|
|
Pornographic Material In Active Worlds (email #3) (Community)
Pornographic Material In Active Worlds (email #3) // Community
Jun 5, 2001, 8:20pm
Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
Jun 5, 2001, 9:45pm
m a r c u s,
I understand your concern, but on the same token, I really think you
are reaching beyond reality here. You obviously did not read or
understand the disclaimer that Facter posted here. It simply states
that they (AWcom) are not liable for anything you might see or read that
you cannot tolerate. You as a user have agreed to this when you decided
to use the software, you are responsible for yourself and so is every
user that uses the medium. I also saw that there was nothing in that
disclaimer stating that they would respond to your email or that they
would act on your content.
Basically, if you don't like it, report it. You have done that. If
they decide they don't like it either, then so be it.
Quote in part:
"You hereby release AWCOM from any and all liability for all
claims related to Content as well as claims related to the security or
level
of privacy provided."
If this sounds like I am saying to you, "IMO, your just blowing a
lot of air to get attention and using this subject as a means to get
it.", I am. ;) As I said before, be responsible for yourself and allow
the rest of us to be responsible for ourselves.
Pssst: If AWcom willingly displays porn to you via the company, go get
em Tiger! ;)
I addressed this to you m a r c u s but I also wanted to share my
insight on this with the rest of the group. Some may agree, some may not
care and others are probably getting tired of this topic. I apologize
about the IMO line above if I am false with that thought. I still hold
strong to the rest of the content of this post.
Sincerely
Bits
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d5b14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
:
: First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
:
:
|
Jun 5, 2001, 9:52pm
i would like to know how you "reported" it, Marcus
Did you actually get off your high horse long enough to admit you now know
the correct procedure ( after everyone, painstakingly, and in words of one
syllable, explained it to you ) and consent to actually FOLLOW it?
By the way, there are links to the same information in AWSchool and any
teacher or teachers aide could have passed on said information.
[View Quote]> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d5b14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> :
> : First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 10:48pm
I am testing the waters now, I was told to email, and so far 3 emails have
been sent.
We'll see. All I had to do with the server holding the porn was email once
and it was removed.
A lot of work here just to remove 2 pictures, but we'll see.
Will they respond or won't they?
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d70b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> i would like to know how you "reported" it, Marcus
>
> Did you actually get off your high horse long enough to admit you now
know
> the correct procedure ( after everyone, painstakingly, and in words of one
> syllable, explained it to you ) and consent to actually FOLLOW it?
>
> By the way, there are links to the same information in AWSchool and any
> teacher or teachers aide could have passed on said information.
>
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 11:39pm
I'm wondering, why are you on this anti-porn crusade? Sure it's an issue,
but there are many other issues to crusade on. Porn is hardly a issue in
aw. You're making it seem like there is some sort of out of control porn
epidemic, children can't walk past GZ without seeing some sort of brutal
rape scene, vast tracts of building space taken up by giant exposed tits.
Are you just bored and need some great crusade to embark on? Does this
crusade help you feel moraly superior to others? There is little or no porn
problems in aw, and even at its worst not enough to warrent such a
passionate responce from you.
Also, we all know about your crusade, what you believe in, and what you
want done about it. You've made that VERY clear. Now WHY do you continue
to argue and post on the NG for all to read? You've informed the community,
and now please leave us out of your crusade and deal with it in private. If
you keep on going on like you are, you're going to make me want to spread
porn through out AW.
Am I the only one here that's heard enough of this? It's moved past the
issue, and is now nothing than marcus trying to prove how moral he is and
how big his soap box is. I'm begining to think he cares less about the
"issue" and simply wants to shoot his mouth out and look like the
porn-savior of aw.
The porn issue has been delt with as far as it can on the NG's, PLEASE MOVE
ON.
Jun 5, 2001, 11:43pm
1 email to the server holding the porn so they can remove it is hardly a
crusade.
[View Quote]"moff piett" <piett at home.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d89bc$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm wondering, why are you on this anti-porn crusade? Sure it's an
issue,
> but there are many other issues to crusade on. Porn is hardly a issue in
> aw. You're making it seem like there is some sort of out of control porn
> epidemic, children can't walk past GZ without seeing some sort of brutal
> rape scene, vast tracts of building space taken up by giant exposed tits.
