ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: Let the Bandwidth-wasting Begin! (was Re: Doesn't matter eep. :)) (Community)
Re: Let the Bandwidth-wasting Begin! (was Re: Doesn't matter eep. :)) // Community=?iso-8859-1?q?eep=b2?=Jul 7, 2000, 11:24am
<39648950$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com> <39650624$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Path: 63.23.195.230 NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.23.195.230 Date: 7 Jul 2000 09:13:57 -0400 X-Trace: 7 Jul 2000 09:13:57 -0400, 63.23.195.230 Lines: 45 X-Authenticated-User: eep X-RCPT-TO: <moderator at activeworlds.com> X-UIDL: 1122 Status: U [View Quote] > Ahh, but I never said I was against wasting bandwidth either, so I ain't > no hypocrite. (how's that spell-checker, btw? ;P) In fact, I'm willing > to waste enough bandwidth to choke a Mac if it'll get my point across. > :) I was just trying to see things from Bits' point of view and attempt > to help clarify his point. Um, the point YOU are proving of Bits' is "contribut[ing] to overloaded threads [which wastes] bandwidth because of the domino effect it causes". > Oh, and I can beat a dead horse as long as anyone, so we can take this > outside if you want. ;) I mean, heck, it's not like I have anything > better to do. Why else would I be posting in this newsgroup? ;D > > Ok, that's enough for me; I'll wait for a discussion with a bit more > ammo in it. But I'll let ya have the last word if you really want to. > See ya next thread! ;) If only you were around when--gee, I can't even remember the twit's name anymore it's been so long--some old-time AWer challenged me to a flame match. We kept it up for weeks and he eventually broke down crying or something. [View Quote] |