|
|
To Whom It May Concern... [long!] (Community)
To Whom It May Concern... [long!] // Community
Jul 20, 2001, 2:44pm
yup, true, Moria... AWCOM listens a lot more than and gives a lot more than
most people ever realize...
I think that what the people really want is for Rick and JP to step into the
AW limelight once in a while and accept the kudos or the rotten tomatos;
whatever "the users" want to throw at them at the moment...
I suggest Rick and JP take turns hosting the Monday night AWTrivia games at
11pm and be seen!!! We just want to "reach out and touch" now and then...
:o)
Come out and take it like the rest of us, Rick and JP!!! Come take the good
and the bad... LOL
[View Quote] <moria at colony.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3b584adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> interesting:)
>
> lets see as a flying starter...
>
> teleports, seperate worlds, higher cell limits, new avs, sdk, lighting,
> move commands, new building worlds, worlds for specific purposes granted
> free, new objects built by citizens, gatekeepers, peacekeepers, hardware
> rendering, firewall support, skyboxes, universes, new object sets free,
> evolving browser, z object usage...
>
> that list took 10 seconds ALL of which were trigered by community
requests
> over the years, 2 of which are about to be introduced in the next
release.
>
> enough yet, or just none that are on your personal wish list?
>
> Moria
>
>
> goober king <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B583A7A.184E5C4B at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> every single
> SOME of our
> the ideas
> through Facter's
> around and
one,
> would be
|
Jul 20, 2001, 5:05pm
[View Quote]"moria" <moria at colony.co.uk> wrote in message news:3b584adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> interesting:)
>
> lets see as a flying starter...
>
> teleports,
|
Old invention.
>seperate worlds,
Old
>higher cell limits,
Need higher ones now that they've given us commands that use it laglessly
>new avs,
Old, unless my cached avatars.dat file is outdated, I've been using the same av list since 1998 at least
>sdk,
Relatively old
>lighting,
Got one thing we wanted, but it has glitches (NEED NEGATIVE LIGHTING!)
> move commands,
VERY bad implementation
>new building worlds,
When did we ask for this?
>new objects built by citizens,
Note that WE had to do the work to get this basic stuff, and we're going to have to do it again.
>gatekeepers, peacekeepers,
Gatekeepers are still n00berizing(TM) quite well, but the PKs have problems.
>hardware
> rendering,
This is mostly due to advances in Renderware and probable dropping of support for the old RW version, so AWC HAD to move on or lose
support for their API
>firewall support,
Ahhh, but the question is, will it WORK?
>skyboxes,
It's yet to be seen if these are worth it.
> universes,
Huh? The corperate suits use these for the most part, too f'n expensive.
>new object sets free,
and how many worlds use an AWCI object set other than Alpha's?
> evolving browser,
After Renderware gave it a kick in the backside.
> z object usage...
Technically, we don't have that, just X objects. They're nice though.
Point? They've slacked off in the past few years, and the kickstarting of development was done by Criterion, not by us.
Jul 20, 2001, 7:42pm
that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
so that is where they will pay their attention.
[View Quote]"swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message news:3b583476 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
: difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of users,microsofts
: OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
: dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
: including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
: billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple of
: thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw is a
: small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
: become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
: what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new OS
: they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get from
: feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
: problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
: better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based on
: user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
:
: "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
: news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
: requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
: > imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for that
: matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
: > are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their ideals..
: and that because they used to be involved, they can still
: > be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past years.
: You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
: > should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you could
: be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
: > large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every customer, I
: doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
: > large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is far
: beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
: > like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not understand
: how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
: > company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have more
: time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
: > amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up either.
: What makes this software company so different then others
: > that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
: other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
: > them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
: citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
: > companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a terms of
: service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
: > change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
: customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
: > You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and are
: outraged? give me a break!
: >
: > "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
: news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
: > : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or what
: plans I have
: > : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't *listening*
: to our ideas
: > : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something as
: simple as
: > : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us and
: go about their
: > : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
: hoping to open
: > : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the general
: public *does*
: > : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will know
: that their
: > : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
: make all the
: > : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make a
: lick of
: > : difference.
: > :
: > : icey wrote:
: > : >
: > : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are you
: going to conceive to
: > : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming, design,
: applications, are
: > : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach to
: the 3D or are you
: > : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
: environments, you want AW
: > : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what in
: particular would
: > : > you like to do...I don't understand...
: > : > icey
: > : > goober king wrote:
: > : >
: > : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for bashing
: and name-calling
: > : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing to
: work together with
: > : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
: who've signed this
: > : > > letter. Are you?