> Are you just bored and need some great crusade to embark on? Does this
> crusade help you feel moraly superior to others? There is little or no
porn
> problems in aw, and even at its worst not enough to warrent such a
> passionate responce from you.
>
> Also, we all know about your crusade, what you believe in, and what you
> want done about it. You've made that VERY clear. Now WHY do you continue
> to argue and post on the NG for all to read? You've informed the
community,
> and now please leave us out of your crusade and deal with it in private.
If
> you keep on going on like you are, you're going to make me want to spread
> porn through out AW.
>
> Am I the only one here that's heard enough of this? It's moved past the
> issue, and is now nothing than marcus trying to prove how moral he is and
> how big his soap box is. I'm begining to think he cares less about the
> "issue" and simply wants to shoot his mouth out and look like the
> porn-savior of aw.
>
> The porn issue has been delt with as far as it can on the NG's, PLEASE
MOVE
> ON.
>
>
|
Jun 5, 2001, 11:58pm
When I had trash removed by the GET they telegrammed me once they had done
it.
How come after so many people told you the correct procedure was to FILL IN
THE FORM ON THE GET WEB PAGE do you send an email to who-knows-who?
BTW - who did you send the email too? And to whom did you send the previous
two emails? And what dates did you send the earlier emails? I'm sure
Fletch or Tom would be glad to investigate what happened to these emails.
Regards, Justin
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d7dcb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I am testing the waters now, I was told to email, and so far 3 emails have
> been sent.
>
> We'll see. All I had to do with the server holding the porn was email
once
> and it was removed.
>
> A lot of work here just to remove 2 pictures, but we'll see.
>
> Will they respond or won't they?
>
> "kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d70b5 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> know
one
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:02am
Fletch claims to read email from at least one of these sources
abuse at activeworlds.com and support at activeworlds.com.
Unless you read form mail, you won't see me doing the reporting.
[View Quote]"just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When I had trash removed by the GET they telegrammed me once they had done
> it.
>
> How come after so many people told you the correct procedure was to FILL
IN
> THE FORM ON THE GET WEB PAGE do you send an email to who-knows-who?
>
> BTW - who did you send the email too? And to whom did you send the
previous
> two emails? And what dates did you send the earlier emails? I'm sure
> Fletch or Tom would be glad to investigate what happened to these emails.
>
> Regards, Justin
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d7dcb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
> once
> one
any
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:22am
Just as i thought. Its an issue calculated to get attention as some one has
previously stated. Just like the little boy that ran around with his eyes
closed , yelling " I cant find it and its all some one elses fault!"
Several ppl have repeatedly given you the link and the url and the facts,
and regardless of whether you had the sense to go look in the right places
previously, you now KNOW where to go and you have as yet to email the
correct place or submit your request to the right ppl, but you continue
whipping the dead horse of your outraged, misplaced self rightousness.
*sigh*
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d8f3b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Fletch claims to read email from at least one of these sources
> abuse at activeworlds.com and support at activeworlds.com.
>
> Unless you read form mail, you won't see me doing the reporting.
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:26am
If it were my fault, why did the server holding the porn remove it?
[View Quote]"kellee" <kellee at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d9400 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Just as i thought. Its an issue calculated to get attention as some one
has
> previously stated. Just like the little boy that ran around with his eyes
> closed , yelling " I cant find it and its all some one elses fault!"
>
> Several ppl have repeatedly given you the link and the url and the facts,
> and regardless of whether you had the sense to go look in the right places
> previously, you now KNOW where to go and you have as yet to email the
> correct place or submit your request to the right ppl, but you continue
> whipping the dead horse of your outraged, misplaced self rightousness.
>
>
> *sigh*
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d8f3b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:27am
See, that's the thing. I think I've figured out what Marcus is trying to do here.
He's not concerned about porn at all. The only thing he seems to care about is
proving that AWLD will not do what he thinks they should be doing. He seems to think
that AWCom should be the ones cleaning up trash in AW. The only problem is he fails
to realize that it's not AWCom's responsibility to clean up porn. Granted, if they
were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do something about it. But the
act of removing said porn is NOT in their job description. That's what GET is for.
