ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Maybe (Bots)
Maybe // Botstwisted horizonNov 13, 2000, 7:20pm
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_00C9_01C04D8A.1A76E900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Maybe this message doesn't fit in this group, but look what I found in = an OLD OLD message by Eep. Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a programming, language, Dth. Besides, I = sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just to make silly AW bots... = Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically and having to = express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic programming = "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I won't be programming = any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home some = programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em. Look at all these errors, and out of Eep? A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a scripting language. It is not = RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more programming than some = things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't = object-oriented. This is top down programming either way. C)Is there something wrong with learning to make "silly" AW bots? I did. D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this supposed to meen? = Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this, = continue. E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile enough for you? Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-) 1)can't, not can's 2)"programming, language," 3)hope, not home And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple programming languages, = yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet. -Twisted Horizon ------=_NextPart_000_00C9_01C04D8A.1A76E900 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Maybe this message doesn't fit in = this group,=20 but look what I found in an OLD OLD message by Eep.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a = programming,=20 language, Dth. Besides, I sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just = to make=20 silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically = and=20 having to express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic=20 programming "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I = won't be=20 programming any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home = some=20 programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em.<BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Look at all these errors, and out of = Eep?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a = scripting=20 language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more = programming=20 than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't=20 object-oriented. This is top down programming either way.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>C)Is there something wrong with learning to make=20 "silly" AW bots? I did.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this = supposed to=20 meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this,=20 continue.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile = enough for=20 you?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>1)can't, not can's</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>2)"programming, language,"</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>3)hope, not home</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple = programming=20 languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>-Twisted Horizon</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_00C9_01C04D8A.1A76E900-- grimbleNov 13, 2000, 8:33pm
The question has to be asked ...
If its and OLD OLD message........ why post a response? You just looking to get a rise out of Eep or what? 'cuz there's really no need for it is there? [View Quote] Maybe this message doesn't fit in this group, but look what I found in an OLD OLD message by Eep. agent1Nov 13, 2000, 8:43pm
Javascript is a scripting language... Doesn't get compiled into anything.
-Agent1 [View Quote] Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a programming, language, Dth. Besides, I sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just to make silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically and having to express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic programming "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I won't be programming any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home some programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em. Look at all these errors, and out of Eep? A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a scripting language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more programming than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't object-oriented. This is top down programming either way. C)Is there something wrong with learning to make "silly" AW bots? I did. D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this supposed to meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this, continue. E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile enough for you? Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-) 1)can't, not can's 2)"programming, language," 3)hope, not home And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple programming languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet. > tony56Nov 13, 2000, 9:07pm
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C04D90.B00DD5E0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why dwell on something that's old? And, JavaSCRIPT is a scripting = language. Never heard of a JavaSCRIPT compiler before. --=20 - Tony56 (aka Chandler56) "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!" ____________________________________________________________ [View Quote] =20 =20 Look at all these errors, and out of Eep? A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a scripting language. It is = not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more programming than = some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't = object-oriented. This is top down programming either way. =20 C)Is there something wrong with learning to make "silly" AW bots? I = did. =20 D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this supposed to meen? = Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this, = continue. =20 E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile enough for you? =20 Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-) =20 1)can't, not can's =20 2)"programming, language," =20 3)hope, not home =20 And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple programming = languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet. =20 -Twisted Horizon ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C04D90.B00DD5E0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2614.3500" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3D"MS Sans Serif" size=3D1>Why dwell on something that's = old? And,=20 Java<STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> is a <STRONG>scripting</STRONG> language. = Never=20 heard of a Java<STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> compiler before.