: > : > >
: > : > > icey wrote:
: > : > > >
: > : > > > What do you offer?
: > : > > >
: > : > > > goober king wrote:
: > : > > >
: > : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
: > : > > > >
: > : > >
: > : > > <snip>
: > :
: > : --
: > : Goober King
: > : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
: > : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
: >
: >
:
:
|
Jul 20, 2001, 7:43pm
how do you know? because they're responding doesn't mean they're not listening..
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message news:3B583A7A.184E5C4B at acsu.buffalo.edu...
: We're not asking them to drop everything they are doing and implement every single
: little idea that we come up with. All we're asking is that they consider SOME of our
: ideas and concerns. They haven't even bothered to truly consider ANY of the ideas
: that ANY of us have brought to them, either through the Wishlist NG, through Facter's
: suggestion box, or through email directly. If they were to suddenly turn around and
: even implement ONE idea that the community wanted to see, then I, for one, would be
: happy and you'd never hear from me again. Is that so hard to grasp?!
:
: And as for "magnitude", check my post above.
:
: j b e l l wrote:
: >
: > there was also a time when they had a low amount of customers, a low amount of requests, and a lot of free time.. people like
you
: > who complain about their lack of community involvement have no sympothy from me.. fullfilling all your requests would slow the
: > company down, and would not allow them to have enough time for all the work they currently have in progress. People who
complain
: > about this type of thing usually don't understand business or how to run one succesfully. They also do not realize the size and
: > magnitued of AWC as a company.
: >
:
: --
: Goober King
: Just because they're called "Corp" doesn't mean their a big one.
: rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jul 20, 2001, 10:05pm
we dont want them to spend time with us! we want them to listen to our
ideas,and do the good ones!
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more
being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
> should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have
to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
> so that is where they will pay their attention.
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b583476 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
> : difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of
users,microsofts
> : OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
> : dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
> : including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
> : billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple
of
> : thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw
is a
> : small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
> : become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
> : what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new
OS
> : they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get
from
> : feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
> : problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
> : better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based
on
> : user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
> :
> : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> : news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : > the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
> : requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
> : > imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for
that
> : matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
> : > are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their
ideals..
> : and that because they used to be involved, they can still
> : > be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past
years.
> : You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
> : > should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you
could
> : be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
> : > large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every
customer, I
> : doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
> : > large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is
far
> : beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
> : > like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not
understand
> : how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
> : > company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have
more
> : time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
> : > amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up
either.
> : What makes this software company so different then others
> : > that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
> : other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
> : > them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
> : citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
> : > companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a
terms of
> : service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
> : > change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
> : customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
> : > You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and
are
> : outraged? give me a break!
> : >
> : > "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> : news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> : > : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or
what
> : plans I have
> : > : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't
*listening*
> : to our ideas
> : > : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something
as
> : simple as
> : > : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us
and
> : go about their
> : > : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
> : hoping to open
> : > : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the
general
> : public *does*
> : > : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will
know
> : that their
> : > : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
> : make all the
> : > : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make
a
> : lick of
> : > : difference.
> : > :
> : > : icey wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are
you
> : going to conceive to
> : > : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming,
design,
> : applications, are
> : > : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach
to
> : the 3D or are you
> : > : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
> : environments, you want AW
> : > : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what
in
> : particular would
> : > : > you like to do...I don't understand...
> : > : > icey
> : > : > goober king wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for
bashing
> : and name-calling
> : > : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing
to
> : work together with
> : > : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
> : who've signed this
> : > : > > letter. Are you?
> : > : > >
> : > : > > icey wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > What do you offer?
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > goober king wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
> : > : > > > >
> : > : > >
> : > : > > <snip>
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : Goober King
> : > : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
> : > : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 10:07pm
oh and another thing is that aol and microsoft anf other suchcompanys have
physcologists whos understand the way people think,and expers who read
feedbacks and do what ever is the best idea
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more
being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
> should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have
to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
> so that is where they will pay their attention.
>
> "swe" <m_swehli at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b583476 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : ur comparing aw,with AOL or Microsoft or Napster??? cant u see the tiny
> : difrence between them and aw?i mean napster has millions of
users,microsofts
> : OSs are used by almost every computer in the world and made billions of
> : dollars. AOL is probelly the biggest internet compant in the world,not
> : including the fact that warner brothers is now part of aol and also made
> : billions of dollars. and ur compairing it with aw who only have a couple
of
> : thousand users, and hardly made anything compared to those companys! aw
is a
> : small company and thats why they should listen to people if they wanna
> : become a big one! instead of just doing what they "THINK" people want,or
> : what only they want. Oh and for ur infomation,when Microsoft make a new
OS
> : they make the things they think there OS needs, and the stuff they get
from
> : feed backs from there users!and aol is a isp,how could u possibly have
> : problems with that??? and there is nothing that they can do to make aol
> : better,but they still do! napster already made a whole new browser,based
on
> : user feedbacks,nothing but user feedback
> :
> : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message
> : news:3b57bee5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : > the fact is that AWCI is too large a company to listen to individual
> : requests.. you don't expect microsoft to listen to your every
> : > imput.. nor do you expect symantec, aol, napster, the govornment for
that
> : matter.. what makes this any different? The fact that you
> : > are self rightous and believe your oppinion should dominate their
ideals..
