1  |   Order by default

Oct 23, 2002, 4:36pm

[View Quote] >..there are php-created world lists on websites with which worlds allow
>tourists..

Which few, if any tourists know about, unless they *happen* to be at
the gate when a GK that *happens* to know about it *happens* to
mention it... Slim odds indeed.

Far better to simply add it to the worlds list.

D.

Oct 24, 2002, 7:52pm

[View Quote] 'a lot' != 'all'. Why not make a simple change and make the
information available universally? Why should a tourist have to ask
for the most basic piece of information we wish them to have?

D.

Oct 25, 2002, 6:42pm

[View Quote] [top posting corrected]

>because I don't work for AW, and niether do you.. so we do what we can.. not
>complain about what we can't..

Then... why do you argue against it so hard?

Oct 22, 2002, 10:29pm

[View Quote] If you wait for things to get hopping.. They never will.

D.

Oct 23, 2002, 4:36pm

[View Quote] >..there are php-created world lists on websites with which worlds allow
>tourists..

Which few, if any tourists know about, unless they *happen* to be at
the gate when a GK that *happens* to know about it *happens* to
mention it... Slim odds indeed.

Far better to simply add it to the worlds list.

D.

Oct 23, 2002, 4:42pm

[View Quote] Any comment by a dev team member is taken as 110% gold certain buy 99%
of the userbase. *That's* why they don't respond. Their job isn't
debating in the NG's as many people seem to feel.

D.

Oct 24, 2002, 7:52pm

[View Quote] 'a lot' != 'all'. Why not make a simple change and make the
information available universally? Why should a tourist have to ask
for the most basic piece of information we wish them to have?

D.

Oct 25, 2002, 6:40pm

[View Quote] >TechnoZeus wrote ( among other stuff )
>
><It's my opinion some people like to really get involved while others just
>like to take part in, but on a smaller scale. That's the major problem with
>RPG style worlds, and with money...... >
>
>I agree that its a problem. In a few months down the track, the current
>system will divide NewAW into the "Haves" and "Havenots"......the ppl with
>cable, an AW addiction, and the "nearly room for a decent building" 5x5
>plots and the ppl that have timed internet connections, a life, and the
>slummy 3x3 prefab sized plots.

Already very visible in UO for example.

>What will that achieve for the community and would it hold the interest of
>any one but the addicts?

It will do little for 'community', and *will* generate endless tension
between the two groups.

D.

Oct 25, 2002, 6:42pm

[View Quote] [top posting corrected]

>because I don't work for AW, and niether do you.. so we do what we can.. not
>complain about what we can't..

Then... why do you argue against it so hard?

Oct 31, 2002, 5:46pm

[View Quote] (Top posting corrected for readability.)

For a beta test, you want people from a wide variety of experience
levels and backgrounds. Limiting yourself to experienced people makes
your beta nearly useless.

D.

Oct 23, 2002, 4:36pm

[View Quote] >..there are php-created world lists on websites with which worlds allow
>tourists..

Which few, if any tourists know about, unless they *happen* to be at
the gate when a GK that *happens* to know about it *happens* to
mention it... Slim odds indeed.

Far better to simply add it to the worlds list.

D.

Oct 24, 2002, 7:52pm

[View Quote] 'a lot' != 'all'. Why not make a simple change and make the
information available universally? Why should a tourist have to ask
for the most basic piece of information we wish them to have?

D.

Oct 25, 2002, 6:42pm

[View Quote] [top posting corrected]

>because I don't work for AW, and niether do you.. so we do what we can.. not
>complain about what we can't..

Then... why do you argue against it so hard?

1  |   Order by default