1999, 7:45pm
[View Quote]
Why are you always so agressive? You look like Eep. I didn't offend you did I? If there's one thing narrowminded than it is to think that flaming is any use. Are you shouting cuz you think I'll agree earlier then?? In that case just stop it.. -- Cubic CalculatorFeb 8, 1999, 1:07pm
And mine too.
I have the same one I think. Glad my parents payed it ;-) -- Cubic [View Quote] [View Quote] [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 8, 1999, 1:07pm
Mmm....
Looks cool. How much is it?? And where can I get it? -- Cubic [View Quote] Seems like a nice thing :) [View Quote] CalculatorFeb 8, 1999, 1:11pm
[View Quote]
In 'some' cases that's a bit euphemistic.
>you always think we're like eep? Like he's the king of >offensiveness or something... Isn't he? :-) Maybe not the King. But he'll reach that stadium some day ;-) -- Cubic CalculatorFeb 13, 1999, 2:28pm
Is that a TI-83?
Or one that looks much like the 83? [View Quote] [pic] [View Quote] [pic] Rjinswand [View Quote] Rolu GravityFeb 5, 1999, 1:55pm
The way it is now, gravity is automatically disabled as soon as you press
numeric + or -. And as soon as you bring yourself back to the surface with the numeric + or - the gravity switches back on. Also if you press shift the gravity is disabled and as soon as you let go of it, it's re-enabled. *Unless* you press + or - in the mean-time, and that's what irritates me. Couldn't the gravity automatically re-enabled if you let go of shift? -- Cubic GravityFeb 5, 1999, 9:16pm
[View Quote]
Yep; between the moment you press it and the moment you let go of it.
> >I asked Roland about this process soon after strafing was implemented and he said gravity needs >to be disabled for some reason I can't recall now. Well; I'm curious... Is it some technical reason? Or is it practical? > It would be better if gravity was just left enabled while strafing, however. Indeed. >Essentially, disabling pass-thru ([Shift]) in the world >"features" does this (correct strafing happens), so it should be possible WITHOUT having to >disable pass-thru for the entire world. Mm... I'll take a look then. >Also, instead of gravity automatically disabling when >flying, there should be a gravity on/off button/key. Your right. I forgot to mention that. -- Cubic [View Quote] °ª½è¯À¬ü¤Ö¤kFeb 8, 1999, 7:46pm
|
