|
|
Aw is becoming more and more messed up every day... (General Discussion)
Aw is becoming more and more messed up every day... // General Discussion
Oct 4, 2001, 2:42am
It may be just me but I look at AW now and see that half of the good
smart, and happy people are now gone. AW has turned into a place where
it seems to be more worthwhile to put out a version that half the things
don't work, so they can do a thing called '3D Home Pages' which isn't
nothing more than a trial world. Has the Active Worlds staff become more
loving of money than the citizens that occupy it??
Or is it that they just dont care enoughf to make shure everything is
working and people are happy. It seems to me that they are more occupyed
with money than making shure that people are happy and having fun in
there Trial Worlds aka. - 3D Home Pages, and just getting more juno
people on. Like we need them, all they want is a place to have cyber
sex. Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
ask if I wanna 'cyber'. In real life I wouldent mind; But I come to
Active Worlds to have some fun and hang with my homeis and do something
instead of homework.
So im asking is it just me or has ActiveWorlds changed?
--
PS: I know im gonna get yelled at for this but oh well....
--
TrekkerX - CEO
Commatron
http://www.commatron.com
Oct 4, 2001, 3:36am
Sad to say, Trekker, but it's just you. AW has been like this for as
long as AWC has owned it. You've just finally, after months and years of
seeing it in action, come to realize what most of the rest of the
disgruntled regulars (Eep, KAH, myself, et al) have come to believe. I'm
sure that, as time goes by, more people will wake up to what's
happening. The only question is, even if we were to somehow muster a
majority opinion on the matter, would it do any good? (see Citizen's
Union debacle as an example :P)
[View Quote]
> It may be just me but I look at AW now and see that half of the good
> smart, and happy people are now gone. AW has turned into a place where
> it seems to be more worthwhile to put out a version that half the things
> don't work, so they can do a thing called '3D Home Pages' which isn't
> nothing more than a trial world. Has the Active Worlds staff become more
> loving of money than the citizens that occupy it??
>
> Or is it that they just dont care enoughf to make shure everything is
> working and people are happy. It seems to me that they are more occupyed
> with money than making shure that people are happy and having fun in
> there Trial Worlds aka. - 3D Home Pages, and just getting more juno
> people on. Like we need them, all they want is a place to have cyber
> sex. Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
> ask if I wanna 'cyber'. In real life I wouldent mind; But I come to
> Active Worlds to have some fun and hang with my homeis and do something
> instead of homework.
>
> So im asking is it just me or has ActiveWorlds changed?
>
> --
>
> PS: I know im gonna get yelled at for this but oh well....
>
> --
> TrekkerX - CEO
> Commatron
> http://www.commatron.com
>
>
>
--
Goober King
He just can't let it go...
rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
Oct 4, 2001, 4:53am
AW has been going down the tubes and into the dumpster for years. "3D homepages" are simply AWC's latest marketing attempt that will most definitely fail. Why? Because it's false advertising. Trial worlds AREN'T homepages, 3D or otherwise. Homepages are HTML-scripted text pages displayed in web browsers. AW worlds are not. Rick, JP, and all those other putz "directors" (clueless idiots would be a better label) are simply so out of touch with AW that they just do NOT know how to market or manage it at all. I don't know what it's going to take to clue these idiots into what AW REALLY is (and can become), but I've been trying for YEARS without success. One can only do so much with ineptness before it's essentually pointless and futile...
[View Quote]
> It may be just me but I look at AW now and see that half of the good
> smart, and happy people are now gone. AW has turned into a place where
> it seems to be more worthwhile to put out a version that half the things
> don't work, so they can do a thing called '3D Home Pages' which isn't
> nothing more than a trial world. Has the Active Worlds staff become more
> loving of money than the citizens that occupy it??
>
> Or is it that they just dont care enoughf to make shure everything is
> working and people are happy. It seems to me that they are more occupyed
> with money than making shure that people are happy and having fun in
> there Trial Worlds aka. - 3D Home Pages, and just getting more juno
> people on. Like we need them, all they want is a place to have cyber
> sex. Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
> ask if I wanna 'cyber'. In real life I wouldent mind; But I come to
> Active Worlds to have some fun and hang with my homeis and do something
> instead of homework.
>
> So im asking is it just me or has ActiveWorlds changed?
Oct 4, 2001, 9:16am
How come everyone uses the same complaint? Be original!
-Xel
PS. *sudden thought* oh wait, everyones complaining about the same thing,
cause its still true :(
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <troop2 at empirenet.com> wrote in message
news:3BBBE7D8.ADB63160 at empirenet.com...