And even though he's been bombarded with messages telling him how to do things the
correct way, he refuses to take the advice and simply repeats what he's said all
along: "It's AW's fault, not mine!"
As I mentioned in a previous post, I'd swear Chuck was training him. The parallels
between this mess and the whole SAW fiasco are just disturbing...
[View Quote]moff piett wrote:
>
> I'm wondering, why are you on this anti-porn crusade? Sure it's an issue,
> but there are many other issues to crusade on. Porn is hardly a issue in
> aw. You're making it seem like there is some sort of out of control porn
> epidemic, children can't walk past GZ without seeing some sort of brutal
> rape scene, vast tracts of building space taken up by giant exposed tits.
> Are you just bored and need some great crusade to embark on? Does this
> crusade help you feel moraly superior to others? There is little or no porn
> problems in aw, and even at its worst not enough to warrent such a
> passionate responce from you.
>
> Also, we all know about your crusade, what you believe in, and what you
> want done about it. You've made that VERY clear. Now WHY do you continue
> to argue and post on the NG for all to read? You've informed the community,
> and now please leave us out of your crusade and deal with it in private. If
> you keep on going on like you are, you're going to make me want to spread
> porn through out AW.
>
> Am I the only one here that's heard enough of this? It's moved past the
> issue, and is now nothing than marcus trying to prove how moral he is and
> how big his soap box is. I'm begining to think he cares less about the
> "issue" and simply wants to shoot his mouth out and look like the
> porn-savior of aw.
>
> The porn issue has been delt with as far as it can on the NG's, PLEASE MOVE
> ON.
|
--
Goober King
Lord knows we need *another* one of those things...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Jun 6, 2001, 12:30am
"Granted, if they were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do
something about it."
Wanting to do something is wonderful, I want to rid aids, cancer, diabetes,
etc.. all the bad things. However, removing porn is something we can do.
Let's ALL work together on this instead of trying to shoot the peron who is
trying to help remove it.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D95A2.A5259199 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> See, that's the thing. I think I've figured out what Marcus is trying to
do here.
> He's not concerned about porn at all. The only thing he seems to care
about is
> proving that AWLD will not do what he thinks they should be doing. He
seems to think
> that AWCom should be the ones cleaning up trash in AW. The only problem is
he fails
> to realize that it's not AWCom's responsibility to clean up porn. Granted,
if they
> were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do something about
it. But the
> act of removing said porn is NOT in their job description. That's what GET
is for.
> And even though he's been bombarded with messages telling him how to do
things the
> correct way, he refuses to take the advice and simply repeats what he's
said all
> along: "It's AW's fault, not mine!"
>
> As I mentioned in a previous post, I'd swear Chuck was training him. The
parallels
> between this mess and the whole SAW fiasco are just disturbing...
>
> moff piett wrote:
issue,
in
porn
brutal
tits.
porn
you
continue
community,
If
spread
and
MOVE
>
> --
> Goober King
> Lord knows we need *another* one of those things...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:40am
Tolerate... now _there's_ an overused term... and misdefined by most
people, I think...
SW Chris
[View Quote]"bitmaster" <bitmeister at i2k.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d6f01 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> m a r c u s,
>
> I understand your concern, but on the same token, I really think you
> are reaching beyond reality here. You obviously did not read or
> understand the disclaimer that Facter posted here. It simply states
> that they (AWcom) are not liable for anything you might see or read that
> you cannot tolerate. You as a user have agreed to this when you decided
> to use the software, you are responsible for yourself and so is every
> user that uses the medium. I also saw that there was nothing in that
> disclaimer stating that they would respond to your email or that they
> would act on your content.
>
> Basically, if you don't like it, report it. You have done that. If
> they decide they don't like it either, then so be it.
>
> Quote in part:
> "You hereby release AWCOM from any and all liability for all
> claims related to Content as well as claims related to the security or
> level
> of privacy provided."
>
> If this sounds like I am saying to you, "IMO, your just blowing a
> lot of air to get attention and using this subject as a means to get
> it.", I am. ;) As I said before, be responsible for yourself and allow
> the rest of us to be responsible for ourselves.
