1  |   Order by index

Dec 1, 1998, 2:33pm

I installed AW_CALLBACK_CITIZEN_ATTRIBUTES as:
rc := aw_kallback_set(AW_CALLBACK_CITIZEN_ATTRIBUTES,
at cbkCitizenAttributes);

The callback routine starts so:
procedure cbkCitizenAttributes(rc: Integer);

When I test rc in this routine, I allways get a constant number (it
only varies if I restart the program), never zero. So I can't know
whether there is an error or not. For example: If I ask for, say, the
valid citnum of COF, I get 1, as expected, and rc = 4376872. If I then
ask for the citnum of non-existant HJHJHJHJHJHJHJHJH, I get the
previous values again: COF and 1, and rc = 4376872.

Is this again a Delphi bug, a XelaG lack-of-knowledge, or am I missing
something important?

<whisper> I WON'T PUBLISH ALL MY TESTS HERE THIS TIME.....

NB: kallback is spelled so on purpose. I use Canopus' akAWAPI.

XelaG

Dec 11, 1998, 5:12am

I ran the Delphi version of Sample 2, as given in the thread for 10/13/98,
except that the callback for aw_query now reports out the value of rc.
Just as XelaG states, the value is a large integer, 4364400, and not a
reason code. What does this number represent?

[View Quote] > I installed AW_CALLBACK_CITIZEN_ATTRIBUTES as:
> rc := aw_kallback_set(AW_CALLBACK_CITIZEN_ATTRIBUTES,
> at cbkCitizenAttributes);
>
> The callback routine starts so:
> procedure cbkCitizenAttributes(rc: Integer);
>
> When I test rc in this routine, I allways get a constant number (it
> only varies if I restart the program), never zero. So I can't know
> whether there is an error or not. For example: If I ask for, say, the
> valid citnum of COF, I get 1, as expected, and rc = 4376872. If I then
> ask for the citnum of non-existant HJHJHJHJHJHJHJHJH, I get the
> previous values again: COF and 1, and rc = 4376872.
>
> Is this again a Delphi bug, a XelaG lack-of-knowledge, or am I missing
> something important?
>
> <whisper> I WON'T PUBLISH ALL MY TESTS HERE THIS TIME.....
>
> NB: kallback is spelled so on purpose. I use Canopus' akAWAPI.
>
> XelaG

1  |   Order by index