|
Re: AWI ... pw protection please??? (Wishlist)
Re: AWI ... pw protection please??? // Wishlist
Mar 15, 2004, 7:57pm
Hello Mod,
I am not sure why you think we didn't go after M A T T. Everything we said
was and is true. The fact that people can get away with online crimes is
only a reflection that they can get away with real-life crimes also. We are
still taking action against M A T T but it takes a lot of time and if
certain law enforcement agencies do not act on our complaints, how can we
change it? I will not apologize for the judicial system of the United
States as I have control over it.
E
[View Quote]"mod" <mod at darkbirdie.com> wrote in message
news:4054785a$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Well here's the deal. The way AW protects OP PWs isn't bad, it is just
old.
> There first mistake was not really taking legal action against matt, and
> just saying they did. Remember the last list of op pws that went around.
> That was because of AWProxy 3.1 that was still floating around. After aw
> disabled use of the 3.2 browser that was solved, but now matt decided to
> release his AWProxy 3.4 that he stole from a certain someone. Now that,
that
> is floating around, no pw will be safe again. That fact of the matter is
> this 99% of people on aw wouldn't have the ability to decrypt op pws if
the
> encryption method wasn't practically public. What I don't understand is
back
> in the day when they changed the encryption method for cit pws why they
> didn't change it for op pws too...hmmm? So the solution is simple change
the
> encryption method and all pws will be safe, because those that can
actually
> get it again, certainly wouldn't be releasing any lists :)
>
> -Mod
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4054496a at server1.Activeworlds.com...
priority
I've
do
>
>
|
|