> : and that because they used to be involved, they can still
> : > be.. Things change, the company has grown exponentially in the past
years.
> : You need to understand that they are evolving, and you
> : > should be too. The day when the company was small enough that you
could
> : be personal with it's owners is over. It is simply too
> : > large and too time consuming for AWC to be intimate with every
customer, I
> : doubt they even have the time to be especially close with
> : > large corporate customers either. The size and magnitude of AWC is
far
> : beyond what first meets the eye. Because the software seems
> : > like a close-knit type of program, they expect it, they do not
understand
> : how much work is involved to run such a fast growing
> : > company. I'll admit that it could be more efficient, and could have
more
> : time for the community, but it isn't, and the growing
> : > amount of extreme requests by citizens doesn't help speed it up
either.
> : What makes this software company so different then others
> : > that you feel they should pay attention to you. You feel neglected by
> : other companies and are taking it out on AWC. What makes
> : > them any different? What makes it that they MUST give the thousands of
> : citizens their complete devotion, while other, even smaller
> : > companies, don't have to, and it goes unqeustioned. My ISP has a
terms of
> : service, on the bottom of it they state that they can
> : > change their TOS at any time without notice or reason. Millions of
> : customers acknowledge this, and yet continue to use the service.
> : > You are net getting full attention of the owner of the company, and
are
> : outraged? give me a break!
> : >
> : > "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> : news:3B55FF27.D9307D39 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> : > : That's just it, icey. It doesn't matter what I want AW to be, or
what
> : plans I have
> : > : for AW. What this is all about is the fact that AWCI isn't
*listening*
> : to our ideas
> : > : or suggestions, regardless of what they are. Even if it's something
as
> : simple as
> : > : restoring the old low-res textures, they will completely ignore us
and
> : go about their
> : > : own ways. *That* is what I'm trying to change with this letter. I'm
> : hoping to open
> : > : the channels of communication so that in the future, when the
general
> : public *does*
> : > : have something they'd like to see changed or implemented, they will
know
> : that their
> : > : ideas are at least being considered. But until that happens, you can
> : make all the
> : > : petitions you want and piss and moan all you want, and it won't make
a
> : lick of
> : > : difference.
> : > :
> : > : icey wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > Yes, but what are your objectives, what are your goals, what are
you
> : going to conceive to
> : > : > improve AW, are you going to implement programs, programming,
design,
> : applications, are
> : > : > you going to find a new way to build or maybe a different approach
to
> : the 3D or are you
> : > : > just concerned in already built areas and collaborative virtual
> : environments, you want AW
> : > : > to be a toy, the internet game, a fun chat, a free software...what
in
> : particular would
> : > : > you like to do...I don't understand...
> : > : > icey
> : > : > goober king wrote:
> : > : >
> : > : > > An olive branch, for all intents and purposes. The time for
bashing
> : and name-calling
> : > : > > is over. Now is a time of communication and action. I'm willing
to
> : work together with
> : > : > > these people to help make AW a better place, as are the people
> : who've signed this
> : > : > > letter. Are you?
> : > : > >
> : > : > > icey wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > What do you offer?
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > goober king wrote:
> : > : > > >
> : > : > > > > To Whom It May Concern...
> : > : > > > >
> : > : > >
> : > : > > <snip>
> : > :
> : > : --
> : > : Goober King
> : > : Solve the main problem, and all other solutions will follow...
> : > : rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
> : >
> : >
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jul 20, 2001, 11:19pm
HUNDREDS MY ASS! There are FIFTEEN universes and galaxies (If I remember the nubmer correctly, theres a list somewhere on these
groups) and maybe 10 companies that AWC is dealign with through ads, worlds, etc. on an active basis.
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
> should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have to have larger customers, that is where they make profit,
> so that is where they will pay their attention.
|
Jul 21, 2001, 6:18pm
last i checked (a cpl years ago) there were over 40.. i somehow believe your mis-corrected... not to mention different browsers such
as the juno one and sun weekly, and also the new product they will be releasing with in a year or so....
