1  |   Order by index

Feb 16, 2002, 6:23pm

To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)

Feb 16, 2002, 6:51pm

It has been done, but AW didn't like it ;). There's no SDK methods to log a
bot in as a citizenship. So, sorry :(. You could play with VB and some
tools that would take control of aw and work like a bot :). But, without
the AW browser, you cant log in as a citizen. Sorry :(.

-Joe

[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 6:51pm

Probably a different version of the SDK. I don't think AW will do that..
could lead to some spam problems. (would be flaged as a citizen and would
be allowed at GZ.. could also use Tgrams I'd assume)

-silenced

[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 7:17pm

well, the tgrams are why it would be awesome :) Maybe AW should add an SDK
thing to let bots reciev tgrams. :-D
[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 7:22pm

Hmm, but what if a company bought a citizenship and used a both like
interface for that and started spamming it's website to you every 2 minutes?
And the 3.3 issue of blocking it.. what if they buy a lot of citizenships
and rotate them? It would be a pain :) I'd just rather use a bot to do odd
tasks for me, if people want to chat with me without the graphics, they can
download all those little clients :D.

On the other hand if they could just recieve them, that'd be cool.

-silenced

[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 8:53pm

Or maybe a whole different way of allowing bots to interract with others
outside of their range. Like an extended whisper that requires someone to
send a msg first so that the bot cannot send out the extended whisper
without first getting one from that person.

[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 9:34pm

As Joe said, it's been done and AW didn't like it,
It'll all down to writing a custom SDK.

-----

[View Quote] -Joe

[View Quote]

Feb 16, 2002, 9:52pm

Bots don't need the citizen password for login. That
would mean, that a ppw. would be sufficient to read
someone elses telegrams. I don't think that this is
really a good idea.

[View Quote] --
"_
|
/\
\ /
__/ /_

Feb 16, 2002, 11:30pm

You would make it so that the bot has it's own tgram inbox. Like it would be
x-y X being your name and Y being the bots name and tgrams could only be
recieved while the bot was online.
[View Quote]

Feb 26, 2002, 5:22am

sendkeys, lol..




-
kids are stupid..

[View Quote]

1  |   Order by index