> It may be just me but I look at AW now and see that half of the good
> smart, and happy people are now gone. AW has turned into a place where
> it seems to be more worthwhile to put out a version that half the things
> don't work, so they can do a thing called '3D Home Pages' which isn't
> nothing more than a trial world. Has the Active Worlds staff become more
> loving of money than the citizens that occupy it??
>
> Or is it that they just dont care enoughf to make shure everything is
> working and people are happy. It seems to me that they are more occupyed
> with money than making shure that people are happy and having fun in
> there Trial Worlds aka. - 3D Home Pages, and just getting more juno
> people on. Like we need them, all they want is a place to have cyber
> sex. Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
> ask if I wanna 'cyber'. In real life I wouldent mind; But I come to
> Active Worlds to have some fun and hang with my homeis and do something
> instead of homework.
>
> So im asking is it just me or has ActiveWorlds changed?
>
> --
>
> PS: I know im gonna get yelled at for this but oh well....
>
> --
> TrekkerX - CEO
> Commatron
> http://www.commatron.com
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 3:19pm
Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
side of the debate to this topic.
This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose a
particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it, simply
because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say anything -
they like things the way they are.
I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and if
you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less complete
understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
don't know much about their computers.
Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried to
stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do with
Trekker's argument.
And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here complained
for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing new
browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate in
the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
not improving every day.
Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
"downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
[View Quote]"goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
> Sad to say, Trekker, but it's just you. AW has been like this for as
> long as AWC has owned it. You've just finally, after months and years of
> seeing it in action, come to realize what most of the rest of the
> disgruntled regulars (Eep, KAH, myself, et al) have come to believe. I'm
> sure that, as time goes by, more people will wake up to what's
> happening. The only question is, even if we were to somehow muster a
> majority opinion on the matter, would it do any good? (see Citizen's
> Union debacle as an example :P)
>
> trekkerx wrote:
>
>
>
> --
> Goober King
> He just can't let it go...
> rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 4:13pm
Well said!!! Thanks,
Andras
[View Quote]brant wrote:
>
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it, simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 5:42pm
I totally agree with you Brant :-)
Beardo
[View Quote]"brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and
before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose
a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it,
simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say
anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If
you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and
if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less
complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it
immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried
to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do
with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's
stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here
complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing
new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site.
Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate
in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and
knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
of
I'm
where
things
more
occupyed
something
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 5:48pm
Congrats Brant, well said:))
Moria
[View Quote]brant <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose
a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it,
simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say
anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and
if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less
complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried
to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do
with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here
complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing
new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate
in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
things
more
occupyed
something
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 5:51pm
Is it just me, or have some of our long-time optimists become cynics? :( I
hate to see that happen.
Brant, well said. I think those who do support a particular topic should be
more vocal. It adds support to the cause.
AWDebate and Citizens Union were essentially the same idea wrapped up in
different wrapping paper. When and if that world opens, it's going to make
a great addition.
Ever since I've come here, I've seen nothing but improvement in the way
Active Worlds handles the development of its community. However, all of you
whining about how the community has gone downhill (and maybe I count myself
in this category), let's do something about it! AWC can't do everything.
Programming wise, like eep has said, things seem to have stagnated a bit
("seem" is a key word here). With the addition of a second programmer,
hopefully more things will get done so they can concentrate more on fixing
the existing bugs as well as continually developing the software to attract
more customers (Business 101).
--
SW Chris
Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
[View Quote]"brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose
a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it,
simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say
anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and
if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less
complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried
to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do
with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here
complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing
new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate
in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
things
more
occupyed
something
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 7:16pm
3D homepages are nice, but the name is stupid, they're worlds, not
homepages. they could've found a better name like 3D homeworlds or
something. And these nice additions won't change the fact that the leaders
of the AWC aren't really as competent as they should be... just look at
Facter, he defended them to the last second, but he obviously wasn't too
happy about them himself... but he's a nice, loyal guy, and he helped them.
too bad they obviously didn't do much to return the favor, we could've
needed Facter, he was very good at his job, but now he's gone :-((
KAH
[View Quote]"brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose
a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it,
simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say
anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and
if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less
complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried
to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do
with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here
complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing
new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate
in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
things
more
occupyed
something
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 7:16pm
3D homepages are nice, but the name is stupid, they're worlds, not
homepages. they could've found a better name like 3D homeworlds or
something. And these nice additions won't change the fact that the leaders
of the AWC aren't really as competent as they should be... just look at
Facter, he defended them to the last second, but he obviously wasn't too
happy about them himself... but he's a nice, loyal guy, and he helped them.
too bad they obviously didn't do much to return the favor, we could've
needed Facter, he was very good at his job, but now he's gone :-((
KAH
[View Quote]"brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Though this post will start a flame war, I thought I should add the other
> side of the debate to this topic.
