|
Suggestion Box (Wishlist)
Suggestion Box // Wishlist
May 8, 2001, 9:10am
For those of you who don't visit AlphaWorld GZ often or just didn't hear
about it yet, AWCI has created a "Suggestion Box" at
http://www.activeworlds.com/products/suggest.html. I believe an employee
of AWCI actually reads the suggestions that people submit (gasp, what a
concept)! So, if you get no response from AWCI regarding your wishes
here in the wishlist newsgroup (which is probably the case), you can
suggest them using the Suggestion Box. Please note that: "Due to the
large volume of suggestions we receive, we are unable to respond to them
individually." At least AWCI is making SOME progress with this
Suggestion Box idea.
Builderz
Stuff-X - Bot & World Hosting Services
http://www.stuffx.com/aw/
May 8, 2001, 12:24pm
I doubt it's any different than this newsgroup, Builderz. I bet most (if not all) of the emails to this address are immediately deleted (or perhaps archived for some laughs later when Rick and JP are bored and need some entertainment. I mean there's just no way of knowing, but it's obvious from their lack of interaction with THIS newsgroup that they just don't seem to care what we want or think. Rick and JP have their own agenda for AW and it doesn't mean making AW easier to use or having new features unless a corporate customer with lots of money requests them (like NT4 support--uh, what's the point? It's already obsolete anyway considering Win2K is out and XP is in beta. Sure, it'll have OpenGL support, but whoopety do.).
No, what I think people (and MANY people!) need to do is constantly bug Rick, JP, and other AWCIers about ONE specific feature (say full-axis object rotation--without action commands--or overlapping sounds) so much that AWCI gets sick of hearing it requested and finally simply implements it to shut us all up. But such a "campaign" needs to be targeted and consistent--people need to bombard AWCIers with such requests and not let up. Yes, this is a "brute force" approach but I feel it's a last resort option given the attitude AWCI seems to have (or at least presents) towards us and AW's development.
[View Quote]
> For those of you who don't visit AlphaWorld GZ often or just didn't hear
> about it yet, AWCI has created a "Suggestion Box" at
> http://www.activeworlds.com/products/suggest.html. I believe an employee
> of AWCI actually reads the suggestions that people submit (gasp, what a
> concept)! So, if you get no response from AWCI regarding your wishes
> here in the wishlist newsgroup (which is probably the case), you can
> suggest them using the Suggestion Box. Please note that: "Due to the
> large volume of suggestions we receive, we are unable to respond to them
> individually." At least AWCI is making SOME progress with this
> Suggestion Box idea.
May 8, 2001, 4:33pm
wow what an idea lol.....but theres no point in making a sugestion box
unless your going to read it...i mean, why would they create more junk in to
store away?? from the reputation of the Wishlist NG i think evryone just
thinks AW just doesnt care about our suggestions BUT that doesnt mean it
will always be true no matter what. Bugging them to death MIGHT get them to
listen or all the anoyingness might just get them agricated and mad and
wouldnt really solve anything
(note: on some things i said MIGHT...doesnt mean thats what i think will
happen)
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AF80105.708EB3D9 at tnlc.com...
> I doubt it's any different than this newsgroup, Builderz. I bet most (if
not all) of the emails to this address are immediately deleted (or perhaps
archived for some laughs later when Rick and JP are bored and need some
entertainment. I mean there's just no way of knowing, but it's obvious from
their lack of interaction with THIS newsgroup that they just don't seem to
care what we want or think. Rick and JP have their own agenda for AW and it
doesn't mean making AW easier to use or having new features unless a
corporate customer with lots of money requests them (like NT4 support--uh,
what's the point? It's already obsolete anyway considering Win2K is out and
XP is in beta. Sure, it'll have OpenGL support, but whoopety do.).
>
> No, what I think people (and MANY people!) need to do is constantly bug
Rick, JP, and other AWCIers about ONE specific feature (say full-axis object
rotation--without action commands--or overlapping sounds) so much that AWCI
gets sick of hearing it requested and finally simply implements it to shut
us all up. But such a "campaign" needs to be targeted and consistent--people
need to bombard AWCIers with such requests and not let up. Yes, this is a
"brute force" approach but I feel it's a last resort option given the
attitude AWCI seems to have (or at least presents) towards us and AW's
development.
>
> builderz wrote:
>
|
May 8, 2001, 5:06pm
Agreed. What I fail to understand is why they created another suggestion box when they already have one (This group)
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AF80105.708EB3D9 at tnlc.com...
> I doubt it's any different than this newsgroup, Builderz. I bet most (if not all) of the emails to this address are immediately
deleted (or perhaps archived for some laughs later when Rick and JP are bored and need some entertainment. I mean there's just no
way of knowing, but it's obvious from their lack of interaction with THIS newsgroup that they just don't seem to care what we want
or think. Rick and JP have their own agenda for AW and it doesn't mean making AW easier to use or having new features unless a
corporate customer with lots of money requests them (like NT4 support--uh, what's the point? It's already obsolete anyway
considering Win2K is out and XP is in beta. Sure, it'll have OpenGL support, but whoopety do.).