>
> Pssst: If AWcom willingly displays porn to you via the company, go get
> em Tiger! ;)
>
> I addressed this to you m a r c u s but I also wanted to share my
> insight on this with the rest of the group. Some may agree, some may not
> care and others are probably getting tired of this topic. I apologize
> about the IMO line above if I am false with that thought. I still hold
> strong to the rest of the content of this post.
>
> Sincerely
> Bits
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d5b14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> :
> : First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:44am
SAW was a fiasco? More like a puff of smoke...
SW Chris
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3B1D95A2.A5259199 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> See, that's the thing. I think I've figured out what Marcus is trying to
do here.
> He's not concerned about porn at all. The only thing he seems to care
about is
> proving that AWLD will not do what he thinks they should be doing. He
seems to think
> that AWCom should be the ones cleaning up trash in AW. The only problem is
he fails
> to realize that it's not AWCom's responsibility to clean up porn. Granted,
if they
> were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do something about
it. But the
> act of removing said porn is NOT in their job description. That's what GET
is for.
> And even though he's been bombarded with messages telling him how to do
things the
> correct way, he refuses to take the advice and simply repeats what he's
said all
> along: "It's AW's fault, not mine!"
>
> As I mentioned in a previous post, I'd swear Chuck was training him. The
parallels
> between this mess and the whole SAW fiasco are just disturbing...
>
> moff piett wrote:
issue,
in
porn
brutal
tits.
porn
you
continue
community,
If
spread
and
MOVE
>
> --
> Goober King
> Lord knows we need *another* one of those things...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:44am
He's only trying to shoot you because you haven't tried any other ways to
get rid of it. Sending e-mails to AWCom is not the only way. :)
SW Chris
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d95c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> "Granted, if they were told of porn being spotted in AW, they'd want to do
> something about it."
>
> Wanting to do something is wonderful, I want to rid aids, cancer,
diabetes,
> etc.. all the bad things. However, removing porn is something we can do.
> Let's ALL work together on this instead of trying to shoot the peron who
is
> trying to help remove it.
>
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B1D95A2.A5259199 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> do here.
> about is
> seems to think
is
> he fails
Granted,
> if they
> it. But the
GET
> is for.
> things the
> said all
> parallels
> issue,
> in
> porn
> brutal
> tits.
this
no
> porn
> you
> continue
> community,
private.
> If
> spread
the
> and
the
PLEASE
> MOVE
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 12:49am
LOL, yea, that's it. I never tried other means. Listen idiot, I emailed
the server that held the porn and they had it removed fairly instantly in
May.
I spent the month of April reporting it to Active Worlds before I went to
the server. Why? I didn't want the account closed that held the porn. I
just wanted those 2 pics to be removed. However, the server that held the
porn did close the account, not just remove the porn. So, there you have
it. I went out of Inactiveworld's system, and I got the job done.
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d991f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> He's only trying to shoot you because you haven't tried any other ways to
> get rid of it. Sending e-mails to AWCom is not the only way. :)
>
> SW Chris
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d95c7$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
do
> diabetes,
do.
> is
to
problem
> is
> Granted,
about
|
> GET
do
he's
The
issue
> this
> no
what
> private.
> the
is
> the
> PLEASE
>
>
Jun 6, 2001, 1:12am
Chris isn't an idiot..... :-\
[View Quote]m a r c u s <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d9a56 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL, yea, that's it. I never tried other means. Listen idiot, I emailed
> the server that held the porn and they had it removed fairly instantly in
> May.
>
> I spent the month of April reporting it to Active Worlds before I went to
> the server. Why? I didn't want the account closed that held the porn. I
> just wanted those 2 pics to be removed. However, the server that held the
> porn did close the account, not just remove the porn. So, there you have
> it. I went out of Inactiveworld's system, and I got the job done.
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d991f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:16am
Not til now, LOL. He just snuck into this without reading the posts.
Probably too busy working on SW City, great place.
[View Quote]"syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
news:3b1d9fb8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Chris isn't an idiot..... :-\
>
> m a r c u s <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d9a56 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
emailed
in
to
I
the
have
> to
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:17am
Thanks, we work hard on it. :-)
--
Syntax
syntax at swcity.net
www.swcity.net
[View Quote]m a r c u s <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1da092 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not til now, LOL. He just snuck into this without reading the posts.
