|
spider (Bots)
spider // Bots
Oct 27, 2004, 6:27pm
A few friends of mine have found out that a spider bot has been in their
world in DLP What exactly is that and what does it do? anyone know? How
could one get in if they dont have bot rights?
Oct 27, 2004, 7:07pm
'spider' bot? could be a world ripper, or just a admin to take the world
keywords.
- MR
[View Quote]"ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41800499 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>A few friends of mine have found out that a spider bot has been in their
> world in DLP What exactly is that and what does it do? anyone know? How
> could one get in if they dont have bot rights?
>
>
|
Oct 27, 2004, 8:17pm
[View Quote]On 10/27/2004 3:27 PM, ciena wrote:
> How could one get in if they dont have bot rights?
|
Universe caretaker (citizen #1) privileges.
Oct 28, 2004, 12:15am
so u dont think its someone trying to steal paths?
[View Quote]"tony m" <tony at crb.delusional-minds.com> wrote in message
news:41801e88$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> On 10/27/2004 3:27 PM, ciena wrote:
>
> Universe caretaker (citizen #1) privileges.
|
Oct 28, 2004, 12:26am
DLP probably has a really big problem if someone's stolen the universe caretaker PPW. Most likely, it's just DLP doing statistics.
AWI at one point (and maybe they still do) ran spiderbots to implement the "Search" tab; the bot entered your world, looked at what you entered for search keywords, and that was put in the database.
[View Quote]On 10/27/2004 9:15 PM, ciena wrote:
|
> so u dont think its someone trying to steal paths?
Oct 28, 2004, 12:46am
why would they have to do that?
[View Quote]"tony m" <tony at crb.delusional-minds.com> wrote in message
news:418058d7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> DLP probably has a really big problem if someone's stolen the universe
caretaker PPW. Most likely, it's just DLP doing statistics.
>
> AWI at one point (and maybe they still do) ran spiderbots to implement the
"Search" tab; the bot entered your world, looked at what you entered for
search keywords, and that was put in the database.
>
> On 10/27/2004 9:15 PM, ciena wrote:
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 1:44am
put in their ip manually in the eject box :)
Oct 28, 2004, 10:24am
Interesting, I didn't know awi would come into my world to get keywords LOL
.... I don't mind I spose but would be nice if they said hello :oP
LNH
--
[View Quote]"tony m" <tony at crb.delusional-minds.com> wrote in message
news:418058d7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> DLP probably has a really big problem if someone's stolen the universe
caretaker PPW. Most likely, it's just DLP doing statistics.
>
> AWI at one point (and maybe they still do) ran spiderbots to implement the
"Search" tab; the bot entered your world, looked at what you entered for
search keywords, and that was put in the database.
>
> On 10/27/2004 9:15 PM, ciena wrote:
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 12:53pm
When we implemented the "keywords" feature the point was to make a
searchable index of all the worlds.
The way it was supposed to work was World Owners would put in keywords and
the world rating, then we would run a bot that could jump in, do a quick
scan - reading the keywords and the rating and then compile a list. We
thought it was a good idea... but then some world owners complained about
the violation of privacy (when the bot entered a closed world). So we
turned it off
E
[View Quote]"lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4180e51b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Interesting, I didn't know awi would come into my world to get keywords
LOL
> ... I don't mind I spose but would be nice if they said hello :oP
>
> LNH
>
>
>
> --
>
> "tony m" <tony at crb.delusional-minds.com> wrote in message
> news:418058d7$2 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> caretaker PPW. Most likely, it's just DLP doing statistics.
the
> "Search" tab; the bot entered your world, looked at what you entered for
> search keywords, and that was put in the database.
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 1:27pm
seems like its still going on in dlp
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:418107d1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> When we implemented the "keywords" feature the point was to make a
> searchable index of all the worlds.
>
> The way it was supposed to work was World Owners would put in keywords and
> the world rating, then we would run a bot that could jump in, do a quick
> scan - reading the keywords and the rating and then compile a list. We
> thought it was a good idea... but then some world owners complained about
> the violation of privacy (when the bot entered a closed world). So we
> turned it off
>
> E
>
>
> "lady nighthawk" <dmurtagh27 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4180e51b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> LOL
> the
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 1:45pm
no idea
they might have written their own bot but they aren't using ours
E
[View Quote]"ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41810ff5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> seems like its still going on in dlp
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:418107d1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
and
about
keywords
universe
implement
for
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 1:58pm
is that legal to go in private worlds and do that? and can they steal paths
with that bot?
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41811403$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> no idea
>
> they might have written their own bot but they aren't using ours
>
>
> E
>
>
> "ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41810ff5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> and
quick
We
> about
> keywords
> universe
> implement
> for
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 2:01pm
you can't steal paths with a normal bot, maybe using a citsdk, but those
aren't easy to make/find, since well, AW doesn't actually make them.
and why would it be illegal? O_O all it's doing is checking the keywords.
