|
Re: AWI ... pw protection please??? (Wishlist)
Re: AWI ... pw protection please??? // Wishlist
Mar 16, 2004, 5:05pm
Enzo, I also rcvd an E-Mail from said Christopher Stevens, and the last
one I sent to the FBI and included the fact this person is a hacker and
virul writer. Hopes that they find exactly what was said too. If nothing
else but a hacker trying to steal sensative information, which is a
federal offense anyway.
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:405626e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: Hello Mod,
:
: I am not sure why you think we didn't go after M A T T. Everything we
said
: was and is true. The fact that people can get away with online
crimes is
: only a reflection that they can get away with real-life crimes also.
We are
: still taking action against M A T T but it takes a lot of time and if
: certain law enforcement agencies do not act on our complaints, how can
we
: change it? I will not apologize for the judicial system of the
United
: States as I have control over it.
:
: E
:
:
: "mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
: news:4054785a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > Well here's the deal. The way AW protects OP PWs isn't bad, it is
just
: old.
: > There first mistake was not really taking legal action against matt,
and
: > just saying they did. Remember the last list of op pws that went
around.
: > That was because of AWProxy 3.1 that was still floating around.
After aw
: > disabled use of the 3.2 browser that was solved, but now matt
decided to
: > release his AWProxy 3.4 that he stole from a certain someone. Now
that,
: that
: > is floating around, no pw will be safe again. That fact of the
matter is
: > this 99% of people on aw wouldn't have the ability to decrypt op pws
if
: the
: > encryption method wasn't practically public. What I don't understand
is
: back
: > in the day when they changed the encryption method for cit pws why
they
: > didn't change it for op pws too...hmmm? So the solution is simple
change
: the
: > encryption method and all pws will be safe, because those that can
: actually
: > get it again, certainly wouldn't be releasing any lists :)
: >
: > -Mod
: > "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
: > news:4054496a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
: > > AWI ... what is so hard about pw protecting an op? Is there no way
to
: > > protect items we've paid for? I would think this would be your #1
: priority
: > > no? I mean the truth is, I already *paid for stuff* and am using
it,
: I've
: > > done my part by attempting to pw protect them but truly it's the
: > > model/object creators that are getting burned here isn't it? Can't
you
: do
: > > something about it?
: > >
: > > Inquiring minds wanna know...
: > >
: > > LNH <<< *doesn't get it*
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: > >
: >
: >
:
:
|
|
