1  |   Order by index

Mar 11, 2003, 10:53pm

I have never said Iraque do not have weapons, I belive ALL countries have,
maybe not the Vatican State tho.
I have only said I have not seen any proof Iraue would have some so called
illegal weapons, and even if they had, I still do not think it is up to one
country to attack them , but it is a matter of UN to FIRST try to get to a
peacefull solution, and if that do not work, then do what might be needed.

I really do not see how it would give away anything if someone showed Blix
on a map where the weapons are. USA do not have to give away the entire
operation how they found out, just simple show Blix on a map where to look.
It do not even have to come out in public; just present the info within the
security council.

Drac
bowen <thisguyrules at 7k2.4mg.com.ANTISPAM> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6e5ece at server1.Activeworlds.com...
but
whar
>
> The difference is your information doesn't rely on people being in
dangerous
> situations to gather intel. You may or may not know if they have evidence
or not;
> but if you say something like that where there's some proof you don't,
then it's
> horrible. Go ahead and prove Iraq doesn't have weapons, then I'll believe
you.
>
> Just because you can't see them doesn't mean they're not there. I suppose
if you
> face a wall in a dark room with your eyes close the wall doesn't exist
either.
>
> --Bowen--
>
>

1  |   Order by index