-SWE
[View Quote]"ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41811716$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> is that legal to go in private worlds and do that? and can they steal
> paths
> with that bot?
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:41811403$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> quick
> We
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 2:15pm
I didnt understand why they need a bot to look at world rating. All they
gotta do is look on the world list or go in and look at world features.
[View Quote]"swe" <swe at swehli.com> wrote in message
news:418117c4$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> you can't steal paths with a normal bot, maybe using a citsdk, but those
> aren't easy to make/find, since well, AW doesn't actually make them.
> and why would it be illegal? O_O all it's doing is checking the keywords.
>
> -SWE
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 2:33pm
[View Quote]
> I didnt understand why they need a bot to look at world rating. All they
> gotta do is look on the world list or go in and look at world features.
>
Simple as that:
Visit the 1000+ world and write the info down manually then transfer it to the search system :)
Seriously:
The program gives full right to the Universe owner - Cit#1 can do anything anywhere. To fill up the Search system, you have to use a bot otherwise the job just not maintainable.
It is the same as the Google bot on your web pages - the only thing is missing that you can't tell the Cit#1 bot: don't come here.
Hope this helps,
--
Andras
"It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
Oct 28, 2004, 2:55pm
oh ok thanx for clearing this up for me :)
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote in message
news:41811f73$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> ciena wrote:
>
>
> Simple as that:
> Visit the 1000+ world and write the info down manually then transfer it to
the search system :)
> Seriously:
> The program gives full right to the Universe owner - Cit#1 can do anything
anywhere. To fill up the Search system, you have to use a bot otherwise the
job just not maintainable.
> It is the same as the Google bot on your web pages - the only thing is
missing that you can't tell the Cit#1 bot: don't come here.
>
> Hope this helps,
> --
> Andras
> "It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
|
Oct 28, 2004, 4:44pm
cause cit#1 has uni CT it is also in every world it gets the object password
in encrypted form , just like all the other attributes , what the bot does
with it , no clue .
Oct 28, 2004, 7:23pm
thanx :)
[View Quote]"the j0k3r ss" <wsdfdf at sdd.sss> wrote in message
news:41813df5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> cause cit#1 has uni CT it is also in every world it gets the object
password
> in encrypted form , just like all the other attributes , what the bot does
> with it , no clue .
>
>
|
Oct 28, 2004, 11:22pm
[View Quote]
> cause cit#1 has uni CT it is also in every world it gets the object password
> in encrypted form , just like all the other attributes , what the bot does
> with it , no clue .
>
>
Wrong - even the Cit#1 can't get the OP password!!
Only the browser gets it which can't render the world without it <and of course the admin bot/tool but this is the only one which doesn't have the Cit#1 privilege!!> :)
--
Andras
"It's MY computer" (tm Steve Gibson)
Oct 29, 2004, 12:39am
bot on CT can get it also , i will post an example bot if you like .
Oct 29, 2004, 2:05am
Lets not do that shall we :O
The OP pass decryption was cracked a long time ago, CT Bots do get it
encrypted as far as I can see.
- MR
[View Quote]"the j0k3r ss" <wsdfdf at sdd.sss> wrote in message
news:4181ad7e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bot on CT can get it also , i will post an example bot if you like .
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 2:09am
eject: 64.94.241.0
Usually does the job (I think its that IP range anyhow)
- MR
[View Quote]"andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote:
> ciena wrote:
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 12:04pm
We wrote ours in response to WO and citizens requesting a searchable DB. We
thought it was a good idea so we wrote our bot. Then some WO realized that
a bot would come into a "closed" world and decided they didn't like it. We
stopped. There is no legal issue involved and the use of the world server
software does come with a license.
IMO it was a loss, the searchtab would have been a much more usable feature.
What OTHER Universe owners or caretakers decide to do with THEIR Universe
caretaker rights is entirely up to them and the agreement you have with
them. If you do not like the way they operate there are a lot of other
Universes who would love to add your world.
E
[View Quote]"ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:41811716$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> is that legal to go in private worlds and do that? and can they steal
paths
> with that bot?
> "e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
> news:41811403$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
keywords
> quick
> We
we
entered
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 12:29pm
you can't eject anyone with CT rights though, and cit #1 has ct everywhere.
O_O
-SWE
[View Quote]"strike rapier" <Strike at rapiercom.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:4181c289 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> eject: 64.94.241.0
>
> Usually does the job (I think its that IP range anyhow)
>
> - MR
>
> "andras" <andras at andras.net> wrote:
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 12:32pm
sharing is caring :)
-SWE
[View Quote]"the j0k3r ss" <wsdfdf at sdd.sss> wrote in message
news:4181ad7e at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> bot on CT can get it also , i will post an example bot if you like .
