|
[Request] Administrative Ratings (Wishlist)
[Request] Administrative Ratings // Wishlist
Apr 18, 2003, 5:52pm
AWI for certain worlds, needs to deem the world rating, certain worlds (aka
all gor worlds) must be set to a rating of R or higher. But yet i do not see
them all with that rating, therefor i think AWI should be able to lock in a
certain rating for certain worlds. Just a request so children are not
entering those worlds.
--
Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
Apr 18, 2003, 7:08pm
Same with DSEden that is now marked as PG-13, definately needs a much higher
rating!
Agreed
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3ea0496e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AWI for certain worlds, needs to deem the world rating, certain worlds
(aka
> all gor worlds) must be set to a rating of R or higher. But yet i do not
see
> them all with that rating, therefor i think AWI should be able to lock in
a
> certain rating for certain worlds. Just a request so children are not
> entering those worlds.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2003, 7:13pm
If they require you to be 18, they should be marked R. If they require you
to be 21, they should be marked X.
[View Quote]"brock" <Brock at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:3ea0496e$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> AWI for certain worlds, needs to deem the world rating, certain worlds
(aka
> all gor worlds) must be set to a rating of R or higher. But yet i do not
see
> them all with that rating, therefor i think AWI should be able to lock in
a
> certain rating for certain worlds. Just a request so children are not
> entering those worlds.
>
> --
> Brock - 308723 - DE Leader
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2003, 8:08pm
oh come on now, DSEden is a fun family environment! lol
- Mark
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3ea05b24$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Same with DSEden that is now marked as PG-13, definately needs a much
higher
> rating!
>
> Agreed
|
Apr 18, 2003, 8:09pm
Note that the ratings are guides only, ive visited X rated worlds
repeatedly, as long as some kid dosent go in there without knowing that
there may be unsuitable material then there is really no problem.
- Mark
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3ea05c84$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> If they require you to be 18, they should be marked R. If they require
you
> to be 21, they should be marked X.
|
Apr 18, 2003, 10:16pm
The point was, Unsuitable material that the rating is saying it is okay for
those over 13. Which is not acceptable. We are asking that AWI take some
worlds into consideration and make their rating is appropriate. As an adult
world, I would not be offended if I was asked to make my rating higher. But
stating an adult world is PG-13 is not cool. If a parent makes sure their
child can go into PG-13 worlds, and has the other worlds password protected
so their child cant get into the adult worlds....well, that just failed with
half of gor and dseden, didnt it?
As a parent, I think this is very necessary. Now, will AWI read this?
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ea06980$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Note that the ratings are guides only, ive visited X rated worlds
> repeatedly, as long as some kid dosent go in there without knowing that
> there may be unsuitable material then there is really no problem.
>
> - Mark
>
> "goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
> news:3ea05c84$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you
>
>
>
|
Apr 18, 2003, 11:14pm
most likely not, theyre probably already / have created a plan already.
- Mark
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3ea08758$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Now, will AWI read this?
|
Apr 19, 2003, 1:16pm
Worlds which were rated R in a 3.3 browser will show up as PG-13 in a 3.4 browser because the numeric rating used internally has changed meanings as of AW 3.4 to accomodate the addition of the PG-13 rating. This should be only a temporary set-back. As for worlds having a rating enforced, I think yes there should be a way to do that, but it should be used extremely sparingly because to do otherwise would discourage attempts at changing a world's rating and content to something seen as being less objectionable, and just because a world "had" a certain rating doesn't and shouldn't mean that the people in charge of it can't ever decide to change it.
TechnoZeus
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message news:3ea08758$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> The point was, Unsuitable material that the rating is saying it is okay for
> those over 13. Which is not acceptable. We are asking that AWI take some
> worlds into consideration and make their rating is appropriate. As an adult
> world, I would not be offended if I was asked to make my rating higher. But
> stating an adult world is PG-13 is not cool. If a parent makes sure their
> child can go into PG-13 worlds, and has the other worlds password protected
> so their child cant get into the adult worlds....well, that just failed with
> half of gor and dseden, didnt it?
>
> As a parent, I think this is very necessary. Now, will AWI read this?
>
> "strike rapier" <strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3ea06980$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Apr 19, 2003, 4:43pm
We are only talking about those that are seriously adult.
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3ea15a35 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Worlds which were rated R in a 3.3 browser will show up as PG-13 in a 3.4
browser because the numeric rating used internally has changed meanings as
of AW 3.4 to accomodate the addition of the PG-13 rating. This should be
only a temporary set-back. As for worlds having a rating enforced, I think
yes there should be a way to do that, but it should be used extremely
sparingly because to do otherwise would discourage attempts at changing a
world's rating and content to something seen as being less objectionable,
and just because a world "had" a certain rating doesn't and shouldn't mean
that the people in charge of it can't ever decide to change it.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3ea08758$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
for
some
adult
But
their
protected
with
that
require
>
>
|
Apr 19, 2003, 5:25pm
Actually, I was addressing several things which were talked abuot in this message thread.... not just one. Sorry if I was unclear.
TechnoZeus
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message news:3ea18abc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> We are only talking about those that are seriously adult.
>
>
> "technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
> news:3ea15a35 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> browser because the numeric rating used internally has changed meanings as
> of AW 3.4 to accomodate the addition of the PG-13 rating. This should be
> only a temporary set-back. As for worlds having a rating enforced, I think
> yes there should be a way to do that, but it should be used extremely
> sparingly because to do otherwise would discourage attempts at changing a
> world's rating and content to something seen as being less objectionable,
> and just because a world "had" a certain rating doesn't and shouldn't mean
> that the people in charge of it can't ever decide to change it.
> news:3ea08758$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> for
> some
> adult
> But
> their
> protected
> with
> that
> require
>
>
|
Apr 20, 2003, 3:53am
Its alright honey, I'm sure I was being awfully blonde! LOL.
[View Quote]"technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
news:3ea194ad$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Actually, I was addressing several things which were talked abuot in this
message thread.... not just one. Sorry if I was unclear.
>
> TechnoZeus
>
> "goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message
news:3ea18abc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
3.4
as
be
think
a
objectionable,
mean
okay
take
an
higher.
failed
this?
>
>
|
Apr 20, 2003, 9:37am
Cute. :)
TZ
[View Quote]"goddess innie" <ami at chazdesigns.com> wrote in message news:3ea227e2$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Its alright honey, I'm sure I was being awfully blonde! LOL.
>
> "technozeus" <TechnoZeus at usa.net> wrote in message
> news:3ea194ad$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> message thread.... not just one. Sorry if I was unclear.
> news:3ea18abc at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> 3.4
> as
> be
> think
> a
> objectionable,
> mean
> okay
> take
> an
> higher.
> failed
> this?
>
>
|
|