Although I do not agree with your examples, I agree with you in the
point of it. If Bush was honest enough to say that he wants to attack
Iraq for economical reasons, for private revenge reasons, for religious
mission reasons, for military and for imperialistic reasons, I would
absolutely not agree with it, but - I could at least develop any respect
for him as an honest and upright man, and as much as I dislike Rumsfeld,
at least he speaks his mind. :-)
But so - I do not even feel the least respect, he rather appears to me
as a bitter, an angry man from some comic book. Honestly. Sadly.
[View Quote]count dracula wrote:
>
> Of all arguments trying to justify the war, this must be the most stupid.
> I wish I had knewn this in school; whenever I did not know any question in a
> test, I would have simply stated: I know the answer but I will not write it.
> If I ever go to court, I will say: Yes I can prove it, but I will not, you
> just have to trust me.
>
> What hurts me most in this whole matter is the trying to jutify the war with
> lies.
> If only Bush would step up infront of the TV cameras and once be honest and
> say something like:
> " Hi, my name is George and I am an alchoholic. I have other problems also
> like agressivity.
> I am not very smart but I have a lot of power. I have decided that USA shall
> bomb Iraque, because I do not like Saddam and I have a need of bombing
> someone; he also happens to have a lot of oil in his land.
> I do not give a fuck about UN and I do not even want to have a peacefull
> solution. I will not either have a debate on TV with Saddam, because he is
> probably much smarter than I am, and I would only look like a fool.
> I do not either care about the sunnis, shias and kurds (some groups of
> people someone has written down for George on a paper). I just need
> something to bomb that is not to close of USA."
>
> If he would be honest like this, I would not have such a big problem with
> the war, because then we would know who is the attacking part. But trying to
> brainwash people through media and claiming to have proofs, even trying to
> make the war sound like a good thing, insults the inteligency of most
> people. Furthemore some people seem to be upset that not all countries in
> NATO is villing to help this maniac on his mission, when infact these
> countries has understood what NATO is. It is a DEFENCE alliance not an
> attack alliance. The action of USA (Bush) is very similar to skinheads,
> nazis and other scumbags: If you are not on our side, you are against us.
>
> Drac
> binarybud <leo at realPANTStourvision.com> kirjoitti
> viestissä:3e6793be$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> it will compromise our intelligence sources, we cannot show this undeniable
> evidence right now. Someday the WORLD will understand why we have taken
> this hard stance against Saddam. He NEEDS to go. And for now we are
> strong enough to take the heat. Bu we must stand strong against Saddam, or
> his neighbors will ALL pay the price...and we cannot afford to let that
> happen..
> news:3e678c10$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> to
> and
|
