|
|
test thread
About Truespace Archives
These pages are a copy of the official truespace forums prior to their removal somewhere around 2011.
They are retained here for archive purposes only.
test thread // Work in Progress
Post by RicScan // Jan 28, 2006, 11:10am
|
RicScan
Total Posts: 1
|
Hello All :) |
Post by Misc // Jan 28, 2006, 12:21pm
|
Misc
Total Posts: 59
|
hi together ;) |
Post by Mitch // Jan 28, 2006, 3:09pm
|
Mitch
Total Posts: 70
|
re: test thread.
Seeing there is some concern with graphic size I am posting the following graphic as a test.
This is from KheangChrun(kcnz) posted on Caligari forum Feb. 08, 2004.
I feel it would be a shame not to have such graphics being posted here.
It was 1155 X 861 @ 803K in size. Now 800 X 596 @ 155K. Even so this is a great graphic. What are the reasons for the new limitations? |
Post by Alien // Jan 28, 2006, 3:25pm
|
Alien
Total Posts: 1231
|
I agree, it is a great image. & at the new size, I have no problem with it. The reason I was asking for restrictions to be imposed is sometimes people post images that are so big that it means that anyone who doesn't have their screen set to the same resolution as the person who posted the image has to either scroll back & forth for every line of each post on that page, or else block that individual image once they've seen it.
With this new forum layout the maximum width I'd like to see would be 925. Having said that, on that test forum that some of us found, someone posted a pic that went off the side of the screen, but only that post was stretched, the one underneath was normal sized. I don't know if it's possible to do that for attached pics as well [in this instance it was a direct linked image], but if it is that would certainly be better than the current situation where 1 person posts a big image & anyone with a lower screen res has to keep scrolling back & forth for every line on that page. |
Post by Délé // Jan 28, 2006, 3:37pm
|
Délé
Total Posts: 1374
|
I think that 800 for width is probably pretty good. That way the people that have 1024 X 768 resolution with their browsers sidebar open should still be able to see all of the text without trouble. I would personally like it if the height restriction was bumped up quite a bit though. :) |
Post by Alien // Jan 28, 2006, 3:43pm
|
Alien
Total Posts: 1231
|
Sounds good to me - I would have said 800 as well, but I thought I might get less disagreement from those who would post larger images if I upped the figure a bit as a compromise. |
Post by dctrbnsttr // Jan 28, 2006, 4:54pm
|
dctrbnsttr
Total Posts: 2
|
here's my test to see if i make it on the list.....:D |
Post by Mitch // Jan 28, 2006, 5:44pm
|
Mitch
Total Posts: 70
|
Alien you are asking for a 800 pixel limit.
That is the current limit for posting pictures on this forum.
Try an experiment and include a graphic.
You will be prompted for the graphic and it list the limits.
Which for graphics is 800 X 600.
It would seem that the vast majority of graphics would fit into
this size. So this size should not cause any problems for most. |
Post by Alien // Jan 28, 2006, 6:49pm
|
Alien
Total Posts: 1231
|
Hmmm. I haven't tried uploading a pic yet, besides my avatar that is. I had noticed a couple of pics that were more than just a little bigger than 800 wide, but I guess they must have been posted before Norm added that size limit rule. |
Post by ADL7 // Jan 29, 2006, 9:29am
|
ADL7
Total Posts: 16
|
Hello Everybody!
The forums look great! :) |
Post by Alien // Jan 30, 2006, 12:55pm
|
Alien
Total Posts: 1231
|
Alien you are asking for a 800 pixel limit.
That is the current limit for posting pictures on this forum.
Try an experiment and include a graphic.
You will be prompted for the graphic and it list the limits.
Which for graphics is 800 X 600.
It would seem that the vast majority of graphics would fit into
this size. So this size should not cause any problems for most.It would seem the limit only applies to attachments, not linked images. At least the automatic limit, anyway. |
Post by Alien // Jan 31, 2006, 8:56am
|
Alien
Total Posts: 1231
|
I think that would work Norm, but only if the ftp server being linked allowed anonymous access. |
Post by Gavelsnodd // Aug 5, 2006, 10:25am
|
Gavelsnodd
Total Posts: 18
|
test
http://forums1.caligari.com/truespace/attachment.php?attachmentid=2040&stc=1&d=1154809367 |
Post by kujisha // Jan 15, 2007, 9:01pm
|
kujisha
Total Posts: 50
|
Here is just a test text
Check Check Check |
|
