1  |   Order by index

Jul 7, 2000, 11:24am

<39648950$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com> <39650624$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: 63.23.195.230
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.23.195.230
Date: 7 Jul 2000 09:13:57 -0400
X-Trace: 7 Jul 2000 09:13:57 -0400, 63.23.195.230
Lines: 45
X-Authenticated-User: eep
X-RCPT-TO: <moderator at activeworlds.com>
X-UIDL: 1122
Status: U

[View Quote] > Ahh, but I never said I was against wasting bandwidth either, so I ain't
> no hypocrite. (how's that spell-checker, btw? ;P) In fact, I'm willing
> to waste enough bandwidth to choke a Mac if it'll get my point across.
> :) I was just trying to see things from Bits' point of view and attempt
> to help clarify his point.

Um, the point YOU are proving of Bits' is "contribut[ing] to overloaded threads [which wastes] bandwidth because of the domino effect it causes".

> Oh, and I can beat a dead horse as long as anyone, so we can take this
> outside if you want. ;) I mean, heck, it's not like I have anything
> better to do. Why else would I be posting in this newsgroup? ;D
>
> Ok, that's enough for me; I'll wait for a discussion with a bit more
> ammo in it. But I'll let ya have the last word if you really want to.
> See ya next thread! ;)

If only you were around when--gee, I can't even remember the twit's name anymore it's been so long--some old-time AWer challenged me to a flame match. We kept it up for weeks and he eventually broke down crying or something.

[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index