>
> No, what I think people (and MANY people!) need to do is constantly bug Rick, JP, and other AWCIers about ONE specific feature
(say full-axis object rotation--without action commands--or overlapping sounds) so much that AWCI gets sick of hearing it requested
and finally simply implements it to shut us all up. But such a "campaign" needs to be targeted and consistent--people need to
bombard AWCIers with such requests and not let up. Yes, this is a "brute force" approach but I feel it's a last resort option given
the attitude AWCI seems to have (or at least presents) towards us and AW's development.
>
> builderz wrote:
>
|
May 8, 2001, 7:04pm
Something else that might work: Every citizen send in an itemized list of what they want and why. I don't mean via email, use regular "snail mail". That way, they can't just click delete. They have to actually open the letter before knowing what it's about, and thousands of letters would send quite a message, don't you think? Sure it might cost a little bit for postage, but it might be worth it.
-Agent1
[View Quote]"eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AF80105.708EB3D9 at tnlc.com...
> I doubt it's any different than this newsgroup, Builderz. I bet most (if not all) of the emails to this address are immediately deleted (or perhaps archived for some laughs later when Rick and JP are bored and need some entertainment. I mean there's just no way of knowing, but it's obvious from their lack of interaction with THIS newsgroup that they just don't seem to care what we want or think. Rick and JP have their own agenda for AW and it doesn't mean making AW easier to use or having new features unless a corporate customer with lots of money requests them (like NT4 support--uh, what's the point? It's already obsolete anyway considering Win2K is out and XP is in beta. Sure, it'll have OpenGL support, but whoopety do.).
>
> No, what I think people (and MANY people!) need to do is constantly bug Rick, JP, and other AWCIers about ONE specific feature (say full-axis object rotation--without action commands--or overlapping sounds) so much that AWCI gets sick of hearing it requested and finally simply implements it to shut us all up. But such a "campaign" needs to be targeted and consistent--people need to bombard AWCIers with such requests and not let up. Yes, this is a "brute force" approach but I feel it's a last resort option given the attitude AWCI seems to have (or at least presents) towards us and AW's development.
|
May 8, 2001, 7:55pm
Got it. *grabs postage*
[View Quote]"agent1" <Agent1 at my.activeworlds.com> wrote in message news:3af85f61$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Something else that might work: Every citizen send in an itemized list of what they want and why. I don't mean via email, use
regular "snail mail". That way, they can't just click delete. They have to actually open the letter before knowing what it's about,
and thousands of letters would send quite a message, don't you think? Sure it might cost a little bit for postage, but it might be
worth it.
>
> -Agent1
>
>
> "eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AF80105.708EB3D9 at tnlc.com...
deleted (or perhaps archived for some laughs later when Rick and JP are bored and need some entertainment. I mean there's just no
way of knowing, but it's obvious from their lack of interaction with THIS newsgroup that they just don't seem to care what we want
or think. Rick and JP have their own agenda for AW and it doesn't mean making AW easier to use or having new features unless a
corporate customer with lots of money requests them (like NT4 support--uh, what's the point? It's already obsolete anyway
considering Win2K is out and XP is in beta. Sure, it'll have OpenGL support, but whoopety do.).
(say full-axis object rotation--without action commands--or overlapping sounds) so much that AWCI gets sick of hearing it requested
and finally simply implements it to shut us all up. But such a "campaign" needs to be targeted and consistent--people need to
bombard AWCIers with such requests and not let up. Yes, this is a "brute force" approach but I feel it's a last resort option given
the attitude AWCI seems to have (or at least presents) towards us and AW's development.
>
>
|
May 9, 2001, 11:45am
Well, I already have my list at http://tnlc.com/eep/aw/improve.html so if people agree with some, most, or even all of the things on it they should just point AWCI's attention to it, perhaps stating their most desired improvement. However, without ANY response from AW even in this newsgroup I doubt such a campaign will have little to any effect. The more people who bug AWCI on-line AND off-line, the better. AWCI needs checks and balances to keep it in-line with what its MUCH more abundant $20/year users want.
[View Quote]
> Something else that might work: Every citizen send in an itemized list of what they want and why. I don't mean via email, use regular "snail mail". That way, they can't just click delete. They have to actually open the letter before knowing what it's about, and thousands of letters would send quite a message, don't you think? Sure it might cost a little bit for postage, but it might be worth it.
>
[View Quote]> "eep" <eep at tnlc.com> wrote in message news:3AF80105.708EB3D9 at tnlc.com...
|
|