ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
:) (Wishlist)
:) // WishlistbillybobJun 23, 2002, 3:38am
Hey, AW new feature to add to your, hopefully large list. How about a way
for all chat to run through a bot? What I mean is instead of broadcasting the chat messages to all, only gives it to a bot(with CT of course). That way the bot could then proccess the chat and resend it to everyone....this would allow CTs to customize the chat of their users, and edit out bad words. Of course it might lead to putting words in people's mouths, heh, but nevertheless a good feature. bowenJun 23, 2002, 4:52am
That could be done, here's how:
Disable chat in your world, give it only to the Bot. Have people whisper to your bot what they want to say. Then have the bot repeat what they say using a console message, customized to whatever you want. Hope that helps. --Bowen-- [View Quote] lord fettJun 23, 2002, 5:12am
Well having to whisper to the bot what you want to say gets annoying after
awhile. Also, what if the bot is out of range? This chat system should work in global mode and not just near the bot. -Lord Fett [View Quote] bowenJun 23, 2002, 5:16am
Well it's far from perfect, but it should still work. The only other way to
do it would be to build in some sort of bot to the browsers, or servers, to intercept the messages before they're broadcasted. --Bowen-- [View Quote] tony mJun 23, 2002, 5:37am
i believe this is being added to 3.4, is it not?
[View Quote] >Hey, AW new feature to add to your, hopefully large list. How about a way >for all chat to run through a bot? What I mean is instead of broadcasting >the chat messages to all, only gives it to a bot(with CT of course). That >way the bot could then proccess the chat and resend it to everyone....this >would allow CTs to customize the chat of their users, and edit out bad >words. Of course it might lead to putting words in people's mouths, heh, but >nevertheless a good feature. > > tony mJun 23, 2002, 5:55am
Citing the techtalk from june 7th, this is true:
"Young Shamus: the last feature in the first stage of 3.4 is the world option to always show names, and to block all regular chat - this is so that a bot could handle and process the chat." On 23 Jun 2002 03:37:05 -0400, "tony m" <fldmshl2013 at austin.rr.com> [View Quote] >i believe this is being added to 3.4, is it not? > kahJun 23, 2002, 11:19am
"billybob" <bill at vectracon.com> wrote in
news:3d155ecf at server1.Activeworlds.com: > Hey, AW new feature to add to your, hopefully large list. How about a > way for all chat to run through a bot? What I mean is instead of > broadcasting the chat messages to all, only gives it to a bot(with CT > of course). That way the bot could then proccess the chat and resend > it to everyone....this would allow CTs to customize the chat of their > users, and edit out bad words. Of course it might lead to putting > words in people's mouths, heh, but nevertheless a good feature. Go to ps2linux, there all chat is killed and replaced by console messages, I guess a bot does it. KAH slim smokeyJun 29, 2002, 3:11am
that's the dumbest idea I've ever heard u dumb goody two shoes, lol :)
lollolollollollollollol :) lol [View Quote] lord fettJun 29, 2002, 3:59am
What is your problem? geesh This is a very good feature and from what has
been said, it is being added to AW 3.4. If it was such a dumb idea, then why is it being added to the next browser? Looks like you need to rethink what you say. [View Quote] bowenJun 29, 2002, 4:00am
kahJun 29, 2002, 10:25am
"lord fett" <lordfett at hotmail.com> wrote in
news:3d1d4ca8$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com: > What is your problem? geesh This is a very good feature and from > what has been said, it is being added to AW 3.4. If it was such a dumb > idea, then why is it being added to the next browser? Looks like you > need to rethink what you say. Don't pay attention to him, he just thinks he's really cool because he swears and trashes everyone around... What a sad case. KAH |