> Probably too busy working on SW City, great place.
>
> "syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1d9fb8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> emailed
> in
> to
> I
> the
> have
ways
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:18am
Sorry but i have to disagree with you based on this.......
Please refrain from using Active Worlds for the following activities:
1. Displaying material containing nudity, pornography, or sexual material of
a lewd, lecherous or obscene nature and intent or that violate local, state
and national laws.
2. Providing material that is grossly offensive to the online community,
including blatant expressions of bigotry, prejudice, racism, hatred or
excessive profanity;
3. Promoting or providing instructional information about illegal
activities, promoting physical harm or injury against any group or
individual, or promoting any act of cruelty to animals; This includes, but
is not limited to, the following activities: Providing instructions on how
to assemble bombs, grenades and other weapons;
4. Covering excessive amounts of land in any of the AW.com public building
worlds, including AlphaWorld, Mars, Atlantis, Yellow, or COFMeta, by any
means including bots, keyboard macros, or even manual building. Please limit
land claiming to land which you can directly use to build on yourself.
"Excessive" land claiming is defined as any area greater than 1 square
kilometer, or 100 cells by 100 cells.
We reserve the right to suspend or remove any world, objects or properties
from the Active Worlds universe which is brought to our attention and which
we find, in our sole discretion, violates any of these content guidelines or
otherwise is in violation of the law.
AWCI does not actively monitor the content of the worlds in Active Worlds,
but we will investigate complaints of violation of these guidelines.
This is what we signed up for and it quite clearly states that AWCI will
investigate and remove any such things. I don't see anything there about
GET. This goes for all other posts on this thread refering to the same
thing.
[View Quote]"bitmaster" <bitmeister at i2k.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d6f01 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> m a r c u s,
>
> I understand your concern, but on the same token, I really think you
> are reaching beyond reality here. You obviously did not read or
> understand the disclaimer that Facter posted here. It simply states
> that they (AWcom) are not liable for anything you might see or read that
> you cannot tolerate. You as a user have agreed to this when you decided
> to use the software, you are responsible for yourself and so is every
> user that uses the medium. I also saw that there was nothing in that
> disclaimer stating that they would respond to your email or that they
> would act on your content.
>
> Basically, if you don't like it, report it. You have done that. If
> they decide they don't like it either, then so be it.
>
> Quote in part:
> "You hereby release AWCOM from any and all liability for all
> claims related to Content as well as claims related to the security or
> level
> of privacy provided."
>
> If this sounds like I am saying to you, "IMO, your just blowing a
> lot of air to get attention and using this subject as a means to get
> it.", I am. ;) As I said before, be responsible for yourself and allow
> the rest of us to be responsible for ourselves.
>
> Pssst: If AWcom willingly displays porn to you via the company, go get
> em Tiger! ;)
>
> I addressed this to you m a r c u s but I also wanted to share my
> insight on this with the rest of the group. Some may agree, some may not
> care and others are probably getting tired of this topic. I apologize
> about the IMO line above if I am false with that thought. I still hold
> strong to the rest of the content of this post.
>
> Sincerely
> Bits
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d5b14$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> : Sent on - Date: 6/5/01 6:17:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time
> :
> : First 2 attempts provided no response from Inactiveworlds.
> :
> :
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:25am
SAW is still alive and well but won't be given out in this NG again to a
bunch of immature idiots who are going to make a long thread to flame and
attack me with, it's there for those that need it now, concerned Citizens as
it were. :)
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d9908 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> SAW was a fiasco? More like a puff of smoke...
>
> SW Chris
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3B1D95A2.A5259199 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> do here.
> about is
> seems to think
is
> he fails
Granted,
> if they
> it. But the
GET
> is for.
> things the
> said all
> parallels
> issue,
> in
> porn
> brutal
> tits.
this
no
> porn
> you
> continue
> community,
private.