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message news:3b58d89b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: HUNDREDS MY ASS! There are FIFTEEN universes and galaxies (If I remember the nubmer correctly, theres a list somewhere on these
: groups) and maybe 10 companies that AWC is dealign with through ads, worlds, etc. on an active basis.
: "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
: > AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more being consulted daily, and you seem to think that they
: > should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have to have larger customers, that is where they make
profit,
: > so that is where they will pay their attention.
:
:
:
|
Jul 21, 2001, 10:40pm
Yes, I appear to be incorrect about the number of universes, but whats this about sun? Did I miss somthing? New product? UGH.
[View Quote]"j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b59e3ad$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> last i checked (a cpl years ago) there were over 40.. i somehow believe your mis-corrected... not to mention different browsers
such
> as the juno one and sun weekly, and also the new product they will be releasing with in a year or so....
> "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message news:3b58d89b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : HUNDREDS MY ASS! There are FIFTEEN universes and galaxies (If I remember the nubmer correctly, theres a list somewhere on these
> : groups) and maybe 10 companies that AWC is dealign with through ads, worlds, etc. on an active basis.
> : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : > that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
> : > AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more being consulted daily, and you seem to think that
they
> : > should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have to have larger customers, that is where they make
> profit,
> : > so that is where they will pay their attention.
> :
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jul 22, 2001, 6:32am
some mall..
[View Quote]"wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message news:3b5a20f5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: Yes, I appear to be incorrect about the number of universes, but whats this about sun? Did I miss somthing? New product? UGH.
: "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b59e3ad$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > last i checked (a cpl years ago) there were over 40.. i somehow believe your mis-corrected... not to mention different browsers
: such
: > as the juno one and sun weekly, and also the new product they will be releasing with in a year or so....
: > "wing" <bathgate at prodigy.net> wrote in message news:3b58d89b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > : HUNDREDS MY ASS! There are FIFTEEN universes and galaxies (If I remember the nubmer correctly, theres a list somewhere on
these
: > : groups) and maybe 10 companies that AWC is dealign with through ads, worlds, etc. on an active basis.
: > : "j b e l l" <jbell1983 at home.com> wrote in message news:3b58a5c9$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > : > that isn't the point.. it is a company just like all others..
: > : > AWCom has 100s of uniserver customers and corporate customers, with more being consulted daily, and you seem to think that
: they
: > : > should spend every waking hour with us. They can't afford to, they have to have larger customers, that is where they make
: > profit,
: > : > so that is where they will pay their attention.
: > :
: > :
: > :
: >
: >
:
:
|
Aug 2, 2001, 7:28am
Don't forget :
Multiple Select,Multiple Copy,Multiple Delete,Multiple Move , Finer Object
Moving,Whisper, Select All (in a Cell),
Chat Logging,They Didn't Nuke GZ,Privacy Options,Flying(I think),Larger
Alpha World,andafewotherthaticantrememberthislateatnightthankyou
[View Quote]moria <moria at colony.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3b584adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> interesting:)
>
> lets see as a flying starter...
>
> teleports, seperate worlds, higher cell limits, new avs, sdk, lighting,
> move commands, new building worlds, worlds for specific purposes granted
> free, new objects built by citizens, gatekeepers, peacekeepers, hardware
> rendering, firewall support, skyboxes, universes, new object sets free,
> evolving browser, z object usage...
>
> that list took 10 seconds ALL of which were trigered by community
requests
> over the years, 2 of which are about to be introduced in the next
release.
>
> enough yet, or just none that are on your personal wish list?
>
> Moria
>
>
> goober king <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B583A7A.184E5C4B at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> every single
> SOME of our
> the ideas
> through Facter's
> around and
one,
> would be
>
>
>
|
Aug 2, 2001, 7:31am
[View Quote]daphne <Daphne_is at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b585fec at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> yup, true, Moria... AWCOM listens a lot more than and gives a lot more
than
> most people ever realize...
>
> I think that what the people really want is for Rick and JP to step into
the
> AW limelight once in a while and accept the kudos or the rotten tomatos;
> whatever "the users" want to throw at them at the moment...
>
> I suggest Rick and JP take turns hosting the Monday night AWTrivia games
at
> 11pm and be seen!!! We just want to "reach out and touch" now and then...
> :o)
>
> Come out and take it like the rest of us, Rick and JP!!! Come take the
good
> and the bad... LOL
>
> <moria at colony.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3b584adb at server1.Activeworlds.com...
Once upon a time , they did . Certain sectors , decided to act like
terrorists and make sure they had little pleasure in mingling, and they've
been scarce ever since
|
|
