Re: Prestons aren't computer friendly (Bots)
Re: Prestons aren't computer friendly // Bots
Jul 17, 2000, 12:32pm
Litestep does seem to be a much more stable shell than Explorer. However, I
would only reccommend using a different shell if you are an advanced
computer user and know exactly what you are doing. If you are an advanced
user, you might want to give it a try. Good thing is, you can always just
switch back to the regular Windows shell.
-Agent1
[View Quote]"nova" <n at n.com> wrote in message news:3972fa43 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well i know of a way to get more system resorces free.
> well 2 ways both require use of a difrent shell the second frees up more
ram
> at a cost of control over some programs.
> 1 IMO the best is litestep replacement shell it will change one line in
your
> system ini shell=c:\windows\explorer.exe to shell=c:\litestep.exe
> url for that one is
> http://www.litestep.net
> the secound is the old 3.1 program manager
> changes shell to
> shell=c:\windows\progman.exe i could not get at icq to send people
messages
> etc
> both save you alot of resorces ls will bump you up to 96% at start up from
63
> 64%
> with ls donot use daily builds ls looks like linux. i have no idea what ls
> does to regis to work with nt and 2000 as i dont use them and never looked
but
> is in their faqs sectiion. ls is free and progman is already on your os if
any
> one decides to dl ls read the faqs first
|
Jul 17, 2000, 10:33pm
your right is reason i said to read the FAQS as it is a way difrent shell and
take some getting use to also any one who does try it feel free to tgram me.
and ill help as much as i can. if you try it give it 3 days bef you dump it
once your use to it you will never go back to explorer :)
p.s. ehehe sence agent seems to have some knolage tgram him for help to :)
[View Quote]"agent1" <anbugera at home.com> wrote:
>Litestep does seem to be a much more stable shell than Explorer. However, I
>would only reccommend using a different shell if you are an advanced
>computer user and know exactly what you are doing. If you are an advanced
>user, you might want to give it a try. Good thing is, you can always just
>switch back to the regular Windows shell.
>
>-Agent1
>
>"nova" <n at n.com> wrote in message news:3972fa43 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>ram
>your
>messages
>63
>but
>any
|
|