1  |   Order by index

Dec 3, 2003, 6:02pm

Crossposted reply from SDK group

--

Gee.. shouldn't you post this kind of detailed info in the beta group
where the people working on the code are?

[View Quote] Oh.. you're *not* a member of the beta? I'm shocked.

=8O

You should ask for access.. I'm sure they will grant you access.

Why ENZO himself personally asked me if I would like to be on it,
and I've never even released anything to the community.

ENZO? Can Alex have that spot in the beta you offered me?

Pretty please?

>
> Dear AW development team,

<SNIP *extremely detailed feedback that would cost thousands
of dollars to get from professional testers*>

Obviously you would be a great asset for any company to test their
stuff. That assumes of course that they are interested in finding bugs,
and fixing them too. You've led them right to the exact problem, and
provided enough information that surely they can squash this bug
completely without the costly process of actually reproducing it and
capturing the kind of intformation you have there.

Hopefully the oversight with your name not getting pulled out of the
'beta' hat will be corrected. Hopefully you and the half dozen or so
other people who make things everyone relies on in here every day
have the appropriate access to the AWI developers.

This issue will be a good chance for all of us to see how AWI deals
with outside developers and content producers who provide all of the
added value, which is an issue of particular interest to me.

I would also be interested in knowing how they deal with people
trying to make commercial ventures based around AW technology.
As you clearly point out, this issue is a bit of a roadblock. I would
expect to see quick action to resolve this.

Please.. keep us all informed how this situation plays out.

1  |   Order by index