> If
> spread
the
> and
the
PLEASE
> MOVE
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:32am
I'm sorry, I did read every post, but yours are so long that I must have
missed something. Anyways, if you've already taken care of the problem,
what in the hell are you doing still e-mailing AWcom and bothering this NG
for? huh!? >:(
SW Chris
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1da092 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Not til now, LOL. He just snuck into this without reading the posts.
> Probably too busy working on SW City, great place.
>
> "syntax" <syntax at swcity.net> wrote in message
> news:3b1d9fb8 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> emailed
> in
> to
> I
> the
> have
ways
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 1:35am
Why are people responding?
[View Quote]"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
news:3b1da433 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> I'm sorry, I did read every post, but yours are so long that I must have
> missed something. Anyways, if you've already taken care of the problem,
> what in the hell are you doing still e-mailing AWcom and bothering this NG
> for? huh!? >:(
>
> SW Chris
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1da092 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
instantly
went
porn.
held
> ways
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 3:12am
Well... I can also vouch for Chucks Party there...
I've seen SAW & it is 100% still there
and right now [last time i looked that is] it contained a few names...
2 of those names and their respective CIT #'s sometimes post here &
the other one i don't think has ever posted in the ngs yet.
chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in
<3b1da2a9 at server1.Activeworlds.com>:
>SAW is still alive and well but won't be given out in this NG again to a
>bunch of immature idiots who are going to make a long thread to flame
>and attack me with, it's there for those that need it now, concerned
>Citizens as it were. :)
>
>
[View Quote]>"sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
>news:3b1d9908 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
|
Jun 6, 2001, 3:37am
I agree, I went there just now and I noticed SAW is looking really good as
well as the improvements MSN has done.
[View Quote]"jfk2" <jfk2 at jfkmusic.com> wrote in message
news:90B8B387jfk2jfkmusiccom at news.activeworlds.com...
> Well... I can also vouch for Chucks Party there...
> I've seen SAW & it is 100% still there
> and right now [last time i looked that is] it contained a few names...
> 2 of those names and their respective CIT #'s sometimes post here &
> the other one i don't think has ever posted in the ngs yet.
>
> chucks party <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in
> <3b1da2a9 at server1.Activeworlds.com>:
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 3:44am
AWCom remove porn? I'd rather see them do something more productive. If I
don't wanna see porn I teleport elsewhere, problem solved (least for me, I
covered my land ^_^ ). I can avoid porn but I can't avoid something like
buggy software.
--
SW Comit
swcomit at swcity.net
Mayor of SW City
http://www.swcity.net
President of Community Linkage Commission
http://comlinkage.tripod.com
[View Quote]"m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d9a56 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL, yea, that's it. I never tried other means. Listen idiot, I emailed
> the server that held the porn and they had it removed fairly instantly in
> May.
>
> I spent the month of April reporting it to Active Worlds before I went to
> the server. Why? I didn't want the account closed that held the porn. I
> just wanted those 2 pics to be removed. However, the server that held the
> porn did close the account, not just remove the porn. So, there you have
> it. I went out of Inactiveworld's system, and I got the job done.
>
>
> "sw chris" <chrisw10 at nckcn.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d991f at server1.Activeworlds.com...
to
to
> do
> do.
who
trying
> to
care
He
> problem
> about
what
>
> do
> he's
> The
an
> issue
control
exposed
or
> what
past
> is
about
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 3:46am
LOL at rule 4. Probably every town that's lasted more than a couple months
has broken that rule =P
--
SW Comit
swcomit at swcity.net
Mayor of SW City
http://www.swcity.net
President of Community Linkage Commission
http://comlinkage.tripod.com
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1da11c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry but i have to disagree with you based on this.......
>
> Please refrain from using Active Worlds for the following activities:
>
> 1. Displaying material containing nudity, pornography, or sexual material
of
> a lewd, lecherous or obscene nature and intent or that violate local,
state
> and national laws.
>
> 2. Providing material that is grossly offensive to the online community,
> including blatant expressions of bigotry, prejudice, racism, hatred or
> excessive profanity;
>
> 3. Promoting or providing instructional information about illegal
> activities, promoting physical harm or injury against any group or
> individual, or promoting any act of cruelty to animals; This includes, but
> is not limited to, the following activities: Providing instructions on how
> to assemble bombs, grenades and other weapons;
>
> 4. Covering excessive amounts of land in any of the AW.com public building
> worlds, including AlphaWorld, Mars, Atlantis, Yellow, or COFMeta, by any
> means including bots, keyboard macros, or even manual building. Please
limit
> land claiming to land which you can directly use to build on yourself.
