1  |   Order by index

Jul 6, 2000, 11:27am

<396261dc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com> <396388a4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Path: 63.23.195.53
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.23.195.53
Date: 6 Jul 2000 04:46:16 -0400
X-Trace: 6 Jul 2000 04:46:16 -0400, 63.23.195.53
Lines: 31
X-Authenticated-User: eep
X-RCPT-TO: <moderator at activeworlds.com>
X-UIDL: 1120
Status: U

Apparently you're proving his point, too (as is he since he admits to wanting to waste bandwidth). In essence, you're both hippocrits, while I never claimed to not want to reduce bandwidth by simply responding to a post. Not my fault if it causes a multitude of twits to respond to my response, wasting bandwidth!

But don't get me started on wasting bandwidth; I'll wipe the Internet with your sorry bits...;)

[View Quote] > Apparently, you neglected to read the second half of his post. Here's a
> refresher:
>
>
> And since you replied to it, you basically proved his point for him. You
> don't *have* to reply to every single inane post. Best to let stupid
> threads die...
>
> Now to switch gears a tad.
>
> To whomever is moderating these here newsgroups: Learn how to thread!
> Every time I look a a thread, I see this huge list of posts that all
> look like they're replying to the same post, when in fact they're
> replying to each other. It's annoying, and it's hard to tell who's
> replying to who! Get with the program!

1  |   Order by index