1  |   Order by index

Jun 24, 2004, 9:41am

In the Robinson case it was the MOTHERS of the children who took their
children to the murderer.
Therefore I demmand. Bann all mothers from internet! (using the
linnean-logic)

Drac
"xelag" <xelag at digitalspace.com> kirjoitti viestiss
news:s0ghd091md5ui6kdl1afglhnjprq5v10nc at 4ax.com...
> Sharon,
>
> I don't need your respect. You give what you have. You and Linn have
> already proved to me that what you give is what you have: a lack of
> respect. You can claim what you want, sure, but there are enough
> people who DO have enough sense to judge. As for me, I have said what
> I think is right to say.
>
> The answer to my question, which approach was used in this case, is it
> scenario A or scenario B:
>
> Scenario B all the time.
>
> And for me personally, the case is closed. Even if I strongly
> disaprove of X's actions, I disaprove even more of your witchhunting
> practices. You have closed the doors for a real discussion on the
> participation of kids to virtual reality, which I think is needed.
>
> Who is responsible for the kids? Why did these kids get the idea that
> they could trust VR people implicitely, where were their parentals?
> What sort of damage was inflicted on them? How many kids were
> involved, and what for age groups? If counseling was done, where was
> the accent: oh you were cheated / you might have learned a lesson? And
> what the heck was a kid doing involving itself in a virtual marriage?
> What was your role in all this, are you looking how the kid, if
> damaged, can learn to relate, or are you projecting your own fears on
> the kid? Many more questions... but useless in the context you
> created.
>
> By your packing this in a criminal surrounding, which you even admit
> is not feasible, you have lost credibility, and made any fruitfull
> discussion impossible. A damn shame.
>
> Alex
>
> On 22 Jun 2004 15:46:11 -0400, ".sharon" <sharonclarke at prexar.com>
[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index