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><BR>-- <BR>- Tony56 (aka Chandler56)<BR>"Freedom: That's What The=20 Government Wants You To=20 Believe!"<BR>____________________________________________________________= </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: = 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV>twisted horizon <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:joshua_trask at capecod.com">joshua_trask at capecod.com</A>>= wrote=20 in message <A=20 = href=3D"news:3a105b32 at server1.Activeworlds.com">news:3a105b32 at server1.Act= iveworlds.com</A>...</DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Maybe this message doesn't fit in = this group,=20 but look what I found in an OLD OLD message by Eep.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a = programming,=20 language, Dth. Besides, I sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just = to make=20 silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically = and=20 having to express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic = programming "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I won't be=20 programming any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home = some=20 programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em.<BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Look at all these errors, and out = of=20 Eep?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a = scripting=20 language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more=20 programming than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it = just isn't=20 object-oriented. This is top down programming either way.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>C)Is there something wrong with learning to make = "silly" AW=20 bots? I did.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this = supposed=20 to meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does = this,=20 continue.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile = enough for=20 you?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>1)can't, not can's</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>2)"programming, language,"</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>3)hope, not home</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple=20 programming languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep=20 yet.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>-Twisted = Horizon</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0049_01C04D90.B00DD5E0-- twisted horizonNov 13, 2000, 11:06pm
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04DA9.BB198EC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Who says you need a compiler for a script? There's a difference between = the type of script for, say, Perl SCRIPT or JavaScript and, say, a = Renderware SCRIPT or Xelagot SCRIPT. Why? What makes them different? = Perl and JavaSript are programming languages, and therefor "touch" the = hardware. RenderWare scripts and Xelagot scripts, on the other hand, are = things to be interpreted by a piece of software. Although a perl script = is interpreted by a Perl Parser, and JavaScript is interpreted by, I = don't know, maybe an internet browser or something, a C++ script (Yes, = script, thats the .c or .cpp file) is also interpreted by a C++ = compiler. Just because it's not a compiled language doesn't make it a = script, it can still be a programming language. -Twist [View Quote] ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04DA9.BB198EC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD W3 HTML//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1 = http-equiv=3DContent-Type><!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 = Transitional//EN"> <META content=3D'"MSHTML 4.72.3110.7"' name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Who says you need a compiler for a = script?=20 There's a difference between the type of script for, say, Perl=20 <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> or Java<STRONG>Script</STRONG> and, say, a = Renderware=20 <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> or Xelagot <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG>. Why? What = makes them=20 different? Perl and JavaSript are programming languages, and therefor=20 "touch" the hardware. RenderWare <STRONG>scripts</STRONG> and = Xelagot=20 <STRONG>scripts</STRONG>, on the other hand, are things to be = interpreted by a=20 piece of software. Although a perl <STRONG>script</STRONG> is = interpreted by a=20 Perl Parser, and JavaScript is interpreted by, I don't know, maybe an = internet=20 browser or something, a C++ <STRONG>script</STRONG> (Yes,=20 <STRONG>script</STRONG>, thats the .c or .cpp file) is also interpreted = by a C++=20 compiler. Just because it's not a compiled language doesn't make it a=20 <STRONG>script</STRONG>, it can still be a programming = language.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT = size=3D2>-Twist</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #000000 solid 2px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-LEFT: = 5px"> [View Quote] ------=_NextPart_000_0014_01C04DA9.BB198EC0-- agent1Nov 14, 2000, 12:07am
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C04DA9.9AF2F780 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, C and C++ source code files are just scripts. Then they are compiled into executables to be dealt with by the hardware (or OS... whatever). Javascript and other scripting languages are interpreted each and every time you "run" them. -Agent1 PS-Seeing as how we're using HTML, I might as well use another font or something :) [View Quote] -- - Tony56 (aka Chandler56) "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!" ____________________________________________________________ [View Quote] Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a programming, language, Dth. Besides, I sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just to make silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically and having to express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic programming "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I won't be programming any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home some programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em. Look at all these errors, and out of Eep? A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a scripting language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more programming than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't object-oriented. This is top down programming either way. C)Is there something wrong with learning to make "silly" AW bots? I did. D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this supposed to meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this, continue. E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile enough for you? Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-) 1)can't, not can's 2)"programming, language," 3)hope, not home And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple programming languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet. -Twisted Horizon ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C04DA9.9AF2F780 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type = content=3Dtext/html;charset=3Diso-8859-1> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4207.2601" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV>Yes, C and C++ source code files are just scripts. Then they are = compiled=20 into executables to be dealt with by the hardware (or OS... whatever).=20 Javascript and other scripting languages are interpreted each and every = time you=20 "run" them.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Lucida Handwriting" size=3D4>-Agent1</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>PS-Seeing as how we're using HTML, I might as well = use another=20 font or something :)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20 style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; = BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> <DIV>"twisted horizon" <<A=20 = href=3D"mailto:joshua_trask at capecod.com">joshua_trask at capecod.com</A>>= wrote=20 in message <A=20 = href=3D"news:3a109010 at server1.Activeworlds.com">news:3a109010 at server1.Act= iveworlds.com</A>...</DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Who says you need a compiler for a = script?=20 There's a difference between the type of script for, say, Perl=20 <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> or Java<STRONG>Script</STRONG> and, say, a = Renderware=20 <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG> or Xelagot <STRONG>SCRIPT</STRONG>. Why? What = makes=20 them different? Perl and JavaSript are programming languages, and = therefor=20 "touch" the hardware. RenderWare <STRONG>scripts</STRONG> and Xelagot=20 <STRONG>scripts</STRONG>, on the other hand, are things to be = interpreted by a=20 piece of software. Although a perl <STRONG>script</STRONG> is = interpreted by a=20 Perl Parser, and JavaScript is interpreted by, I don't know, maybe an = internet=20 browser or something, a C++ <STRONG>script</STRONG> (Yes,=20 <STRONG>script</STRONG>, thats the .c or .cpp file) is also = interpreted by a=20 C++ compiler. Just because it's not a compiled language doesn't make = it a=20 <STRONG>script</STRONG>, it can still be a programming = language.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT><FONT = size=3D2>-Twist</FONT></DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE=20 style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px = solid"> [View Quote] programming just to make silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's = stand=20 thinking programmatically and having to express it logically so = until a=20 more visual/graphic/symbolic programming "language" (method, = process, etc)=20 comes along, I won't be programming any time soon. All I can do is = express=20 my ideas and home some programmer(s) like them enough to implement = 'em.<BR></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Look at all these errors, and = out of=20 Eep?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a = scripting=20 language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is = more=20 programming than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, = it just=20 isn't object-oriented. This is top down programming either=20 way.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>C)Is there something wrong with learning to = make "silly"=20 AW bots? I did.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is = this=20 supposed to meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one = thing, it=20 does this, continue.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't = infantile enough=20 for you?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Now for spelling and grammer (SP = :-)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>1)can't, not can's</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>2)"programming, language,"</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>3)hope, not home</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of = simple=20 programming languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep=20 yet.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>-Twisted=20 Horizon</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>= ------=_NextPart_000_0016_01C04DA9.9AF2F780-- grimbleNov 14, 2000, 5:10am
I don't think you have the same concept of a script as everyone else TH. At
the end of the day, he object definition within an RWX file is simply the file format that RenderWare used to describe its objects. Its not really a script any more than a JPEG file is a a script for the definition of an image. Its a structured file format - just not compressed - that object builders in AW edit. Most people's definition of a script is a run-time interpreted language. What is yours? Grims [View Quote] -- - Tony56 (aka Chandler56) "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!" ____________________________________________________________ [View Quote] Javascript is a SCRIPTING, not a programming, language, Dth. Besides, I sure as hell wouldn't learn programming just to make silly AW bots... Unfortunately I can's stand thinking programmatically and having to express it logically so until a more visual/graphic/symbolic programming "language" (method, process, etc) comes along, I won't be programming any time soon. All I can do is express my ideas and home some programmer(s) like them enough to implement 'em. Look at all these errors, and out of Eep? A & B)JavaScript (not Javascript) is NOT a scripting language. It is not RenderWare style, nor Perl style (which is more programming than some things) BASIC is not a scripting language, it just isn't object-oriented. This is top down programming either way. C)Is there something wrong with learning to make "silly" AW bots? I did. D)Thinking programmatically? What the hell is this supposed to meen? Programming is, at a basic level, write one thing, it does this, continue. E)What's the matter? Visual Basic isn't infantile enough for you? Now for spelling and grammer (SP :-) 1)can't, not can's 2)"programming, language," 3)hope, not home And now we have the AW SDK in all sorts of simple programming languages, yet I haven't found any bots out of Eep yet. -Twisted Horizon |
