ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: trolling moron (was Re: word usage) (General Discussion)
Re: trolling moron (was Re: word usage) // General DiscussionkitAug 13, 2002, 10:12pm
[View Quote]
[View Quote]
Hello :o)
Perhaps I was unclear. Trolls and Troll-Baiters my dear Agent1, are simply variations of the same ilk. I have no issue with trolls or being a troll/troll baiter. I do appreciate a well thought out troll-post. I'm sure you meant no offense nor was any offense taken :o) I do however have issues with humourless and ill-equipped pedants and unimaginative name-callers. These people illustrate clearly their inability to support a position. There are a few here who could be great assets to the AW Community, to Activeworlds Administration, who are a wealth of information about RWX, Renderware, object creation, UV and texture mapping and yes, even grammar ad-nauseum ,who destroy their own credibility by belittling tactics such as name-calling, who avoid the real questions by participating in inane pedantry, who for lack of critical thinking skills are unable to convey any semblance of reliability. (please see short examples from this thread at the bottom of this post) (examples from other threads available on request) I wanted to thank all of you who privately wrote e-mail and sent telegrams of support and good cheer about this matter. I've been extremely busy but will get back to every one of you. Again, thanks so much. Eep, we know given your circumstances that you might not have known any better behaviour but the important thing is to learn from your mistakes :o) I do hope you'll stick around as Im sure the other readers will forget this whole sorry business in a couple of years. Cheers, Kit (the ultimate troll) Er, no, those are spelling differences, not intensity differences. "Worst" is more extreme than "worse"; and there is no "worser" or "worsest". Um, Bowen, stop being lame. Get over it and learn how to use words correctly--which is what this thread is about. Oh puhleaze...now you're being REALLY lame--properly lame, even. You're talking about Analglish, not English. Informal English isn't so lame, but you had better know the difference between "worse" and "worst". How funny you expect other people to accept your mistakes when you in your hypocracy don't accept others. Drive through, hypocrite-boy!When have I been wrong? Good god you're a geek. Get over it already. Hardly; you better go look up the word "efficient", sport. You're getting desperate for arguments. Back to Grammar 101 with you. Credit is EARNED, not given mindlessly away. Take a basic English grammar and get a clue (anyone spot the issues with this phrase?) Nope, my grammar is fine; you simply don't understand it. (this one just takes the cake!!) Look, twit, why even bother responding in the first place if you're just going to be a snotty snob about it? Get over yourself already and lose the attitude, twit. (pft!...attitude?...chortles) Don't bother as you're now filtered. Enjoy being ignored, twit! He hardly "burnt" me, Syntax; he's just being a trolling moron and I tire of him. Hopefully the idiot'll go into a troll feedback loop: troll-baiting himself, the troll. (dang, I thought he filtered me!) |