1  |   Order by index

Mar 13, 2003, 12:40am

The logic in this is a bit unclear to me. I do not support terror tho.
What comes to point #4, I guess you mean you suspect Iraq support terror ?

The basks in northern Spain is also know to use terror, so IRA in
North-Irland. Should we also bomb those areas and all organisations and
countries supporting them ? With your logic one could probably say that
France support the basks and the catholic church IRA,, so maybe bomb France
and the Vatican State also?

Drac
sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6fb0fc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chris: "Iraq was never a threat until after September 11, which happened
SIX
> MONTHS after Bush took office"
> If this do not mean you are blaming Iraque for what happened Septemper
11th,
> then I do not know what would.
>
> Let me clarify then.
>
> 1. The War on Terrorism started after September 11.
> 2. The War on Terrorism's purpose is NOT to target ONLY the people
> responsible for September 11.
> 3. Al Qaeda is responsible for September 11.
> 4. Iraq supports terror. It is a target.
>
> Conclusion: Iraq has nothing to do with September 11. But it has
something
> to do with terrorism. Terrorism and Sept 11 are not the same thing.
>
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index