>
> This debate has been going on for years. If you do a newsgroup search,
> you'll find posts on this topic that date back to the 2.2 days and before.
> Also, it seems that the same people are always continuning this debate -
> just look at the three people who posted to this thread. Goober, you've
> always felt this way, and so has Trekker and to some extent Xel. While
> you're entitled to your opinions, let me point out that people who oppose
a
> particular topic will always be more vocal than those who support it,
simply
> because those who think that something is great don't NEED to say
anything -
> they like things the way they are.
>
> I don't see why people continue to argue about these 3D homepages. If you
> like them, great - sign up for one today. If not, don't sign up. Unlike
> browser improvements that affect everyone, you have a simple choice, and
if
> you refuse, nothing bad will happen to you. Personally, I think that 3D
> homepages are a great idea for those people who (gasp!) have a less
complete
> understanding of computers than the posters in this thread do. When
> something comes out that caters to newbies, everyone flames it immediately
> without realizing that the majority of AW citizens aren't programmers and
> don't know much about their computers.
>
> Second, cybersex has nothing to do with AW. AW has, from day one, tried
to
> stop cybersex from occurring in its universe - look at its Conduct
> Guidelines. This comment is completely unfounded and has nothing to do
with
> Trekker's argument.
>
> And third, I don't see AW "going downhill" anytime soon. Sure, AW's stock
> is in the dumps, but so is every other company's. Everyone here
complained
> for AW to take the opinions of its citizens into account when releasing
new
> browsers, and they have - look at the new Feature Vote site. Furthermore,
> the release of 3.2 allows the 25% of users who couldn't fully participate
in
> the universe to do so now - I don't see how you see that as bad.
>
> Recently, the tourists I've come across are more friendly and knowledgable
> than ever. The caretakers of many worlds are finally dedicated to the
> improvement of their worlds, whereas it seemed as if many worlds remained
> dead before. If you'd like a list, I can provide you with the names of
> dozens of citizens that prove just why AW is at least holding its own, if
> not improving every day.
>
> Please justify your arguments instead of simply stating that AW is going
> "downhill" because you can't take advantage of a 3D homepage.
>
> "goober king" <rar1 at acsu.buffalo.edu> wrote in message
> news:3BBBF51B.6010905 at acsu.buffalo.edu...
things
more
occupyed
something
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 7:25pm
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! this stupid lame news
server messed up my posts, why can't they get something less lame?? (like
something that allows capitals in the posting names, doesn't crash all the
time, etc)
KAH
[View Quote]"kah" <kah at kahbot.com> wrote in message
news:3bbcd1ad at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 3D homepages are nice, but the name is stupid, they're worlds, not
> homepages. they could've found a better name like 3D homeworlds or
> something. And these nice additions won't change the fact that the leaders
> of the AWC aren't really as competent as they should be... just look at
> Facter, he defended them to the last second, but he obviously wasn't too
> happy about them himself... but he's a nice, loyal guy, and he helped
them.
> too bad they obviously didn't do much to return the favor, we could've
> needed Facter, he was very good at his job, but now he's gone :-((
>
> KAH
>
> "brant" <awteen at shoemakervillage.org> wrote in message
> news:3bbc9a1e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
other
before.
oppose
> a
> simply
> anything -
you
Unlike
> if
> complete
immediately
and
> to
> with
stock
> complained
> new
Furthermore,
participate
> in
knowledgable
remained
if
of
I'm
where
> things
isn't
> more
is
> occupyed
and
> something
>
>
>
>
>
>
|
Oct 4, 2001, 8:44pm
[View Quote]"trekkerx" <troop2 at empirenet.com> wrote in message
news:3BBBE7D8.ADB63160 at empirenet.com...
> Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
> ask if I wanna 'cyber'.
|
You said pop ^_^
Oct 4, 2001, 9:59pm
lol
[View Quote]
[View Quote]> "trekkerx" <troop2 at empirenet.com> wrote in message
> news:3BBBE7D8.ADB63160 at empirenet.com...
>
> You said pop ^_^
|
--
TrekkerX - CEO
Commatron
http://www.commatron.com
Oct 5, 2001, 11:29am
[View Quote]
[View Quote]
And that justifies in lying to them and leading them to believe worlds are something they're not? Open your fucking eyes, Brant...
Uh huh...yet AWC allows all those cybersex-latent gor worlds run rampant. Shut up, hypocrite!
No, once again you fail to look into things before making yourself look like an ignorant fool. AWLD has been floundering near or under $1 for a LONG time now--MUCH longer than this latest "recession"-prone market.
Oh and Andras, you're not helping by mindlessing agreeing with this twit, either.
