1  |   Order by index

Mar 11, 2003, 5:19am

Chris: "Iraq was never a threat until after September 11, which happened SIX
MONTHS after Bush took office"
If this do not mean you are blaming Iraque for what happened Septemper 11th,
then I do not know what would.

I want you to wait until UN says it is ok, if you do not wait YOU (USA) is
breaking the international laws. Not sure what is so hard to understand in
that ?
Funny thing is also that USA is planning to use chemical weapons in the
attack; the same weapons that are supposed to be a reason for an attack.
Contravercial I would say.
USA has asked several European countries (Finland ) including to kick out
some iraqi diplomats, the reason they said was that they are spys; funny
comming from a country which reads other peoples e-mails and listen to
phones of the memebers of UN ( security council).

You say peace at any price is nuts; maybe so, but war at any price is worse
in my opinion.

What I would like to hear ? I would like to hear the truth from Bush, not
mumble jumlbe about going in to resque the iraqi ppl.
All reasons I have heard so far has sounded like cover ups. Blix has not
found anything that would be a reason for a war.
USA claims Iraque has illegal weapons, how come nobody finds them? Cannot
USA simply show on a map where to look then? One would not belive that would
give away any strategies.
Somehow it seems to me, that if USA has some proofs and refuse to give them,
is simply because they would get busted also, a bit like a burgler beeing
witness to a murder. If he goes to the police he will get busted also.

Drac



sw chris <chrisw10 at skywalkeronline.net> kirjoitti
viestissä:3e6d669c$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> -----------------
> And if this was is about a revange ( as you actually said) , how come USA
> did not attack directly after the attack, why wait this long, and if one
has
> waited this long, what is the harm of waiting a bit longer ?
> -----------------
>
> How long do you want us to wait?
>
> No no no! Count! You disappoint me! >_< You refute against my so
called
> "claim" that this war is about revenge. If Bush has waited this long,
then
> it's not about revenge. That's your unfinished though. And then you say
in
> the next paragraph that it is about revenge?
>
> Honest? More like telling you what you want to hear.
>
> Chris
>
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index