ThreadBoard ArchivesSite FeaturesActiveworlds SupportHistoric Archives |
Being able to give someone CT with limited.... (Wishlist)
Being able to give someone CT with limited.... // Wishlistcrazy glue ilMar 15, 2001, 12:54am
Rights to change thing.
Like make it so they can only edit the lights and fog option, or maybe the rights. Maybe you understand what I'm saying, maybe not. xeroMar 15, 2001, 2:46am
You could use a bot to change it..or maybe get people you trust more to give
ct to..lol the ability to cut off peoples CT rights won't happen to soon it seems..atleast by the way it currently works..although it would be kinda cool.... [View Quote] ananasMar 15, 2001, 3:08am
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------7C8A73F95DD70DDBA2EFF47E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think an easy-to-handle solution would be, to have switches in all world options if they require caretaker or if emminent domain is sufficient. [View Quote] begin:vcard n:Hatzenberger;Volker x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:oct31.de adr:;;Bornheimer Strasse 15;Bonn;;53111;Germany version:2.1 email;internet:vha at oct31.de end:vcard --------------7C8A73F95DD70DDBA2EFF47E-- felix2001Apr 23, 2001, 8:45pm
"Nice idea, but people are able to get by with privelege passwords," AW
Creators would probably say. I think we should start a boycott of AW until they come up with new features that attract more users, like shadows, making a certain area that you built restricted to flying or going through walls like, "create thru off" or something, I don't know. AW is just getting kind of old.. the light and move, rotate, and examine were great updates, but compared to the updating some other companies are probably doing it's nothing. Anyway, my point is, we need more features. I can't put it any plainer [View Quote] wingApr 23, 2001, 9:39pm
Retard, if AW is boycotted, they will have 0 income and be able to get NOTHING done. Either that or you'd just look like an IDIOT
because nobody joins your little movement (the latter is more probable) [View Quote] |