> "Excessive" land claiming is defined as any area greater than 1 square
> kilometer, or 100 cells by 100 cells.
>
> We reserve the right to suspend or remove any world, objects or properties
> from the Active Worlds universe which is brought to our attention and
which
> we find, in our sole discretion, violates any of these content guidelines
or
> otherwise is in violation of the law.
>
> AWCI does not actively monitor the content of the worlds in Active Worlds,
> but we will investigate complaints of violation of these guidelines.
>
> This is what we signed up for and it quite clearly states that AWCI will
> investigate and remove any such things. I don't see anything there about
> GET. This goes for all other posts on this thread refering to the same
> thing.
>
>
>
> "bitmaster" <bitmeister at i2k.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d6f01 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:13am
hummm and by who s standards do we judge all this "smut"?mmm?
[View Quote]"just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3b1d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When I had trash removed by the GET they telegrammed me once they had done
> it.
>
> How come after so many people told you the correct procedure was to FILL
IN
> THE FORM ON THE GET WEB PAGE do you send an email to who-knows-who?
>
> BTW - who did you send the email too? And to whom did you send the
previous
> two emails? And what dates did you send the earlier emails? I'm sure
> Fletch or Tom would be glad to investigate what happened to these emails.
>
> Regards, Justin
>
>
> "m a r c u s" <justdontemail at here.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d7dcb$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
have
> once
> one
any
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:16am
ahhh ty chuck this reminds me of someone i DONT know here LOL
[View Quote]"chucks party" <Chucks_Party at hotmail.com> wrote in message
2. Providing material that is grossly offensive to the online community,
including blatant expressions of bigotry, prejudice, racism, hatred or
excessive profanity;<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<yep its HIM
news:3b1da11c at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Sorry but i have to disagree with you based on this.......
>
> Please refrain from using Active Worlds for the following activities:
>
> 1. Displaying material containing nudity, pornography, or sexual material
of
> a lewd, lecherous or obscene nature and intent or that violate local,
state
> and national laws.
>
> 2. Providing material that is grossly offensive to the online community,
> including blatant expressions of bigotry, prejudice, racism, hatred or
> excessive profanity;
>
> 3. Promoting or providing instructional information about illegal
> activities, promoting physical harm or injury against any group or
> individual, or promoting any act of cruelty to animals; This includes, but
> is not limited to, the following activities: Providing instructions on how
> to assemble bombs, grenades and other weapons;
>
> 4. Covering excessive amounts of land in any of the AW.com public building
> worlds, including AlphaWorld, Mars, Atlantis, Yellow, or COFMeta, by any
> means including bots, keyboard macros, or even manual building. Please
limit
> land claiming to land which you can directly use to build on yourself.
> "Excessive" land claiming is defined as any area greater than 1 square
> kilometer, or 100 cells by 100 cells.
>
> We reserve the right to suspend or remove any world, objects or properties
> from the Active Worlds universe which is brought to our attention and
which
> we find, in our sole discretion, violates any of these content guidelines
or
> otherwise is in violation of the law.
>
> AWCI does not actively monitor the content of the worlds in Active Worlds,
> but we will investigate complaints of violation of these guidelines.
>
> This is what we signed up for and it quite clearly states that AWCI will
> investigate and remove any such things. I don't see anything there about
> GET. This goes for all other posts on this thread refering to the same
> thing.
>
>
>
> "bitmaster" <bitmeister at i2k.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d6f01 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Jun 6, 2001, 7:48am
Either the person has clothes on or they don't, that is not a hard one to
spot. They even made a term for it "birthday suit", when you don't have any
clothes on.
[View Quote]"linn" <ironhead at digitalpassage.com> wrote in message
news:3b1df435 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> hummm and by who s standards do we judge all this "smut"?mmm?
> "just in" <Justefyde at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3b1d8e5e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
done
> IN
> previous
emails.
> have
now
of
> any
>
>
|
|
