ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Linux (General Discussion)
Linux // General DiscussionbrandonNov 6, 2001, 11:28pm
well i've always wanted this. And i know theres several versions like Red
Hat and so on.... well what do you think is the best version and where is it avaliable ananasNov 6, 2001, 11:39pm
Suse has quite good management tools, but it's bloated.
RedHat has a minimized version that comes on only one CD, that looked quite acceptable to me. Mandrake seems to be similar to RedHat in what they install for a basic system, not too bloated. I heard about the Corel that it's a good starter system I think the best would be to check http://www.linuxiso.org/ for the smallest systems, look if it contains all components you need (kernel version, hardware support, web support, DSL) and decide then. Always a quite slim option : Free BSD [View Quote] -- "_ | /\ \ / __/ /_ bowenNov 7, 2001, 12:08am
In my opinion Redhat is the best for a beginner (which would be an expert in
windows, no matter how good you are linux is a very different OS and has a steeper learning curve compared to windows ) to pick up and really get in depth with it fast. Plus WINE (good for AW) seems to be readily available and well documented for RH 7.1 and 7.2. Of course you have to account for the ISP too.. if they support linux's dialup most DUN will ie. Earthlink and Juno (I think). If you're on cable it should be very easy with DHCP. --Bowen-- [View Quote] macb zzzzzNov 7, 2001, 1:20am
Just from personal experience...
I tried Redhat 7.1 and Suse 7.2 at about he same time...then both were the current releases. Doing out of the box installs with no manual tweaking... Redhat seemed like a cleaner install process. But after I had used both for a while I noticed that Redhat became a bit flakey. Soundcard, touchpad and various other devices would work one time, but not the next. Suse never supported the touchpad on my laptop, but everything else was fine and always worked. Suse is done in Germany, Redhat in the US. Suse has a few problems in the area of documentation. There is a tendency for error messages to be poorly translated into English. Of course BOTH systems use open source from all over the world, but I would say Redhat had been more thoroughly "cleaned up" for English speaking people. Another MAJOR difference IMHO is that Redhat favors the Gnome user interface while Suse favors KDE. Gnome and IDE are the "windows" part of Linux that provide you with a desktop, icons, and the basic toolset for doing things. Since both use the X-windows as a base, many programs will run under both KDE and Gnome, but there are also quite a few that only work in one or the other. Both Redhat and Suse include Gnome and KDE, but to me they each work better with the one they default to (which might explain some of my problems with Redhat). Having used both for a while I decided that I preferred KDE over Gnome (at least for now... they both are under active development). Since Suse defaults to KDE, I found that its administrative tools tended to work better in KDE. The same is probably true of Redhat and Gnome. And finally, Redhat is the only Linux company coming close to making a profit at this point. They invented the RPM system that is used to package applications software distributions. Suse uses RPMs too. Redhat is slightly more likely to be around in 5 years than Suse if that's an issue for you. (Wasn't for me). I am running Suse on an older desktop machine and on a new laptop. The Laptop is dual-booted with Windows ME (*holds nose*). Using the included WINE package I got AW running on both systems with a few hours tinkering. At first only AW 2 would work there since the 3D graphics card support doesn't work under WINE. With 3.2 I get fairly fast graphics under Linux in software mode... almost the same frame rate as with windows USING the hardware 3D!! There are a few minor "bugs" running in this mode, but no crashes or hangs, just convenience issues. I started it up the other day and got into a chat and forgot that I was using Linux. I had several other active programs running at the same time in the background, something that doesn't work too well for me using Windows. If you decided to try Linux: make sure you get the new Netscape 6.2 installed right away, it totally replaces all the functionality of Internet Explorer and Outlook Express. Netscape is BACK ! Also, both products include Star Office which has the functionality of Word, Excel and a few other MS office programs. Star office takes some getting used to. Its a bit slow, especially getting started. Once I launch it I just leave it running. If those two products aren't enough to worry Microsoft, check out http://www.lindows.com who's plan is to make just about all Windows programs run under Linux (without having to pay royalties to Microsoft). If they succeed (and they only think they need about a year) the most secure jobs at Microsoft with be the corporate lawyers. We live in interesting times. [View Quote] bowenNov 7, 2001, 1:51am
Nice informative post :) but WINE has supported 3d cards for a while.. but
you needed to get a CD application that has directX instal since the directX install goes from the web now (MS's approach to stop WINE). But Redhat 7 works perfect for me in KDE, might just be your configuration since not all things are compatible (majorly being window oriented hardware like winmodems and winsound cards). Redhat is, like I said, more towards beginners, but is still great for experienced people who can change the stuff fast (I don't use the non-professional versions of redhat so I don't know if that's true for the normal one). KDE is better IMHO too (my redhat defaulted to KDE not gnome). This is my rave for now :) --Bowen-- [View Quote] jermeNov 11, 2001, 10:41am
I run RedHat Linux 7 ( It's about time to upgrade...lol ) on a Dell
PowerEdge server. I've had absolutly no problems with it. Dell supports RedHat, and has several great newgroups. ( You can speak directly to the head engineer of the Linux division ). The only complaint I have aginst RedHat is the FTP server they include. wu-ftp has root exploits right and left... so, that'll be the first thing you have to change. I must admit, I've never used any other distro of Linux, but why would I? ;-) -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Jeremy Booker JTech Web Systems (www.JTechWebSystems.com -- Coming Soon) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [View Quote] |