1  |   Order by index

Jul 2, 2000, 11:27pm

<395e5293 at server1.Activeworlds.com> <395e9c8d$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Path: 63.23.195.202
NNTP-Posting-Host: 63.23.195.202
Date: 2 Jul 2000 08:56:59 -0400
X-Trace: 2 Jul 2000 08:56:59 -0400, 63.23.195.202
Lines: 58
X-Authenticated-User: eep
X-RCPT-TO: <moderator at activeworlds.com>
X-UIDL: 1110
Status: U

http://tnlc.com/eep/wrap.html to learn a few things about line/word wrapping, Bit. You also might want to learn how to change the message subject. Back to Net Basics 101 with ya, 'tard! <flick>

[View Quote] > You also have to realize, it's not the person replying to the
> message that has a lot of control over how the original text looks all
> the time. It's the original sender of the message that has control on
> how the message is being broken up. I have set mine to 77 character
> width, which is a standard on most all email and news reader display
> characteristics. As you can see, the quoted text below is exactly how I
> receive it with the exception of the reply line header character I have
> chosen to use. So please get off this kick about how people should post
> and just accept the fact that not everyone cares about it the way you
> do. :) Besides, I'd rather see each line with a character header
> anyhow, because the way YOU reply.. How would I know what was quoted
> and what is being replied to? Oh wait, duh me, the attacking text is
> yours.. LOL
>
> PS: Your nagging seems to contribute to overloaded threads and wasted
> band width because of the domino effect that it causes.. Therefore, you
> are guilty of useless blah in the news groups (such as this message) and
> hereby granted the "Redundant Award" of the year. ;) If you consider
> this a flame toward Eep, you are wrong, this was posted out of total
> boredom and I just wanted to waste bandwidth, HD space and your time..
> :) Oh, and replying to this would be pointless, because it's pretty
> much a repeat of a repeat of yet many more repeats of wasted replied to
> posts that do nothing more than post for the hell of it.
>
> "Eep²" wrote
> (snipped header info)
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index