Oh, sure, it LOOKS like AWC is starting to care more about what its users want, but until ANYTHING is implemented BECAUSE of the feature vote I won't be bending over backwards and sucking off AWC like YOU seem to be doing, lemming.
> Furthermore,
Fully? Relative to what? AW 3.2 does NOT look the same as 3.1. Perhaps you missed all the lighting bugs and other problems?? Or do you only use AW to mindlessly chat in and don't ever do any REAL work with it? Figures...
Bahahahaha! That's funny...gee, and all this happened since 3.2's release, eh?? Shut the fuck up, you ignorant toad. You know NOT what you babble about.
Open your fucking eyes and read up on why AW (start with http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/history.html) is and HAS been going downhill for YEARS, newbie.
Oct 5, 2001, 2:19pm
Nobody can justify their arguements if they don't happen to agree with you,
eep. We all know that.
--
SW Chris
Eagle Scout, Philosopher, Peacemaker, and... Kung Fu Master?
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame1.html
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3BBDB512.1710BB3B at tnlc.com...
> andras wrote:
>
you
Unlike
and if
3D
complete
immediately
and
>
> And that justifies in lying to them and leading them to believe worlds are
something they're not? Open your fucking eyes, Brant...
>
tried to
do with
>
> Uh huh...yet AWC allows all those cybersex-latent gor worlds run rampant.
Shut up, hypocrite!
>
stock
>
> No, once again you fail to look into things before making yourself look
like an ignorant fool. AWLD has been floundering near or under $1 for a LONG
time now--MUCH longer than this latest "recession"-prone market.
>
> Oh and Andras, you're not helping by mindlessing agreeing with this twit,
either.
>
releasing new
>
> Oh, sure, it LOOKS like AWC is starting to care more about what its users
want, but until ANYTHING is implemented BECAUSE of the feature vote I won't
be bending over backwards and sucking off AWC like YOU seem to be doing,
lemming.
>
participate in
>
> Fully? Relative to what? AW 3.2 does NOT look the same as 3.1. Perhaps you
missed all the lighting bugs and other problems?? Or do you only use AW to
mindlessly chat in and don't ever do any REAL work with it? Figures...
>
knowledgable
remained
of
if
>
> Bahahahaha! That's funny...gee, and all this happened since 3.2's release,
eh?? Shut the fuck up, you ignorant toad. You know NOT what you babble
about.
>
going
>
> Open your fucking eyes and read up on why AW (start with
http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/history.html) is and HAS been going downhill for
YEARS, newbie.
>
|
Oct 5, 2001, 3:49pm
Geeze, eep!!!
You are getting ruder and cruder and harder to diaper every year!!! Want a
little salt to go with all that pepper on your tongue??? :o\
*hugs you don't want*
Daphne
[View Quote]eep <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3BBDB512.1710BB3B at tnlc.com...
> andras wrote:
>
you
Unlike
and if
3D
complete
immediately
and
>
> And that justifies in lying to them and leading them to believe worlds are
something they're not? Open your fucking eyes, Brant...
|
Oct 7, 2001, 5:08pm
Trekkerx, don't take it bad, but I lurk through aw for now a certain time
and your words reminds me the well known speech : how sweet was the past...
I do remember some "happy" few like Pharao and others that were quite
annoying... remember ?
I prefer to think that today worth yesterday and better build what we want
better than complain about dead yesterdays...
A bit "Here and now" philosophy but by these days we all better watch at our
reality.
Laurent
"trekkerx" <troop2 at empirenet.com> a écrit dans le message de news:
3BBBE7D8.ADB63160 at empirenet.com...
> It may be just me but I look at AW now and see that half of the good
> smart, and happy people are now gone. AW has turned into a place where
> it seems to be more worthwhile to put out a version that half the things
> don't work, so they can do a thing called '3D Home Pages' which isn't
> nothing more than a trial world. Has the Active Worlds staff become more
> loving of money than the citizens that occupy it??
>
> Or is it that they just dont care enoughf to make shure everything is
> working and people are happy. It seems to me that they are more occupyed
> with money than making shure that people are happy and having fun in
> there Trial Worlds aka. - 3D Home Pages, and just getting more juno
> people on. Like we need them, all they want is a place to have cyber
> sex. Nowadays I cant pop into my world and have a tourest come by and
> ask if I wanna 'cyber'. In real life I wouldent mind; But I come to
> Active Worlds to have some fun and hang with my homeis and do something
> instead of homework.
>
> So im asking is it just me or has ActiveWorlds changed?
>
> --
>
> PS: I know im gonna get yelled at for this but oh well....
>
> --
> TrekkerX - CEO
> Commatron
> http://www.commatron.com
>
>
|