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 2:58pm
Why not just take the bot off the universe CT (to an un-privlidged
account) and just let it search the open worlds?
The point of the search tab is to help users find a specific world they
are looking for (with minimal previous knowledge about the world), and
to help users locate worlds of interest to them based on a
keyword/catagory. Would you agree with that statement?
Why, then, would you want to include closed worlds in the search
database anyways? It's not going to be very helpful to return search
results including closed worlds. The people using the search tab are
generally looking for public worlds that match a given interest they have.
If a person has enter rights to a closed world, they're probably not
going to be searching for that world...
So, just set the bot to a normal account and let it run though the world
list. If it can't enter a world, then just skip it and move on to the
next. This would allow the the people with closed worlds to keep their
privacy. The people with open worlds obviously aren't too concerned with
their privacy (otherwise their world wouldn't be public), so they
shouldn't mind the bot coming in to index the world.
Sounds like a compramise to me...
-Jeremy
[View Quote]
> We wrote ours in response to WO and citizens requesting a searchable DB. We
> thought it was a good idea so we wrote our bot. Then some WO realized that
> a bot would come into a "closed" world and decided they didn't like it. We
> stopped. There is no legal issue involved and the use of the world server
> software does come with a license.
>
> IMO it was a loss, the searchtab would have been a much more usable feature.
>
> What OTHER Universe owners or caretakers decide to do with THEIR Universe
> caretaker rights is entirely up to them and the agreement you have with
> them. If you do not like the way they operate there are a lot of other
> Universes who would love to add your world.
>
>
> E
>
>
>
[View Quote]> "ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41811716$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
> paths
>
>
> keywords
>
>
> we
>
>
> entered
>
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 3:31pm
I'm staying with aw. I tried other unis and everytime I been in them theres
from 0 to 6 to 20 users, AW still is ithe best in my opinion. Some only
allow a p5 world or p10 world and some charge just for a tiny lot. And some
Speak in another laungage. Some will close down probably but aw will always
be here. If aw ever goes down, they all will. So I stay here :)
[View Quote]"e n z o" <enzo at activeworlds.com> wrote in message
news:41824de6 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> We wrote ours in response to WO and citizens requesting a searchable DB.
We
> thought it was a good idea so we wrote our bot. Then some WO realized
that
> a bot would come into a "closed" world and decided they didn't like it.
We
> stopped. There is no legal issue involved and the use of the world server
> software does come with a license.
>
> IMO it was a loss, the searchtab would have been a much more usable
feature.
>
> What OTHER Universe owners or caretakers decide to do with THEIR Universe
> caretaker rights is entirely up to them and the agreement you have with
> them. If you do not like the way they operate there are a lot of other
> Universes who would love to add your world.
>
>
> E
>
>
>
> "ciena" <ciena58 at hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:41811716$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> paths
> keywords
list.
complained
So
> we
:oP
> entered
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 3:33pm
Sounds good to me.
[View Quote]"jerme" <JerMe at nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:418276cd$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Why not just take the bot off the universe CT (to an un-privlidged
> account) and just let it search the open worlds?
>
> The point of the search tab is to help users find a specific world they
> are looking for (with minimal previous knowledge about the world), and
> to help users locate worlds of interest to them based on a
> keyword/catagory. Would you agree with that statement?
>
> Why, then, would you want to include closed worlds in the search
> database anyways? It's not going to be very helpful to return search
> results including closed worlds. The people using the search tab are
> generally looking for public worlds that match a given interest they have.
>
> If a person has enter rights to a closed world, they're probably not
> going to be searching for that world...
>
> So, just set the bot to a normal account and let it run though the world
> list. If it can't enter a world, then just skip it and move on to the
> next. This would allow the the people with closed worlds to keep their
> privacy. The people with open worlds obviously aren't too concerned with
> their privacy (otherwise their world wouldn't be public), so they
> shouldn't mind the bot coming in to index the world.
>
> Sounds like a compramise to me...
>
> -Jeremy
>
>
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 5:20pm
You can eject *anyone* by adding their IP to the eject database.
Right-clicking to eject wouldn't work, but adding their IP would.
Ryan
[View Quote]swe wrote:
> you can't eject anyone with CT rights though, and cit #1 has ct everywhere.
> O_O
>
> -SWE
>
|
Oct 29, 2004, 6:43pm
not cit #1
[View Quote]"ryan" <ryan at example.com> wrote in message
news:4182980b at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> You can eject *anyone* by adding their IP to the eject database.
> Right-clicking to eject wouldn't work, but adding their IP would.
>
> Ryan
>
> swe wrote:
everywhere.
|
|