1  |   Order by index

Oct 3, 2001, 11:35pm

I rarely respond in newsgroups but feel compelled to after hearing Chris's
eloquent words and than being viewed as a trouble maker. Chris speaks the truth
and at the same time is being objective. It is difficult for me to stand by and
see Justin dance around the issue and not give any answers, but than I know the
answers. He allows the assumption that the answers are what he would like them
to be, without outwardly lieing. The people who are loud and act kinda crazy at
times are safer than the ones that sit back and act very normal. What is that
saying? The devil you know is better than the devil you dont know? If anyone
has any questions, catch me in NewYork privately and I can answer them for you.


FriendPA




[View Quote] > I dare to jeopardize my own status in this newsgroup be even replying to
> this. That was going to be my last post on this, and I tried to make that
> evident. Who's dragging this up now?
>
> As I said before, I'm on the fence, and I'm not ruling out the possibility
> that Just In could be a wolf in sheep's clothing. You shouldn't blindly
> base yourself on "Just In's side" simply because JFK2 and Chuck's Party were
> on "the other side". I mean, really? How dumb a move is that? Use your
> head and sort out the evidence (evidence is not proof) before discounting
> everything because two overly eager jug-heads went on a smear campaign. I
> don't mean that as an insult, I mean it as advice.
>
> Do you even know who first leveled those allegations at Just In? It wasn't
> JFK or Chucky, I'll tell you that. If you want to know, ask them to chime
> in, because they're reading these newsgroups and they know who they are.
>
> I really can't stress enough to you that absolutely 0% of my position on
> this issue is based on JFK and Chucky's hearsay.
>
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index