ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Re: Just In (was Re: bike.rwx avatar) (General Discussion)
Re: Just In (was Re: bike.rwx avatar) // General Discussiongoober kingOct 2, 2001, 12:18pm
Well, I don't. I've had to put up with this bullshit for, what's it
been, 6 months now? And every time someone decides to dredge it up, all it causes is more bickering and finger-pointing. It's not that we don't want to act, it's just that we see no reason to act. If there was overwhelming evidence that Just In was indeed, and still is, an acting pedophile, then maybe we would care. But the fact of the matter is that it's all circumstantial evidence at this point. And you sitting there trying to figure out what Just In's real name is is not going to change anything. So please, if it's really that much of a concern to you, talk to the Australian authorities, or even just give AWC a call, (I'm sure they have Just In's name on record) and leave us out of it! [View Quote] > You should care. > > .... > > *blinks* > > Ok. fine. You win. I was trying to be as non-invasive and non-threatening > as possible. It seems that this body is not capable of acting. I can see I > or my principles are not wanted here. Good day. > -- > SW Chris > Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master? > http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html > [View Quote] -- Goober King Definitely should follow your own advice... rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu |