|
What would it take... (Bots)
What would it take... // Bots
Feb 16, 2002, 6:23pm
To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)
Feb 16, 2002, 6:51pm
It has been done, but AW didn't like it ;). There's no SDK methods to log a
bot in as a citizenship. So, sorry :(. You could play with VB and some
tools that would take control of aw and work like a bot :). But, without
the AW browser, you cant log in as a citizen. Sorry :(.
-Joe
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ebfda$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
> regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
> although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
> have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 6:51pm
Probably a different version of the SDK. I don't think AW will do that..
could lead to some spam problems. (would be flaged as a citizen and would
be allowed at GZ.. could also use Tgrams I'd assume)
-silenced
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ebfda$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
> regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
> although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
> have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 7:17pm
well, the tgrams are why it would be awesome :) Maybe AW should add an SDK
thing to let bots reciev tgrams. :-D
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ec666 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Probably a different version of the SDK. I don't think AW will do that..
> could lead to some spam problems. (would be flaged as a citizen and would
> be allowed at GZ.. could also use Tgrams I'd assume)
>
> -silenced
>
> "dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
> news:3c6ebfda$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 7:22pm
Hmm, but what if a company bought a citizenship and used a both like
interface for that and started spamming it's website to you every 2 minutes?
And the 3.3 issue of blocking it.. what if they buy a lot of citizenships
and rotate them? It would be a pain :) I'd just rather use a bot to do odd
tasks for me, if people want to chat with me without the graphics, they can
download all those little clients :D.
On the other hand if they could just recieve them, that'd be cool.
-silenced
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ecc77$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> well, the tgrams are why it would be awesome :) Maybe AW should add an SDK
> thing to let bots reciev tgrams. :-D
> "silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
> news:3c6ec666 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
that..
would
a
to
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 8:53pm
Or maybe a whole different way of allowing bots to interract with others
outside of their range. Like an extended whisper that requires someone to
send a msg first so that the bot cannot send out the extended whisper
without first getting one from that person.
[View Quote]"silenced" <nospam at privacy.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ecda5$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> Hmm, but what if a company bought a citizenship and used a both like
> interface for that and started spamming it's website to you every 2
minutes?
> And the 3.3 issue of blocking it.. what if they buy a lot of citizenships
> and rotate them? It would be a pain :) I'd just rather use a bot to do
odd
> tasks for me, if people want to chat with me without the graphics, they
can
> download all those little clients :D.
>
> On the other hand if they could just recieve them, that'd be cool.
>
> -silenced
>
> "dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
> news:3c6ecc77$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
SDK
> that..
> would
like
> a
possible,
cool
> to
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 9:34pm
As Joe said, it's been done and AW didn't like it,
It'll all down to writing a custom SDK.
-----
[View Quote]"joeman" <Joeman at bootdown.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ec647$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
It has been done, but AW didn't like it ;). There's no SDK methods to log a
bot in as a citizenship. So, sorry :(. You could play with VB and some
tools that would take control of aw and work like a bot :). But, without
the AW browser, you cant log in as a citizen. Sorry :(.
|
-Joe
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ebfda$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
> regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
> although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
> have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)
>
>
|
Feb 16, 2002, 9:52pm
Bots don't need the citizen password for login. That
would mean, that a ppw. would be sufficient to read
someone elses telegrams. I don't think that this is
really a good idea.
[View Quote]silenced wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> On the other hand if they could just recieve them, that'd be cool.
>
> -silenced
|
--
"_
|
/\
\ /
__/ /_
Feb 16, 2002, 11:30pm
You would make it so that the bot has it's own tgram inbox. Like it would be
x-y X being your name and Y being the bots name and tgrams could only be
recieved while the bot was online.
[View Quote]"ananas" <vha at oct31.de> wrote in message news:3C6EED91.AA671F59 at oct31.de...
> Bots don't need the citizen password for login. That
> would mean, that a ppw. would be sufficient to read
> someone elses telegrams. I don't think that this is
> really a good idea.
>
> silenced wrote:
>
> --
> "_
> |
> /\
> \ /
> __/ /_
|
Feb 26, 2002, 5:22am
sendkeys, lol..
-
kids are stupid..
[View Quote]"dion" <GovDion at subdimension.com> wrote in message
news:3c6ebfda$1 at server1.Activeworlds.com...
> To create a bot that ran on a citizenship rather than on your ppw like a
> regular bot. I guess I'm just interested, wondering if it's possible,
> although I know nothing about bot programming, hehe. :-) It'd be cool to
> have a bot that didn't use those brackets, though :)
>
>
|
|