ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
bot telegrams? (Sdk)
bot telegrams? // Sdkthe derekNov 20, 2000, 12:38am
why dont bots send telegrams? i know that could be
abused but what if you could have an option to ignore people permanantly that would make you not hear them talk or get thier telegrams? joemanNov 20, 2000, 11:57am
As i quote ROLAND in this one "It would be a race to see the first person to
telegram everyone in the univerce" Also the telegram banning hasnt been implimented in the browser yet... Look for that in 3.2....... Thanx Joeman [View Quote] the derekNov 20, 2000, 11:03pm
ok so what about 3.2? then you could only accept tgrams from people on your CT?
that way it would be harder for a bot to abuse telegrams... what if bot could only telegram its owner? [View Quote] > As i quote ROLAND in this one "It would be a race to see the first person to > telegram everyone in the univerce" > > Also the telegram banning hasnt been implimented in the browser yet... Look > for that in 3.2....... > > Thanx > Joeman > [View Quote] joemanNov 21, 2000, 12:55am
What i mean by that issss.... You can denie telegrams from ppl... I think
it would be hard to put the feture of a bot only telegraming its owner in the sdk, anyways, people can find out a way to make it so it can telegram whoever it wants... Thanx Joeman [View Quote] the derekNov 21, 2000, 12:58am
not really i mean they made bots so they can only get citname and citnumber
unless logged in with privs of cit#1 and there are other ristrictions too. lol i dont wanna argue i just want input form people and so ffar youve been the only one. ANYONE ELSE WANNA SAY SOMETHING? ANYHTING? [View Quote] > What i mean by that issss.... You can denie telegrams from ppl... I think > it would be hard to put the feture of a bot only telegraming its owner in > the sdk, anyways, people can find out a way to make it so it can telegram > whoever it wants... > > Thanx > Joeman [View Quote] agent1Nov 21, 2000, 12:17pm
Roland has said that once there is a telegram mute feature, it might be possible to allow bots to send telegrams. One option would be to have an "Allow bot telegrams?" switch or something.
-Agent1 [View Quote] the derekNov 22, 2000, 1:09am
ohhh ok. well maybe he should post his opinions about this here?
[View Quote] > Roland has said that once there is a telegram mute feature, it might be possible to allow bots to send telegrams. One option would be to have an "Allow bot telegrams?" switch or something. > > -Agent1 > [View Quote] tony56Nov 22, 2000, 8:08am
Doubt he'd want to post with all this negativity about.
-- - Tony56 (chandler56 at mail.com) "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!" ____________________________________________________________ [View Quote] agent1Nov 22, 2000, 12:13pm
*sigh* Derek, even though I don't have to deal with your foolishness directly, I can see it in the reply... Check the Tech Talk logs at http://tnlc.com/mauz/
-Agent [View Quote] the derekNov 22, 2000, 3:47pm
well i didnt ask for any negativity in this i am tired of people always
trying to put something in and then ruining the few posts that are on topic to your standards [View Quote] > Doubt he'd want to post with all this negativity about. > > -- > - Tony56 (chandler56 at mail.com) > "Freedom: That's What The Government Wants You To Believe!" > ____________________________________________________________ [View Quote] twisted horizonNov 23, 2000, 12:00am
Well, think about this. If someone has an idea and everyone says that's a
great idea, no matter what it is, then we get in a lot of trouble. If we say we hate it, then someone will get mad at us for just saying we hate it, and not even giving any opinion. Therefor, we must give our "negativity" to bad ideas to show why they shouldn't be done. Take it as criticism to the idea, not the person. -Twist [View Quote] |